Re: [gentoo-user] mailman 2.1 replacement? (Python 2.7 issue)

2020-09-06 Thread John Covici
Well, when trying to emerge mailman, I do get the masked packages
warning, but I can't get the bug, bugs.gentoo.org seems to be down.

On Sun, 06 Sep 2020 09:39:41 -0400,
John Covici wrote:
> 
> hmmm, in my /var/db/repos/gentoo/profile/packages.mask, I only have
> mailman3 as unmasked.  I am on the ~ tree, so that may make some
> difference.
> 
> On Sun, 06 Sep 2020 05:55:48 -0400,
> Matthias Hanft wrote:
> > 
> > Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > 
> > > Have you read https://bugs.gentoo.org/710134 ?
> > 
> > *Now* I have - thank you :-)
> > 
> > Unfortunately, there's no answer either. But I've added myself
> > to the Cc list and will monitor that thread.
> > 
> > -Matt
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
> How do
> you spend it?
> 
>  John Covici wb2una
>  cov...@ccs.covici.com
> 

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

 John Covici wb2una
 cov...@ccs.covici.com



Re: [gentoo-user] mailman 2.1 replacement? (Python 2.7 issue)

2020-09-06 Thread John Covici
hmmm, in my /var/db/repos/gentoo/profile/packages.mask, I only have
mailman3 as unmasked.  I am on the ~ tree, so that may make some
difference.

On Sun, 06 Sep 2020 05:55:48 -0400,
Matthias Hanft wrote:
> 
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > 
> > Have you read https://bugs.gentoo.org/710134 ?
> 
> *Now* I have - thank you :-)
> 
> Unfortunately, there's no answer either. But I've added myself
> to the Cc list and will monitor that thread.
> 
> -Matt
> 

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

 John Covici wb2una
 cov...@ccs.covici.com



Re: [gentoo-user] mailman 2.1 replacement? (Python 2.7 issue)

2020-09-06 Thread Matthias Hanft
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> 
> Have you read https://bugs.gentoo.org/710134 ?

*Now* I have - thank you :-)

Unfortunately, there's no answer either. But I've added myself
to the Cc list and will monitor that thread.

-Matt



Re: [gentoo-user] mailman 2.1 replacement? (Python 2.7 issue)

2020-09-06 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 10:59:42 +0200, Matthias Hanft wrote:

> On the other hand, there seems to be a mailman 3 version
> (which is not yet in the portage tree), but I could
> install it manually of course (though that sounds pretty
> complicated?!), and there are some update docs at
> https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/migration.html
> and there is a simple "mailman import21" command for
> importing the data of the old version. Would that be
> better/easier than to switch to a completely other
> system (even if the new mailman 3 would not be
> administered by portage)?

Have you read https://bugs.gentoo.org/710134 ?


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Pedestrians come in two types: Quick or Dead.


pgpK3p4yLbxii.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-user] mailman 2.1 replacement? (Python 2.7 issue)

2020-09-06 Thread Matthias Hanft
Hi,

I'm using mailman (stable 2.1.33) for several mailing lists.

Since there seems to be only a Python 2.7 version, mailman
is now masked and will soon be removed from the tree.

I have already copied the mailman ebuild to a local overlay,
but that's surely not the best idea in the long run.

What would the best (and simplest) solution to port the
existing mailman mailing lists to another mailing list
system (perhaps even with full-/half-automatic transfer
of e-mail-addresses, greeting and farewell messages and
all that)? Which one would you recommend?

Googling for "Alternatives to Mailman" found several
programs - the only one of them with a Gentoo ebuild
seems to be "mlmmj". Would porting the mailman data
to mlmmj be easy or difficult?

On the other hand, there seems to be a mailman 3 version
(which is not yet in the portage tree), but I could
install it manually of course (though that sounds pretty
complicated?!), and there are some update docs at
https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/migration.html
and there is a simple "mailman import21" command for
importing the data of the old version. Would that be
better/easier than to switch to a completely other
system (even if the new mailman 3 would not be
administered by portage)?

Any suggestions how to proceed?

Many thanks in advance,

-Matt