[gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Enrico Weigelt

Hi folks,

I just wanted to install gedit on an system already runing Xorg,
but I'm horrified about the dependencies. All useflags are disabled,
but still 38 packages required.

Is it possible to trim this down somehow ? 


cu
-- 
-
 Enrico Weigelt==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
-
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Cabillot Julien

No..
But you can try mousepad (from the xfce project).

On 3/8/07, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Hi folks,

I just wanted to install gedit on an system already runing Xorg,
but I'm horrified about the dependencies. All useflags are disabled,
but still 38 packages required.

Is it possible to trim this down somehow ?


cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
-
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list





--
Julien Cabillot


Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 20:07 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
 Hi folks,
 
 I just wanted to install gedit on an system already runing Xorg,
 but I'm horrified about the dependencies. All useflags are disabled,
 but still 38 packages required.
 
 Is it possible to trim this down somehow ? 
 


Well, gedit is a GNOME app (included in GNOME's standard Desktop
release) and, as such, depends on quite a few gnome libraries.  Looking
at the ebuild, I see nothing particularly outstanding about it's
dependencies relative to other GNOME apps, apart from gtksourceview.
Most GNOME setups will already have these installed.  There's an
optional python use flag that, if enabled, adds some python utilities
and plugins.  There's also a spell use flag for the optional spell
checking capability.

If you are not already running GNOME and don't want to pull in all the
GNOME dependencies, might you want to use some other editor?

--
Albert W. Hopkins
--
Albert W. Hopkins

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Cabillot Julien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 No..
 But you can try mousepad (from the xfce project).

Thanks. I'll have a look at it.


cu
-- 
-
 Enrico Weigelt==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
-
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

 Looking at the ebuild, I see nothing particularly outstanding about 
 it's dependencies relative to other GNOME apps, apart from gtksourceview.

there's lots of documentation stuff pulled in, although I've 
switched off the docs useflag.

./configure tells me some optional things, ie. scrollkeeper. 
I wonder if gtksourceview and the printing stuff could be made 
optional (./configure doesnt tell anything about it).

 Most GNOME setups will already have these installed.

I don't have any GNOME setup. I just want an easy-to-use editor,
nothing else.


cu
-- 
-
 Enrico Weigelt==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
-
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 21:02 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
 * Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
  Looking at the ebuild, I see nothing particularly outstanding about 
  it's dependencies relative to other GNOME apps, apart from gtksourceview.
 
 there's lots of documentation stuff pulled in, although I've 
 switched off the docs useflag.

Generally the doc use flag is for developer documentation.  That's
probably what it's referring to.

 ./configure tells me some optional things, ie. scrollkeeper. 
 I wonder if gtksourceview and the printing stuff could be made 
 optional (./configure doesnt tell anything about it).

Without gtksourceview you have no gedit.  It's the text widget used by
gedit.  Scrollkeeper is pretty much used by all GNOME apps for help
docs, etc.

  Most GNOME setups will already have these installed.
 
 I don't have any GNOME setup. I just want an easy-to-use editor,
 nothing else.
 

You probably don't want gedit then.  gedit is the text editor for the
GNOME desktop, so it's pretty much integrated with GNOME itself.

--
Albert W. Hopkins

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread James Ausmus

On 3/8/07, Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 21:02 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
 * Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

  Looking at the ebuild, I see nothing particularly outstanding about
  it's dependencies relative to other GNOME apps, apart from gtksourceview.

 there's lots of documentation stuff pulled in, although I've
 switched off the docs useflag.

Generally the doc use flag is for developer documentation.  That's
probably what it's referring to.

 ./configure tells me some optional things, ie. scrollkeeper.
 I wonder if gtksourceview and the printing stuff could be made
 optional (./configure doesnt tell anything about it).

Without gtksourceview you have no gedit.  It's the text widget used by
gedit.  Scrollkeeper is pretty much used by all GNOME apps for help
docs, etc.

  Most GNOME setups will already have these installed.

 I don't have any GNOME setup. I just want an easy-to-use editor,
 nothing else.


You probably don't want gedit then.  gedit is the text editor for the
GNOME desktop, so it's pretty much integrated with GNOME itself.


You could try gvim, if you're already familiar enough with vim (and
gvim only has optional dependancies on gnome et al.)

HTH-

James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 12:34 -0800, James Ausmus wrote:

 You could try gvim, if you're already familiar enough with vim (and
 gvim only has optional dependancies on gnome et al.)

... and I'm a HUGE fan of [g]vim, but I question whether it would fit
the OPs requirement of easy-to-use.

--
Albert W. Hopkins

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Philip Webb
070308 Albert Hopkins wrote:
 On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 20:07 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
 I just wanted to install gedit on an system already runing Xorg,
 but I'm horrified about the dependencies.
 All useflags are disabled, but still 38 packages required.
 Gedit is a GNOME app (included in GNOME's standard Desktop release)
 and, as such, depends on quite a few gnome libraries.
 Looking at the ebuild, I see nothing particularly outstanding
 about its deps relative to other GNOME apps, apart from gtksourceview.

