Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
On Friday 10 July 2015 23:48:40 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: how about not using an ancient kernel? 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 cov...@ccs.covici.com: Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get the following sometime after a boot: I'd hardly call 3.16 ancient, but it isn't a supported stable kernel. If you want longterm I'd stick with 3.18 or 3.14. Thanks, [any way] to tell which ones are supported? What's wrong with eix? It gives you a nice, easily understood list of all the current versions. -- Rgds Peter
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:48 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: how about not using an ancient kernel? 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 cov...@ccs.covici.com: Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get the following sometime after a boot: I'd hardly call 3.16 ancient, but it isn't a supported stable kernel. If you want longterm I'd stick with 3.18 or 3.14. Thanks, anyway to tell which ones are supported? The distributions are all over the place, ubunto is 3.13 and I think Debian Jessie is 3.16. Well, the stable versions in portage are supported by the Gentoo kernel team. I personally have started using upstream kernels, and the stable version of those can be found on kernel.org. If you want to run the really old series you're probably going to have to babysit things a lot more - recent versions of software like udev doesn't always support the old kernels (according to the Gentoo udev page it seems like udev 216+ is likely to have problems with pre-3.7 kernels). If you stick with an old non-longterm kernel you're not going to be getting security backports and fixes for regressions. But, as far as Gentoo support goes (such as it is), gentoo-sources is really the intended experience. -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 7:11 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote: On Friday 10 July 2015 23:48:40 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: I'd hardly call 3.16 ancient, but it isn't a supported stable kernel. If you want longterm I'd stick with 3.18 or 3.14. Thanks, [any way] to tell which ones are supported? What's wrong with eix? It gives you a nice, easily understood list of all the current versions. But it does not tell me which are supported. I use unstable gentoo amd so I have kernels up to 4.1 something -- whenever I do an update it gives me another one. It will show which ones are stable and which ones are not. In some sense anything in portage is supported, but if it isn't the highest version in a particular series you should consider it deprecated (ie the support is providing you the newer version to upgrade to). The kernel is slotted far more than most packages in Gentoo, and that reflects its importance, system call stability, and the degree to which upstream provides longterm support. -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote: On Friday 10 July 2015 23:48:40 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: how about not using an ancient kernel? 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 cov...@ccs.covici.com: Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get the following sometime after a boot: I'd hardly call 3.16 ancient, but it isn't a supported stable kernel. If you want longterm I'd stick with 3.18 or 3.14. Thanks, [any way] to tell which ones are supported? What's wrong with eix? It gives you a nice, easily understood list of all the current versions. But it does not tell me which are supported. I use unstable gentoo amd so I have kernels up to 4.1 something -- whenever I do an update it gives me another one. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici cov...@ccs.covici.com
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 07:52:17 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: What's wrong with eix? It gives you a nice, easily understood list of all the current versions. But it does not tell me which are supported. I use unstable gentoo amd so I have kernels up to 4.1 something -- whenever I do an update it gives me another one. It you want a stable kernel on an otherwise testing system, add this to /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords sys-kernel/gentoo-sources -~amd64 sys-kernel/linux-headers -~amd64 -- Neil Bothwick CW music backward: get yer dog, wife, job, truck, kids, and sobriety back. pgp5d4vXKwtQT.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
On 07/11/2015 01:22 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: What's wrong with eix? It gives you a nice, easily understood list of all the current versions. If you don't use eix (like me) there's always eshowkw (available in the gentoolkit package.) It shows packages, slots, and keywording for all arch combinations: ~ $ eshowkw gentoo-sources Keywords for sys-kernel/gentoo-sources: | | u | | a a a n p s | n | | l m r h i m m i p s p | u s | r | p d a m p a 6 i o p c 3 a x | s l | e | h 6 r 6 p 6 8 p s p 6 9 s r 8 | e o | p | a 4 m 4 a 4 k s 2 c 4 0 h c 6 | d t | o -+---+-+--- 3.4.106| ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | o 3.4.106 | gentoo -+---+-+--- 3.4.107| ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | o 3.4.107 | gentoo -+---+-+--- 3.4.| o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o | o 3.4. | gentoo -+---+-+--- 3.10.77| + + + o + + o ~ o + + ~ ~ + + | o 3.10.77 | gentoo --snip-- (There's a lot more output) Dan
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
