Aw: Re: [gentoo-user] slot conflict when updating portage

[n952162]

Oh, I wish I'd use .txt as an extension.  Here's one in the raw:


10~>sudo emerge   --oneshot portage
Password: 

!!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore.
!!! Use eselect profile to update your profile.
!!! Please upgrade to the following profile if possible:

default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop

You may use the following command to upgrade:

eselect profile set default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop


 * IMPORTANT: 6 news items need reading for repository 'gentoo'.
 * Use eselect news read to view new items.


 * IMPORTANT: 26 config files in '/etc/portage' need updating.
 * See the CONFIGURATION FILES and CONFIGURATION FILES UPDATE TOOLS
 * sections of the emerge man page to learn how to update config files.
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  N ] app-crypt/openpgp-keys-gentoo-release-20190427  USE="{-test}" 
[ebuild  N ] dev-python/bz2file-0.98  PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 (-pypy)" 
[ebuild U  ] dev-libs/libgpg-error-1.29 [1.27-r1]
[ebuild  NS] dev-lang/python-3.6.5 [2.7.14-r1, 3.5.4-r1] USE="gdbm ipv6 
ncurses readline ssl (threads) xml -build -examples -hardened -libressl -sqlite 
{-test} -tk -wininst" 
[ebuild U  ] dev-python/setuptools-40.6.3 [36.7.2] 
PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_6* -python3_5* (-python3_7)" 
[ebuild U  ] dev-python/certifi-2018.4.16 [2017.4.17] 
PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_6* -python3_5* (-python3_7)" 
[ebuild U  ] app-crypt/gnupg-2.2.10 [2.2.4] USE="ssl%*" 
[ebuild  N ] app-portage/gemato-14.1  USE="blake2 bzip2 gpg -lzma -sha3 
{-test} -tools" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_6 (-pypy) -python3_5 
(-python3_7)" 
[ebuild U ~] sys-apps/portage-2.3.67 [2.3.13-r1] USE="rsync-verify%* 
-gentoo-dev%" PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_6* -python3_5* -python3_7%" 

!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:

sys-apps/portage:0

  (sys-apps/portage-2.3.67:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
sys-apps/portage (Argument)

  (sys-apps/portage-2.3.13-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by

sys-apps/portage[python_targets_python2_7(-),python_targets_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-)]
 required by (app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.0:0/0::gentoo, installed)




  

dev-python/setuptools:0

  (dev-python/setuptools-40.6.3:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled 
in by

dev-python/setuptools[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,python_targets_python3_6(-)?,python_targets_python3_7(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python3_7(-)]
 required by (app-portage/gemato-14.1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)





   

dev-python/setuptools[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_pypy3(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,python_targets_python3_6(-)?,python_targets_python3_7(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python3_7(-)]
 required by (dev-python/certifi-2018.4.16:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for 
merge)








>=dev-python/setuptools-34[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,python_targets_python3_6(-)?,python_targets_python3_7(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target

Aw: Re: [gentoo-user] slot conflict when updating portage

[n952162]

Okay, gladly.  In fact, I ran it 3 times, one after another, because I wasn't 
even sure if there were fatal problems or not ... trying to attach these text 
files...

But I'm going to bed then.  Good night.


> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2019 um 00:38 Uhr
> Von: "Dale" 
> An: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Betreff: Re: [gentoo-user] slot conflict when updating portage
>
> n952...@web.de wrote:
> > !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
> > !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
> >
> > sys-apps/portage:0
> >
> > How should I go about handling this?
> >
> > Slot are explained somewhere as allowing multiple packages to have 
> > different versions of the same providing package.  Why should there be 
> > conflicts?  Is there a limited number of slots or something?  Why is a slot 
> > conflict a problem - each dependent package can use its own slot ...
> >
> > Following this message there are a number of "paragraphs", each introduced 
> > with a line like the "sys-apps/portage:0" line, above.  Each paragraph 
> > contains multiple "clauses", apparently representing different versions of 
> > the package starting the "paragraph"
> >
> > Each seems to be terminated with a status:
> > - argument
> > - installed
> > - ebuild scheduled for merge
> >
> > Where's the problem?
> >
> > There must be a problem because it goes on to say:
> >
> > "It may be possible to solve this problem by using package.mask to
> > prevent one of those packages from being selected. However, it is also
> > possible that conflicting dependencies exist such that they are
> > impossible to satisfy simultaneously.  If such a conflict exists in
> > the dependencies of two different packages, then those packages can
> > not be installed simultaneously."
> >
> > I can solve the problem by preventing *one* of the packages from being 
> > selected?
> > Let's see, I have 3 such paragraphs, two with 2 clauses each and one with 6 
> > clauses.  If I pick one, everything will be fine?
> >
> > It then suggests looking at the MASKED PACKAGES section of the emerge man 
> > page.  But that has to do with experimental or development packages.  My 
> > profile is "stable" - there's no reason why I should have any of those, is 
> > there?
> >
> > It goes on, but I think those are other issues which I will raise in a 
> > subsequent post.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> You need to post the whole output so others can see what is causing the
> conflict.  There are a few on this list who are very good at parsing the
> output and finding a way to work through it. 
> 
> Dale
> 
> :-) :-) 
> 
>

emerge-0.out
Description: Binary data


emerge-1.out
Description: Binary data


emerge-2.out
Description: Binary data