Re: [gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: I you still seeing that exact error message? Yes, I was - but that's because I did not set PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILFROM. After now having done so, all is fine. Alexander Skwar -- "Imitation is the sincerest form of television." -- The New Mighty Mouse -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
Alexander Skwar wrote: I'm using ssmtp and thus also have this problem. Is there any solution, which does NOT require patching portage, like suggested in the above mentioned bug? One of those patches is now integrated. Alexander Skwar -- FORTRAN is for pipe stress freaks and crystallography weenies. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
Friday 26 May 2006 12:03 skrev Alexander Skwar: > I'm using ssmtp and thus also have this problem. Is there any > solution, which does NOT require patching portage, like suggested > in the above mentioned bug? As I have stated to the bug report this issue was solved for me with portage 2.1_pre9-r4. I have not needed to patch portage since that release. I you still seeing that exact error message? Using portage 2.1_rc2-*? What does the following give on your computer? # grep ^PORTAGE_ELOG /etc/make.conf -- Bo Andresen pgpeFySEABZAM.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
Bo Andresen wrote:
Hi
I am having problems with the elog mail module failing to send mail due to the
following error:
"!!! An error occured while trying to send logmail:\n{'[EMAIL PROTECTED]':
(504, ': Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address')}"
I am using my ISP's SMTP server and it does work in mail program but
apparently it has some requirements to the sender address that aren't
fullfilled. My settings are as follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# grep LOG /etc/make.conf
PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="info warn error log"
PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save mail"
PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI="[EMAIL PROTECTED] vip.cybercity.dk"
I did notice bug #116637 (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116637) but
do not know whether it is the same as this bug. Does anyone know howto solve
this problem? Thanks in advance.
/Bo
Hi!
I'm using ssmtp and thus also have this problem. Is there any
solution, which does NOT require patching portage, like suggested
in the above mentioned bug?
I'd like to stay with a light weight MTA like ssmtp. It doesn't
have to be ssmtp, though...
Thanks,
Alexander Skwar
--
PENGUINICITY!!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 23:32, Bo Andresen wrote:
> > Your mail problem is addressed at
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116637
>
> Before I close this thread (now that I can get mails using the custom
> module), I would like to know whether someway knows an easy way in which to
> apply the patch proposed in the bug #116637?
Now (I think) I figured out how to patch it. Just copied the
portage-2.1_pre4-r1 to
an overlay, downloaded the patch to FILESDIR, added the following line to
src_unpack() and reemerged portage.
patch ${WORKDIR}/${PN}-${PV}/pym/elog_modules/mod_mail.py
${FILESDIR}/mod_mail.patch
It doesn't solve the problem at home though. As I understand it the error
message:
"!!! An error occured while trying to send logmail:\n{'[EMAIL PROTECTED]':
(504, ': Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address')}"
is the result of hostname -d returning nothing? I don't know how to solve that
problem.
Tomorrow will show whether the patch solves the problem at the universitet
network
where hostname -d does return a hostname that has been set up correctly be the
dhcp
server.
--
Bo Andresen
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 15:16, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> The example is wrong, because the variables are resolved when the conf
> file is sources. You need to put the whole command in single quotes, or
> escape the $ signs.
>
Sooo... /etc/make.conf.example contains this example:
#PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND="/path/to/logprocessor -p '${PACKAGE}' -f '${LOGFILE}'"
This is a bug, right? Should be:
#PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND="/path/to/logprocessor -p '\${PACKAGE}' -f
'\${LOGFILE}'"
Right?
> PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND='echo >>/mnt/scratch/logprocessor -p ${PACKAGE} -f
> ${LOGFILE}'
> will do what you want.
>
I don't quite understand this command but nevertheless it works. And so does
escaping the $ signs.
> Your mail problem is addressed at
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116637
Before I close this thread (now that I can get mails using the custom module),
I would like to know whether someway knows an easy way in which to apply the
patch proposed in the bug #116637?
