Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge @preserved-rebuild failure
În ziua de duminică, 7 ianuarie 2018, la 03:09:32 EET, Mart Raudsepp a scris:
> > To me this reads as readline-7.0_p3 depends on libs from readline-
> > 6.3.
> >
> > Smells a bit as some sort of bug. Try rebuilding readline?
> >
> > This didn't happen here when readline was bumped.
>
> This is no bug here. It's just storing the fact that it preserved these
> /lib64/libreadline.so.6{,.3} under the replacing newer version package.
> That is, readline-7.0_p3 now owns these files, but based on this
> registry, they will be deleted and removed from its CONTENTS, once
> there are no more consumers of it based on essentially NEEDED.ELF.2
> contents in the VDB (/var/db/pkg/*/*/NEEDED.ELF.2).
> That is, what is keeping them from being removed is not stored in this
> registry.
Thanks for the in-depth explanation. Do you think that revdep-rebuild would've
helped here?
And a bit off-topic for this thread (but it's a subject that interests me):
does the preserved rebuild feature track user installed programs (outside of
portage control)?
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge @preserved-rebuild failure
On Sat, 2018-01-06 at 23:42 +0200, zless wrote:
> În ziua de sâmbătă, 6 ianuarie 2018, la 23:25:32 EET, Hartmut Figge a
> scris:
> > zless:
> > > Could you also take a look at the file
> > > /var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry ?
> >
> > hafi@i5-64 ~ $ cat /var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry
> > {
> > "sys-libs/readline:0": [
> > "sys-libs/readline-7.0_p3",
> > "10658",
> > [
> > "/lib64/libreadline.so.6.3",
> > "/lib64/libreadline.so.6"
> > ]
> > ]
> >
>
> To me this reads as readline-7.0_p3 depends on libs from readline-
> 6.3.
>
> Smells a bit as some sort of bug. Try rebuilding readline?
>
> This didn't happen here when readline was bumped.
This is no bug here. It's just storing the fact that it preserved these
/lib64/libreadline.so.6{,.3} under the replacing newer version package.
That is, readline-7.0_p3 now owns these files, but based on this
registry, they will be deleted and removed from its CONTENTS, once
there are no more consumers of it based on essentially NEEDED.ELF.2
contents in the VDB (/var/db/pkg/*/*/NEEDED.ELF.2).
That is, what is keeping them from being removed is not stored in this
registry.
> > > It's like this when there are no preserved libs:
> > >
> > > # cat preserved_libs_registry
> >
> > I'm currently running 'find . -name '*preserved*' on / in the hope
> > of
> > finding the set with the preserverd libs *g* Well, I will let it
> > continue.
Maybe there is just an old ruby:2.1 SLOT installed, that hasn't been
properly depcleaned?
Mart
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge @preserved-rebuild failure
În ziua de sâmbătă, 6 ianuarie 2018, la 23:51:59 EET, Hartmut Figge a scris: > Hrm. Replacing the obviously corrupt preserved_libs_registry with the > clean one from my backup? That would be the end of the investigation. You could also check if those readline-6 preserved libs really exist: /lib64/libreadline.so.6.3 /lib64/libreadline.so.6 Try renaming them or backing them up somewhere else and see if realine applications (bash) still work fine after that. Other than that... I'd fill a bug about this ;)
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge @preserved-rebuild failure
În ziua de sâmbătă, 6 ianuarie 2018, la 23:25:32 EET, Hartmut Figge a scris:
> zless:
> >Could you also take a look at the file
> >/var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry ?
>
> hafi@i5-64 ~ $ cat /var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry
> {
> "sys-libs/readline:0": [
> "sys-libs/readline-7.0_p3",
> "10658",
> [
> "/lib64/libreadline.so.6.3",
> "/lib64/libreadline.so.6"
> ]
> ]
>
To me this reads as readline-7.0_p3 depends on libs from readline-6.3.
Smells a bit as some sort of bug. Try rebuilding readline?
This didn't happen here when readline was bumped.
> >It's like this when there are no preserved libs:
> >
> ># cat preserved_libs_registry
>
> I'm currently running 'find . -name '*preserved*' on / in the hope of
> finding the set with the preserverd libs *g* Well, I will let it continue.
>
> Hartmut
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge @preserved-rebuild failure
În ziua de sâmbătă, 6 ianuarie 2018, la 23:04:21 EET, Hartmut Figge a scris:
> There is no rest. I can give the whole output for the last emerge
> command which ended with the above line. Doubt that will be helpful.
Could you also take a look at the file
/var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry ?
It's like this when there are no preserved libs:
# cat preserved_libs_registry
{}
