Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:59:20PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2017-05-23 23:16, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > KDE doesn’t find my beloved terminus font anymore, both on my PC and > > my laptop. It does not show up in any font selection dialog. The same > > goes for GTK applications such as gimp (GTK2) and firefox (GTK3). No > > Terminus anywhere. > > > > Does that ring a bell with anyone? > > Yes: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618918 > > I seem to scent a faint Poettering type hormone in the air around > freetype :-( Ah, thank you very very much. I’ll be offline for the next few days and it’s nice to know a solution. Coulda thunk myself to look at bgo. -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. The boss is a human just like everyone else, he just doesn’t know. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug
On Saturday 20 May 2017 18:39:07 Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Sat, 20 May 2017 16:36:08 +0100 > > schrieb Mick: > > On Saturday 20 May 2017 10:48:52 Mick wrote: > > > On Saturday 20 May 2017 03:19:20 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > > On Saturday 20 May 2017 00:26:58 Kai Krakow wrote: > > [...] > > [...] > > [...] > > [...] > > [...] > > [...] > > > > > > After all that, KMail now works as it did before. > > > > [...] > > > > > > Mick might like to try that, perhaps. I assume the effect will be > > > > the same. > > > > > > Thanks Peter. First PC is going through it. 91 packages! > > > > It seems revdep-rebuild'ing against library='libQtCore.so.4' also > > rebuilds the newly installed Qt packages. This is why there so many > > packages to rebuild. > > That's why I suggested using "--changed-deps": It doesn't rebuild > packages that provide the library itself and have already been built > after the library provider... > > OTOH, it doesn't check binary dependence, just what is written into the > ebuilds itself. But it should work most of the time. > > A combination of two emerge invocations may work, too: > > # emerge -DNua world --changed-deps > # emerge -1a @preserved-rebuild --changed-deps > > This also worked well for me when I did the gcc upgrade. > > But I think the need to use changed-deps to rebuild dependers should be > considered a bug and be reported. Portage has support for sub-slot > dependencies to describe such binary breakage during upgrades and > automatically rebuild the dependers. Have you seen https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595618 ? It says that "Qt plugins compiled with gcc-4 are incompatible with
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug
On Saturday 20 May 2017 16:36:08 Mick wrote: > It seems revdep-rebuild'ing against library='libQtCore.so.4' also rebuilds > the newly installed Qt packages. This is why there so many packages to > rebuild. I hadn't notice that, but now you mention it I had 14 dev-qt packages, 41 kde-apps and 3 kde-plasma among my 71. All's well that ends well. -- Regards Peter
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug
On Saturday 20 May 2017 10:48:52 Mick wrote: > On Saturday 20 May 2017 03:19:20 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Saturday 20 May 2017 00:26:58 Kai Krakow wrote: > > > Am Fri, 19 May 2017 22:50:06 +0100 > > > > > > schrieb Peter Humphrey: > > > > On Friday 19 May 2017 15:15:24 Mick wrote: > > > > > On Friday 19 May 2017 13:43:24 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > > > > > > > Today's update broke KMail. 15 dev-qt packages were upgraded from > > > > > > 4.8.6 to 4.8.7, and when I logged out, restarted xdm and logged > > > > > > in again, KMail's folder list showed all the folders in red, and > > > > > > the other two panes were blank. Akonadiconsole showed the LAN > > > > > > Mail agent offline, broken. > > > > > > > > > > > > In case anyone else falls over this one, I've raised this bug; > > > > > > it's been confirmed by one other user so far: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618922 > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone found a fix for this? > > > > > > > > > > I haven't run an update yet, but thank you for bringing this to our > > > > > attention. I'll stay put on 4.8.6-r2, until the bug is resolved. > > > > > > > > Apparently, a revdep-rebuild fixes it: revdep-rebuild -- > > > > library='libQtCore.so.4' > > > > > > > > 71 packages! See you in the morning - I don't intend to sit and wait > > > > while the likes of qtwebkit and libreoffice compiling. > > > > After all that, KMail now works as it did before. > > > > > You could try "emerge -DNua world --changed-deps" to fix such problems. > > > It should work even when already upgraded. > > > > Mick might like to try that, perhaps. I assume the effect will be the > > same. > > Thanks Peter. First PC is going through it. 91 packages! It seems revdep-rebuild'ing against library='libQtCore.so.4' also rebuilds the newly installed Qt packages. This is why there so many packages to rebuild. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug
On Saturday 20 May 2017 03:19:20 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 20 May 2017 00:26:58 Kai Krakow wrote: > > Am Fri, 19 May 2017 22:50:06 +0100 > > > > schrieb Peter Humphrey: > > > On Friday 19 May 2017 15:15:24 Mick wrote: > > > > On Friday 19 May 2017 13:43:24 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > > > > > Today's update broke KMail. 15 dev-qt packages were upgraded from > > > > > 4.8.6 to 4.8.7, and when I logged out, restarted xdm and logged > > > > > in again, KMail's folder list showed all the folders in red, and > > > > > the other two panes were blank. Akonadiconsole showed the LAN > > > > > Mail agent offline, broken. > > > > > > > > > > In case anyone else falls over this one, I've raised this bug; > > > > > it's been confirmed by one other user so far: > > > > > > > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618922 > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone found a fix for this? > > > > > > > > I haven't run an update yet, but thank you for bringing this to our > > > > attention. I'll stay put on 4.8.6-r2, until the bug is resolved. > > > > > > Apparently, a revdep-rebuild fixes it: revdep-rebuild -- > > > library='libQtCore.so.4' > > > > > > 71 packages! See you in the morning - I don't intend to sit and wait > > > while the likes of qtwebkit and libreoffice compiling. > > After all that, KMail now works as it did before. > > > You could try "emerge -DNua world --changed-deps" to fix such problems. > > It should work even when already upgraded. > > Mick might like to try that, perhaps. I assume the effect will be the same. Thanks Peter. First PC is going through it. 91 packages! -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug
On Saturday 20 May 2017 00:26:58 Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Fri, 19 May 2017 22:50:06 +0100 > > schrieb Peter Humphrey: > > On Friday 19 May 2017 15:15:24 Mick wrote: > > > On Friday 19 May 2017 13:43:24 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > > > Today's update broke KMail. 15 dev-qt packages were upgraded from > > > > 4.8.6 to 4.8.7, and when I logged out, restarted xdm and logged > > > > in again, KMail's folder list showed all the folders in red, and > > > > the other two panes were blank. Akonadiconsole showed the LAN > > > > Mail agent offline, broken. > > > > > > > > In case anyone else falls over this one, I've raised this bug; > > > > it's been confirmed by one other user so far: > > > > > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618922 > > > > > > > > Has anyone found a fix for this? > > > > > > I haven't run an update yet, but thank you for bringing this to our > > > attention. I'll stay put on 4.8.6-r2, until the bug is resolved. > > > > Apparently, a revdep-rebuild fixes it: revdep-rebuild -- > > library='libQtCore.so.4' > > > > 71 packages! See you in the morning - I don't intend to sit and wait > > while the likes of qtwebkit and libreoffice compiling. After all that, KMail now works as it did before. > You could try "emerge -DNua world --changed-deps" to fix such problems. > It should work even when already upgraded. Mick might like to try that, perhaps. I assume the effect will be the same. -- Regards Peter