[gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade packages!
Hi. I just emerged the firefox 3.0 which required a new version also of xulrunner. Now if I run revdep-rebuild, it wants to downgrade both of these packages. A number of packages seem to depend on libnss3.so.11 libsmime3.so.11 libssl3.so.11 . How can I resolve this conflict? Thanks in advance for any ideas on this. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade packages!
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:33:10 -0400, John covici wrote: Hi. I just emerged the firefox 3.0 which required a new version also of xulrunner. Now if I run revdep-rebuild, it wants to downgrade both of these packages. xulrunner is slotted, so you may need 1.8 and 1.9 installed. Packages built with -xulrunner in USE generally depend on firefox2, so make sure you have xulrunner in your global USE flags, and no -xulrunner entries in /etc/portage/package.use. -- Neil Bothwick Portable: Survives system reboot. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade packages!
John covici wrote: Hi. I just emerged the firefox 3.0 which required a new version also of xulrunner. Now if I run revdep-rebuild, it wants to downgrade both of these packages. A number of packages seem to depend on libnss3.so.11 libsmime3.so.11 libssl3.so.11 . How can I resolve this conflict? Thanks in advance for any ideas on this. I believe you want to run revdep-rebuild with the -X option flag. Also make sure you're using the xulrunner use flag instead of the firefox use flag. --Joshua Doll -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade packages!
on Thursday 07/10/2008 Joshua D Doll([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote John covici wrote: Hi. I just emerged the firefox 3.0 which required a new version also of xulrunner. Now if I run revdep-rebuild, it wants to downgrade both of these packages. A number of packages seem to depend on libnss3.so.11 libsmime3.so.11 libssl3.so.11 . How can I resolve this conflict? Thanks in advance for any ideas on this. I believe you want to run revdep-rebuild with the -X option flag. Also make sure you're using the xulrunner use flag instead of the firefox use flag. OK, that helped a lot, it still reports some evolution packages are broke, but it does not rebuild them -- I don't use evolution much anyway, so maybe it will get fixed in the next update. Thanks much. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade packages!
Am Donnerstag, 10. Juli 2008 schrieb ext John covici: Hi. I just emerged the firefox 3.0 which required a new version also of xulrunner. Now if I run revdep-rebuild, it wants to downgrade both of these packages. A number of packages seem to depend on libnss3.so.11 libsmime3.so.11 libssl3.so.11 . How can I resolve this conflict? Thanks in advance for any ideas on this. I had this because of OpenOffice, which was emerged with firefox use flag. In this case it wants firefox 2. I replaced the firefox use flag with xulrunner and everything was fine. HTH... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wanheimerstraße 68 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40468 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: wwwkeys.pgp.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