But anyway, the custom module does work so thanks Neil. :D
--
Bo Andresen
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:42:26 +0100, Bo Andresen wrote:
> PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND="echo -p '${PACKAGE}' -f '${LOGFILE}'
> > /tmp/logprocessor"
>
> These modules are enabled:
> PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save custom syslog"
>
> For these classes:
> PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="info warn error log"
>
> After a successful emerge I get the corresponding logfile, output is
> printed to the syslog, however, the custom module prints nothing:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /tmp/logprocessor
> -p -f
The example is wrong, because the variables are resolved when the conf
file is sources. You need to put the whole command in single quotes, or
escape the $ signs.
PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND='echo >>/mnt/scratch/logprocessor -p ${PACKAGE} -f
${LOGFILE}'
will do what you want.
Your mail problem is addressed at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116637
--
Neil Bothwick
Weird enough for government work.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
Has anyone got this new elog mail module working? Or perhaps the elog custom
module. I just attempted to enable the custom module instead and insert this
elog command:
PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND="echo -p '${PACKAGE}' -f '${LOGFILE}'
> /tmp/logprocessor"
These modules are enabled:
PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save custom syslog"
For these classes:
PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="info warn error log"
After a successful emerge I get the corresponding logfile, output is printed
to the syslog, however, the custom module prints nothing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /tmp/logprocessor
-p -f
Does anyone know what I am doing wrong or can anyone direct me towards some
proper documentation. What I have done so far has been based on
make.conf.sample file in /etc. Searching on Google I didn't find much. :(
/Bo
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
> On Monday 06 February 2006 12:39, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Does hostname -d return the correct domain. If portage cannot determine > > the domain, it appears to send the mail from 'portage' instead of > > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Now I am back home again. The error message is again: "!!! An error occured while trying to send logmail:\n(501, ': sender address must contain a domain', 'portage')" And hostname -d returns naught. I don't know how to correct this problem. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# hostname BA [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# hostname -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# grep `hostname` /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost BA /Bo -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
This is a laptop which is being moved back and forth between home and university. When I wrote the previous mail I was at home. Now I am at the university. On Monday 06 February 2006 12:39, Neil Bothwick wrote: > Does hostname -d return the correct domain. If portage cannot determine > the domain, it appears to send the mail from 'portage' instead of > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# hostname -d stud.ies.auc.dk I will try the same command when I get home. Here at work, however, elog comes up with a different error ;) : "!!! An error occured while trying to send logmail:\n(501, ': sender address must contain a domain', 'portage')" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/conf.d/hostname HOSTNAME="BA" I don't think the my router/dhcp server overrides this hostname at home. And just in case it is of any use: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/conf.d/domainname # /etc/conf.d/domainname # When setting up resolv.conf, what should take precedence? # 0 = let dhcp/whatever override DNSDOMAIN # 1 = override dhcp/whatever with DNSDOMAIN OVERRIDE=0 DNSDOMAIN="" NISDOMAIN="" Thanks for your reply. /Bo -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:38:24 +0100, Bo Andresen wrote:
> I am having problems with the elog mail module failing to send mail due
> to the following error:
>
> "!!! An error occured while trying to send
> logmail:\n{'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': (504, ': Sender address
> rejected: need fully-qualified address')}"
Does hostname -d return the correct domain. If portage cannot determine
the domain, it appears to send the mail from 'portage' instead of
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
--
Neil Bothwick
This chicken has no beak, said Tom impeccably.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] logmail - need fully-qualified address
Hi
I am having problems with the elog mail module failing to send mail due to the
following error:
"!!! An error occured while trying to send logmail:\n{'[EMAIL PROTECTED]':
(504, ': Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address')}"
I am using my ISP's SMTP server and it does work in mail program but
apparently it has some requirements to the sender address that aren't
fullfilled. My settings are as follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# grep LOG /etc/make.conf
PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="info warn error log"
PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save mail"
PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI="[EMAIL PROTECTED] vip.cybercity.dk"
I did notice bug #116637 (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116637) but
do not know whether it is the same as this bug. Does anyone know howto solve
this problem? Thanks in advance.
/Bo
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