On Saturday 11 July 2015 07:11:32 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote: On Friday 10 July 2015 23:48:40 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: how about not using an ancient kernel? 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 cov...@ccs.covici.com: Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get the following sometime after a boot: I'd hardly call 3.16 ancient, but it isn't a supported stable kernel. If you want longterm I'd stick with 3.18 or 3.14. Thanks, [any way] to tell which ones are supported? What's wrong with eix? It gives you a nice, easily understood list of all the current versions. But it does not tell me which are supported. I use unstable gentoo amd so I have kernels up to 4.1 something -- whenever I do an update it gives me another one. Any that aren't supported don't appear in the list. I don't know how your speakup arrangement works though, so you'd better ignore me. -- Rgds Peter
[gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get the following sometime after a boot: Jul 9 20:24:26 ccs.covici.com kernel: Disabling IRQ #16 This is preceeded by a call trace and on my consoles I see the additional message notody cares boot with irqpoll option. I did some googling and this seems to happen even in 3.19 kernels. So far the system has been still working, (I am not using a display manager right now), but it seems an instability and the funny thing is that irq 16 does have a handler -- here is the complete /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4 CPU5 CPU6 CPU7 0: 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 51549 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 9: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi 12: 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 16: 213194 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2 17: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi pata_marvell 18: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi i801_smbus 19: 602063 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi snd_emu10k1 23: 1889 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb4 48:6224537 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge ahci 49: 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge ahci 50: 31194512 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 51: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 52: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 53: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 54: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 55: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 56: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 57: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 58:1770753 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0 59: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth1 60:1672015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-rx-0 61:2889266 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-tx-0 62: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2 NMI:480259210211129132 138135 Non-maskable interrupts LOC: 101443384 104183840 103613415 102110376 99219886 100506540 98662481 96369343 Local timer interrupts SPU: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spurious interrupts PMI:480259210211129132 138135 Performance monitoring interrupts IWI: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IRQ work interrupts RTR: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APIC ICR read retries RES: 797796 82005 71556 71029 9728 19203 17339 16821 Rescheduling interrupts CAL:931 1389 1310 1398 1347980 1238 1247 Function call interrupts TLB: 11490 9816 8656 10847 5472 5196 6390 6533 TLB shootdowns TRM: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Thermal event interrupts THR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Threshold APIC interrupts MCE: 0 0 0 0 0 0
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
Would not do any good, the bug is still there under 3.19. Right now I am stuck with this one till I fix a bug in speakup. Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: how about not using an ancient kernel? 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 cov...@ccs.covici.com: Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get the following sometime after a boot: Jul 9 20:24:26 ccs.covici.com kernel: Disabling IRQ #16 This is preceeded by a call trace and on my consoles I see the additional message notody cares boot with irqpoll option. I did some googling and this seems to happen even in 3.19 kernels. So far the system has been still working, (I am not using a display manager right now), but it seems an instability and the funny thing is that irq 16 does have a handler -- here is the complete /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4 CPU5 CPU6 CPU7 0: 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 51549 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 9: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi 12: 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 16: 213194 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2 17: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi pata_marvell 18: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi i801_smbus 19: 602063 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi snd_emu10k1 23: 1889 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb4 48:6224537 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge ahci 49: 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge ahci 50: 31194512 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 51: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 52: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 53: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 54: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 55: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 56: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 57: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 58:1770753 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0 59: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth1 60:1672015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-rx-0 61:2889266 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-tx-0 62: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2 NMI:480259210211129132 138135 Non-maskable interrupts LOC: 101443384 104183840 103613415 102110376 99219886 100506540 98662481 96369343 Local timer interrupts SPU: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spurious interrupts PMI:480259210211129132 138135 Performance monitoring interrupts IWI: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IRQ work interrupts RTR: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APIC ICR read retries RES: 797796 82005 71556 71029 9728 19203 17339 16821 Rescheduling interrupts CAL:931 1389 1310 1398 1347980 1238 1247 Function call interrupts TLB: 11490 9816 8656 10847 5472 5196 6390 6533 TLB shootdowns TRM: 0
