Re: [gentoo-user] hal-0.5.5.1-r3 dependency loop

2006-01-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:21:54 -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote:

 Looks like there is a dependency loop with the
 recently unmasked hal-0.5.5.1-r3. If I:

It's not a loop. KDE 3.4 depends on the older HAL (0.4x) and D-BUS. if you
update to HAL 0.5+, KDE 3.4 will want to downgrade it again. This should
only be a problem if you have 3.4 and 3.5 installed, otherwise, just
stick with the version suitable for KDE.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Oxymoron: Reagan memoirs.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] hal-0.5.5.1-r3 dependency loop

2006-01-23 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote:

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:21:54 -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote:

  

Looks like there is a dependency loop with the
recently unmasked hal-0.5.5.1-r3. If I:



It's not a loop. KDE 3.4 depends on the older HAL (0.4x) and D-BUS. if you
update to HAL 0.5+, KDE 3.4 will want to downgrade it again. This should
only be a problem if you have 3.4 and 3.5 installed, otherwise, just
stick with the version suitable for KDE.


  


So that is what has been going on with mine too.  I thought I was going
nuts, again that is.  LOL

Dale
:-)

-- 
To err is human, I'm most certainly human.

I have four rigs:

1:  Home built; Abit NF7 ver 2.0 w/ AMD 2500+ CPU, 1GB of ram and right now two 
80GB hard drives.  Named Smoker
2:  Home built; Iwill KK266-R w/ AMD 1GHz CPU, 256MBs of ram and a 4GB drive.  
Named Swifty
3:  Home built; Gigabyte GA-71XE4 w/ 800MHz CPU, 224MBs of ram and a 2.5GB 
drive.  Named Pokey
4:  Compaq Proliant 6000 Server w/ Quad 200MHz CPUs, 128MBs of ram and a 4.3GB 
SCSI drive.  Named Putput

All run Gentoo Linux, all run folding. #1 is my desktop, 2, 3, and 4 are set up 
as servers.  

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] hal-0.5.5.1-r3 dependency loop

2006-01-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:15:06 -0600, Dale wrote:

 So that is what has been going on with mine too.  I thought I was going
 nuts, again that is.  LOL

You are, I explained that to you last week :)


-- 
Neil Bothwick

This is as bad as it can get-but don't bet on it.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] hal-0.5.5.1-r3 dependency loop

2006-01-23 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Sunday 22 January 2006 11:35 pm, Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:21:54 -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote:
  Looks like there is a dependency loop with the
  recently unmasked hal-0.5.5.1-r3. If I:

 It's not a loop. KDE 3.4 depends on the older HAL (0.4x) and D-BUS. if you
 update to HAL 0.5+, KDE 3.4 will want to downgrade it again. This should
 only be a problem if you have 3.4 and 3.5 installed, otherwise, just
 stick with the version suitable for KDE.

I have not installed 3.5:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ eix kde|grep -i installed.*3\.5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ eix kde|grep -i installed.*3\.4
 Installed:   3.4.3
 Installed:   3.4.3
 Installed:   3.4.3
 Installed:   3.4.3
 Installed:   3.4.3-r1
 Installed:   3.4.3-r10
 Installed:   3.4.3
 Installed:   3.4.3-r3
 Installed:   3.4.3-r1
 Installed:   3.4.3
 Installed:   3.4.3
 Installed:   3.4.3
 Installed:   3.4.3
 Installed:   3.4.3-r1
 Installed:   3.4.3-r1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $

How can I find the package calling for the newer hal?

-- 
Aloha = Beau;

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] hal-0.5.5.1-r3 dependency loop

2006-01-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:40:16 -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote:

 How can I find the package calling for the newer hal?

emerge --tree --verbose --update --deep world


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Smoking Can Damage Your HealthUnless us Non-Smokers do it first!


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] hal-0.5.5.1-r3 dependency loop

2006-01-23 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:15:06 -0600, Dale wrote:

  

So that is what has been going on with mine too.  I thought I was going
nuts, again that is.  LOL



You are, I explained that to you last week :)


  



I must have missed the part about having both KDEs though.  My ISP is
driving me nuts.  I'm trying to download the stuff for a new install. 
It's just really slow on a 24K connection.  Once I get this done, I'm
switching ISPs, at least for a while anyway.  I wish I had DSL.  Sorry
Bell South.  Cheap butt heads won't replace the 20 year old switch box
so we can have DSL.  Makes me mad!!!

Back in my hole while I download for another 5 hours or so.  Let's see
if I can send email with this connection. 

Dale
:-)

-- 
To err is human, I'm most certainly human.

I have four rigs:

1:  Home built; Abit NF7 ver 2.0 w/ AMD 2500+ CPU, 1GB of ram and right now two 
80GB hard drives.  Named Smoker
2:  Home built; Iwill KK266-R w/ AMD 1GHz CPU, 256MBs of ram and a 4GB drive.  
Named Swifty
3:  Home built; Gigabyte GA-71XE4 w/ 800MHz CPU, 224MBs of ram and a 2.5GB 
drive.  Named Pokey
4:  Compaq Proliant 6000 Server w/ Quad 200MHz CPUs, 128MBs of ram and a 4.3GB 
SCSI drive.  Named Putput

All run Gentoo Linux, all run folding. #1 is my desktop, 2, 3, and 4 are set up 
as servers.  


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list