Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:33:12 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > "That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to > > know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those > > packages. > > a friend of mine was fucked by this stuff when he did an emerge -e > world after gcc update. That's what you get for running development code. I hope he filed a bug report ;-) -- Neil Bothwick Copper wire was invented by two Scotsmen fighting over a penny! signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast
On Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2008, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: > on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following: > > On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as > >> opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take ! > >> > >> I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour? > > > > or you are a victim of that new preserved-libs stuff in portage > > s/victim/beneficiary/ > > "That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to > know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those > packages. a friend of mine was fucked by this stuff when he did an emerge -e world after gcc update.
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast
Vladimir G. Ivanovic schrieb: http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2008/06/portage-22-preserve-libs-features.html NOw I got the idea behind the preserve-libs thing. Where are the lists of packages which are in this set saved? Or are they generated on the fly? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast
http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2008/06/portage-22-preserve-libs-features.html and http://blog.flameeyes.eu/articles/2008/06/30/a-few-risks-i-see-related-to-the-new-portage-2-2-preserve-libs-behaviour http://blog.flameeyes.eu/articles/2008/07/22/the-odyssey-of-preserved-libs-feature Google (for now) is your friend. --- Vladimir on 07/23/2008 09:04 AM Andrew Gaydenko said the following: === On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: === on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following: On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: Hi all, revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take ! I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour? or you are a victim of that new preserved-libs stuff in portage Is there somewhere some information about this "preserved-libs"? Wiki has not found anything. s/victim/beneficiary/ "That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those packages. --- Vladimir -- Vladimir G. Ivanovic signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast
=== On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: === > on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following: > > On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as > >> opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take ! > >> > >> I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour? > > > > or you are a victim of that new preserved-libs stuff in portage Is there somewhere some information about this "preserved-libs"? Wiki has not found anything. > > s/victim/beneficiary/ > > "That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to > know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those > packages. > > --- Vladimir
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast
on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following: On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: Hi all, revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take ! I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour? or you are a victim of that new preserved-libs stuff in portage s/victim/beneficiary/ "That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those packages. --- Vladimir -- Vladimir G. Ivanovic signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast
On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Hi all, > > revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as > opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take ! > > I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour? > or you are a victim of that new preserved-libs stuff in portage -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan McKinnon wrote: | I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour? Yes. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiBm2MACgkQZsUt7MqpQk3cNACfYhRDVobWtPI8rS9suR5g5Gyh 4e4AoNWgnB4jXyON/D5ZIrnCYvEgcZGo =kVgF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast
Hi all, revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take ! I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour? -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