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
how about not using an ancient kernel? 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 cov...@ccs.covici.com: Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get the following sometime after a boot: Jul 9 20:24:26 ccs.covici.com kernel: Disabling IRQ #16 This is preceeded by a call trace and on my consoles I see the additional message notody cares boot with irqpoll option. I did some googling and this seems to happen even in 3.19 kernels. So far the system has been still working, (I am not using a display manager right now), but it seems an instability and the funny thing is that irq 16 does have a handler -- here is the complete /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4 CPU5 CPU6 CPU7 0: 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 51549 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 9: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi 12: 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 16: 213194 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2 17: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi pata_marvell 18: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi i801_smbus 19: 602063 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi snd_emu10k1 23: 1889 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb4 48:6224537 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge ahci 49: 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge ahci 50: 31194512 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 51: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 52: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 53: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 54: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 55: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 56: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 57: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd 58:1770753 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0 59: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth1 60:1672015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-rx-0 61:2889266 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-tx-0 62: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2 NMI:480259210211129132 138135 Non-maskable interrupts LOC: 101443384 104183840 103613415 102110376 99219886 100506540 98662481 96369343 Local timer interrupts SPU: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spurious interrupts PMI:480259210211129132 138135 Performance monitoring interrupts IWI: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IRQ work interrupts RTR: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APIC ICR read retries RES: 797796 82005 71556 71029 9728 19203 17339 16821 Rescheduling interrupts CAL:931 1389 1310 1398 1347980 1238 1247 Function call interrupts TLB: 11490 9816 8656 10847 5472 5196 6390 6533 TLB shootdowns TRM: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Thermal event interrupts THR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Threshold APIC interrupts MCE: 0 0 0
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: how about not using an ancient kernel? 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 cov...@ccs.covici.com: Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get the following sometime after a boot: I'd hardly call 3.16 ancient, but it isn't a supported stable kernel. If you want longterm I'd stick with 3.18 or 3.14. Thanks, anyway to tell which ones are supported? The distributions are all over the place, ubunto is 3.13 and I think Debian Jessie is 3.16. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici cov...@ccs.covici.com
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: how about not using an ancient kernel? 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 cov...@ccs.covici.com: Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get the following sometime after a boot: I'd hardly call 3.16 ancient, but it isn't a supported stable kernel. If you want longterm I'd stick with 3.18 or 3.14. -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
On Friday 10 July 2015 06:51:43 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Would not do any good, the bug is still there under 3.19. Right now I am stuck with this one till I fix a bug in speakup. Or you could just do what it says and add irqpoll to your kernel command line. I've had it there for yonks and not noticed any side effects. The last time I tried removing it was on a recent kernel, 3.high teens. I got the warning message so I put it back in. -- Rgds Peter
Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16
Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote: On Friday 10 July 2015 06:51:43 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Would not do any good, the bug is still there under 3.19. Right now I am stuck with this one till I fix a bug in speakup. Or you could just do what it says and add irqpoll to your kernel command line. I've had it there for yonks and not noticed any side effects. The last time I tried removing it was on a recent kernel, 3.high teens. I got the warning message so I put it back in. hmmm, my google search indicated that not working for some people, but I can certainly try it and see what happens. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici cov...@ccs.covici.com
