Re: [gentoo-user] fsck and mount by label
Am 30.07.2011 16:01, schrieb Michael Mol: On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote: Hello list! I've noticed the following in my rc.log file: [file system mounting ...] opt: clean, 3127/6496 files, 108510/209920 blocks fsck.ext4: Unable to resolve »LABEL=backup« * Operational error The backup disk is the only one (besides boot and root) which is mounted by label. After booting, I find that the backup disk was mounted correctly. If I then try to run `fsck.ext4 LABEL=backup`, it works as expected. Does anyone have an explanation for this? Could it be that the volume 'backup' is on isn't available yet? (i.e. brought up by lvm later in the boot process) I thought of this, as well, especially because it is a firewire disk. But then why is it mounted correctly? Regards, Florian Philipp signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] fsck and mount by label
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote: Am 30.07.2011 16:01, schrieb Michael Mol: On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote: Hello list! I've noticed the following in my rc.log file: [file system mounting ...] opt: clean, 3127/6496 files, 108510/209920 blocks fsck.ext4: Unable to resolve »LABEL=backup« * Operational error The backup disk is the only one (besides boot and root) which is mounted by label. After booting, I find that the backup disk was mounted correctly. If I then try to run `fsck.ext4 LABEL=backup`, it works as expected. Does anyone have an explanation for this? Could it be that the volume 'backup' is on isn't available yet? (i.e. brought up by lvm later in the boot process) I thought of this, as well, especially because it is a firewire disk. But then why is it mounted correctly? It might be brought up by an automounter later on. You might try removing the entry from fstab, and see if it still gets mounted. -- :wq
[gentoo-user] fsck and mount by label
Hello list! I've noticed the following in my rc.log file: [file system mounting ...] opt: clean, 3127/6496 files, 108510/209920 blocks fsck.ext4: Unable to resolve »LABEL=backup« * Operational error The backup disk is the only one (besides boot and root) which is mounted by label. After booting, I find that the backup disk was mounted correctly. If I then try to run `fsck.ext4 LABEL=backup`, it works as expected. Does anyone have an explanation for this? Thanks in advance! Florian Philipp signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] fsck and mount by label
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote: Hello list! I've noticed the following in my rc.log file: [file system mounting ...] opt: clean, 3127/6496 files, 108510/209920 blocks fsck.ext4: Unable to resolve »LABEL=backup« * Operational error The backup disk is the only one (besides boot and root) which is mounted by label. After booting, I find that the backup disk was mounted correctly. If I then try to run `fsck.ext4 LABEL=backup`, it works as expected. Does anyone have an explanation for this? Could it be that the volume 'backup' is on isn't available yet? (i.e. brought up by lvm later in the boot process) -- :wq
