Re[6]: [gentoo-user] How packages becomes stable?

[Robert Cernansky]

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:40:23 -0700 Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RF On 7/26/06, Robert Cernansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RF  On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:58:23 -0700 Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RF 
RF  RF On 7/25/06, Robert Cernansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RF  RF  Of course I can but I want to point out that this should
RF  RF  happen occasionally. I reported several packages to be
RF  RF  keyworded for amd64 year ago and none of them is stable yet. 
RF  RF  So it seems to me that this is not bug, this is a rule.
RF  RF
RF  RF Are these packages stable for x86?
RF 
RF  Yes, they are stable for x86.
RF 
RF Can you give an example or two?

net-im/tkabber
..and its dependencies:
dev-tcltk/tclgpgme
dev-tcltk/tclxml
dev-tcltk/tclxml-expat
dev-tcltk/tkTheme
dev-tcltk/tkXwin

app-text/cwtext
app-text/txt2pdbdoc
net-analyzer/etherape
app-emacs/table
x11-plugins/wmweather+
x11-plugins/docker
app-mobilephone/scmxx

app-emulation/fuse (no maintainer)
app-emulation/libspectrum
x11-plugins/mountapp
app-mobilephone/smssend

Robert


-- 
Robert Cernansky
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: Re[6]: [gentoo-user] How packages becomes stable?

[Richard Fish]

On 7/26/06, Robert Cernansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:40:23 -0700 Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RF On 7/26/06, Robert Cernansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RF  On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:58:23 -0700 Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RF  RF On 7/25/06, Robert Cernansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RF  RF Are these packages stable for x86?
RF 
RF  Yes, they are stable for x86.
RF
RF Can you give an example or two?

net-im/tkabber
..and its dependencies:


I've raised the question on -dev in a hopefully constructive manner.
Let's see what happens there.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/40719/focus=40719

-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list