Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick / graphicsmagick collision
On 12/06/2016 12:50, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am 12.06.2016 um 12:05 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it (other
than masking graphics magick):
[blocks B ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]
("media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]" is blocking
media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7)
[blocks B ] media-gfx/imagemagick ("media-gfx/imagemagick" is
blocking media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24)
So here's the question: Why is portage not realising I already have a
suitable *magick and decides I ought to have the blocker?
Install graphicsmagick with USE="-imagemagick".
If I recall correctly the blocker is because of a file or a feature
collision of media-gfx/imagemagick and
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick].
I could do that, but I don't see any compelling reason to have
graphicsmagick at all and I can't figure why portage doesn't accept
installed imagemagick as fulfilling the DEPEND
As per my other reply to Neil, --changed-deps=n makes a difference
emerge --changed-deps=y finds graphicsmagick and wants to use it
emerge --changed-deps=n finds imagemagick and uses that.
Maybe if I set --backtrack= portage will find a
resolution.
Alan
Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick / graphicsmagick collision
On 12/06/2016 12:13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:05:47 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it
(other than masking graphics magick):
[blocks B ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]
("media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]" is blocking
media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7)
[blocks B ] media-gfx/imagemagick ("media-gfx/imagemagick" is
blocking media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24)
graphicsmagick is not installed.
Everything pulling in graphicsmagick is already satisfied by
imagemagick[png]:
So here's the question: Why is portage not realising I already have a
suitable *magick and decides I ought to have the blocker?
You've probably already tried these but
does adding --tree give anything more useful?
Not really. The depgraph in the error output covers it all
Does grep magick -r /etc/portage show anything?
No,
# grep -r magick /etc/portage/
/etc/portage/make.conf: -icq icu id3tag ieee1394 imagemagick imap
innodb introspection \
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use:media-gfx/imagemagick fpx hdri q32 q8
/etc/portage/package.use/libperl:media-gfx/imagemagick -perl
I *did* have --changed-deps=y in my emerge world command, taking it out
works and portage does what I expect. I read the man page entry for it, but
a) it doesn't make much sense
b) I can't see how that would make a difference
Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick / graphicsmagick collision
Am 12.06.2016 um 12:05 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
> ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it (other
> than masking graphics magick):
>
> [blocks B ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]
> ("media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]" is blocking
> media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7)
> [blocks B ] media-gfx/imagemagick ("media-gfx/imagemagick" is
> blocking media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24)
> So here's the question: Why is portage not realising I already have a
> suitable *magick and decides I ought to have the blocker?
Install graphicsmagick with USE="-imagemagick".
If I recall correctly the blocker is because of a file or a feature
collision of media-gfx/imagemagick and
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick].
Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick / graphicsmagick collision
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:05:47 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
> ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it
> (other than masking graphics magick):
>
> [blocks B ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]
> ("media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]" is blocking
> media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7)
> [blocks B ] media-gfx/imagemagick ("media-gfx/imagemagick" is
> blocking media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24)
> graphicsmagick is not installed.
>
>
> Everything pulling in graphicsmagick is already satisfied by
> imagemagick[png]:
> So here's the question: Why is portage not realising I already have a
> suitable *magick and decides I ought to have the blocker?
You've probably already tried these but
does adding --tree give anything more useful?
Does grep magick -r /etc/portage show anything?
--
Neil Bothwick
Did you hear about the dyslexic devil worshiper?
He sold his soul to Santa!
pgpTFGe2O_oz6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-user] imagemagick / graphicsmagick collision
Hi all,
My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it (other
than masking graphics magick):
[blocks B ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]
("media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]" is blocking
media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7)
[blocks B ] media-gfx/imagemagick ("media-gfx/imagemagick" is
blocking media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24)
media-gfx/imagemagick:0
(media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7:0/6.9.4.7::gentoo, ebuild scheduled
for merge) pulled in by
(no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)
(media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.6:0/6.9.4.6::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>=media-gfx/imagemagick-5.5.7.14:0/6.9.4.6= required by
(media-video/dvdauthor-0.7.1:0/0::gentoo, installed)
^^^
(and 1 more with the same problem)
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed at the same time on the same system.
(media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
merge) pulled in by
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick,png] required by
(x11-themes/tango-icon-theme-extras-0.1.0-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed)
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick] required by
(media-plugins/kipi-plugins-4.14.0:4/4::gentoo, installed)
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick,png] required by
(x11-themes/tango-icon-theme-0.8.90:0/0::gentoo, installed)
imagemagick is installed:
khamul ~ # eix imagemagick
[U] media-gfx/imagemagick
Available versions: 6.9.0.3(0/6.9.0.3)^u (~)6.9.1.8(0/6.9.1.8)^u
(~)6.9.2.10(0/6.9.2.10)^u (~)6.9.3.10(0/6.9.3.10)^u 6.9.4.1(0/6.9.4.1)^u
(~)6.9.4.5(0/6.9.4.5)^u 6.9.4.6(0/6.9.4.6)^u (~)6.9.4.7(0/6.9.4.7)^u
[M](~)7.0.1.9(0/7.0.1.9)^u {X autotrace bzip2 corefonts cxx djvu fftw
fontconfig fpx graphviz hdri jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lqr lzma opencl
openexr openmp pango perl png postscript q32 q64 q8 raw static-libs svg
test tiff truetype webp wmf xml zlib}
Installed versions: 6.9.4.6(11:31:21 04/06/2016)(X bzip2 cxx djvu
fontconfig fpx graphviz hdri jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lzma openexr openmp
pango png postscript q32 q8 raw svg tiff truetype webp wmf xml zlib
-autotrace -corefonts -fftw -lqr -opencl -perl -q64 -static-libs -test)
graphicsmagick is not installed.
Everything pulling in graphicsmagick is already satisfied by
imagemagick[png]:
tango-icon-theme-extras-0.1.0-r1.ebuild:
|| ( media-gfx/imagemagick[png?]
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick,png?] )
kipi-plugins-4.14.0:
videoslideshow? (
|| ( media-gfx/imagemagick
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick] )
imagemagick? ( || ( media-gfx/imagemagick
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick] ) )
tango-icon-theme-0.8.90.ebuild
|| ( media-gfx/imagemagick[png?]
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick,png?] )
So here's the question: Why is portage not realising I already have a
suitable *magick and decides I ought to have the blocker?
Alan