I have basic Gnome libs for Gvim  Epiphany, but it wants  35  deps, incl

  media-libs/gstreamer-0.10.11  1,826 kB
  media-libs/libmpeg2-0.4.0b  USE=X -sdl 463 kB
  media-libs/audiofile-0.2.6-r1  366 kB
  media-sound/esound-0.2.36-r2  USE=-alsa -debug -ipv6 -tcpd 362 kB
  media-video/totem-2.16.4  USE=-a52 -dbus -debug -dvd -ffmpeg -firefox \
   -flac -gnome -hal -lirc -mad mpeg nsplugin -nvtv -ogg -theora -vorbis \
   -xine xv 1,778 kB
  gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner-2.16.2  USE=cdr -debug -dvdr 699 kB
  gnome-extra/gnome-media-2.16.1 USE=-debug -ipv6 -mad -ogg -vorbis 2905 kB
 
I don't have a sound card  have removed all sound software from my box.
Whyever would Gedit want sound pkgs or a CD burner ??

It's probably easier for AH to use Kwrite, if he doesn't like Vim:
even if he has no KDE pkgs installed, it won't ask for  35  deps ...

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,  Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban  Community Studies
TRANSIT`-O--O---'  University of Toronto
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 16:23 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
 I don't have a sound card  have removed all sound software from my
 box.
 Whyever would Gedit want sound pkgs or a CD burner ??
 

It doesn't.  If you look at the ebuild there are no dependencies for
this.  There may be indirect dependencies (remember gedit is part of the
GNOME Desktop) and also remember use flags are very important (e.g. I
have the complete GNOME desktop + other GNOME apps running in a vm, but
none of them pull in esound).

 It's probably easier for AH to use Kwrite, if he doesn't like Vim:
 even if he has no KDE pkgs installed, it won't ask for  35  deps ...
 

I think you got me confused with the OP.  I'm actually very happy with
Vim. :-)  Also, AFAIK there is no ebuild for Kwrite.  Kwrite is part of
kdebase which will still likely pull in a bunch of stuff that the OP
isn't interested in.

I think what the OP is looking for is a simple GUI text editor with no
DE dependencies.  There is a crap load of editors out there (e.g. tea)
but as I've no experience with them to recommend them (plus it's hard
recommending packages as people's preferences vary greatly). But I hope
I've given some clarity as to why gedit has such horrible
dependencies.


--
Albert W. Hopkins

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Philip Webb
070308 Albert Hopkins wrote:
 On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 16:23 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
 I don't have a sound card  have removed all sound software from my box.
 Whyever would Gedit want sound pkgs or a CD burner ??
 It doesn't.

I don't mean to start an argument, but it does want them, as I said,
even if they are not stated deps in the ebuild.  My USE flags are:

  USE=-* apm bitmap-fonts bonobo bzip2 cdr crypt cups dri foomaticdb
 gcj gdbm gif gnutls gpm gtk gtk2 imagemagick imlib java javascript jpeg
 kde lcms libwww lm_sensors mime motif mpeg ncurses nptl nptlonly
 nsplugin nvidia opengl pcre pdf perl plotutils png pop python
 qt3 readline scanner session slang ssl
 tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode usb X xml xorg xv zlib

ie I drop them all, then define those I deliberately want.
If Gedit drags in all deps for the Gnome desktop, then my question is:
whyever would the Gnome desktop want sound pkgs or a CD burner ??
and perhaps too: why does Gedit drag in all the Gnome desktop deps ??
If the answer is That's just the way Gnome does things,
that tends to confirm the correctness of my avoidance of Gnome
in favor of KDE  (installed, but not used) Xfce (smile).

 AFAIK there is no ebuild for Kwrite.  Kwrite is part of Kdebase
 which will still pull in a bunch that the OP isn't interested in.

Kwrite is included under Kate, which is a separate Gentoo pkg,
but what I should have refered to is Kedit:

  eix kedit
  * kde-base/kedit
 Available versions:  (3.5) 3.5.5 ~3.5.6
 Homepage:http://www.kde.org/
 Description: KDE: very simple text editor

The simplest editor I know is 'e3', which I sometimes use:
it's not GUI, but it's very quick  easy (I use the 'Nedit' mode).
Gvim is my mainstay for most things, of course.

HTH the OP.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,  Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban  Community Studies
TRANSIT`-O--O---'  University of Toronto
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 09 March 2007 00:30:56 Philip Webb wrote:
  I don't have a sound card  have removed all sound software from my box.
  Whyever would Gedit want sound pkgs or a CD burner ??
 
  It doesn't.

 I don't mean to start an argument, but it does want them, as I said,
 even if they are not stated deps in the ebuild.  My USE flags are:

   USE=-* apm bitmap-fonts bonobo bzip2 cdr crypt cups dri foomaticdb
  gcj gdbm gif gnutls gpm gtk gtk2 imagemagick imlib java javascript
 jpeg kde lcms libwww lm_sensors mime motif mpeg ncurses nptl nptlonly
 nsplugin nvidia opengl pcre pdf perl plotutils png pop python qt3 readline
 scanner session slang ssl
  tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode usb X xml xorg xv
 zlib

gedit depends on gnome-python-desktop with USE=python enabled.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160991

-- 
Bo Andresen


pgpWxcjGPYTw2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] horrible gedit dependencies

2007-03-08 Thread Neal McConachie
Enrico Weigelt said the following:
 * Cabillot Julien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 No..
 But you can try mousepad (from the xfce project).
 
 Thanks. I'll have a look at it.
 cu
If mousepad doesn't happen to strike your fancy, you could try scite.

It's very simple and straight-forward for basic editing, but also offers
some advanced features for programming if you want to use them.

-nkm
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list