Re: [gentoo-user] Disk quota and LDAP
Am Montag, 7. August 2006 19:43 schrieb ext Leandro Melo de Sales: Ok... but I can't you any good reason to not have this information on ldap. You can get the information with the quota tools anytime, for any given filesystem. This is the only place where the correct quota value is stored, in the filesystems. Putting it into another database of any kind would mean to make sure it's up to date every time quota changes for any user on any filesystem on any machine you have. What for??? What's the difference in querying one db or the other? Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net pgpSm3F0CTuHL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] writable devices being mounted as read only
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: well, if you mount a burnt blank, it has to be read only. Empty blanks can not be mounted. So everything seems to be ok. And if you want to write to a +rw blank, you don't mount them too. AFAIR of course. But you do mount a DVD-RAM. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Disk quota and LDAP
For management issues! :) 2006/8/8, Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Montag, 7. August 2006 19:43 schrieb ext Leandro Melo de Sales: Ok... but I can't you any good reason to not have this information on ldap. You can get the information with the quota tools anytime, for any given filesystem. This is the only place where the correct quota value is stored, in the filesystems. Putting it into another database of any kind would mean to make sure it's up to date every time quota changes for any user on any filesystem on any machine you have. What for??? What's the difference in querying one db or the other? Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net -- Leandro Melo de Sales. Computer Science MSc Candidate Distributed System Lab - lsd.ufcg.edu.br Pervasive Computing Lab - embedded.ufcg.edu.br Universidade Federal de Campina Grande - UFCG -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] writable devices being mounted as read only
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 00:57 schrieb ext Hemmann, Volker Armin: On Monday 07 August 2006 21:49, sean wrote: Hello All, Whenever I mount my USB DVD writer or my SCSI cd-rom writer I always get the following similar message for either device, root or otherwise. mount /mnt/dvd/ mount: block device /dev/sr1 is write-protected, mounting read-only This is just a hint for you. /dev/sr1 is a read-only device per definition. Both devices in my fstab have 'noauto,user,rw' but still the write only message. You can't enable things which are not there. A read-only device will stay read-only no matter what you put in fstab. well, if you mount a burnt blank, it has to be read only. Empty blanks can not be mounted. So everything seems to be ok. And if you want to write to a +rw blank, you don't mount them too. AFAIR of course. That clearly depends on the filesystem you use. If you use iso9660, you have to create an image which is burnt to the disc unmounted. However, if you use UDF on RW media (CD or DVD), you create a device mapping via pktcdvd.ko and pktsetup and mount the disc just like anything else. Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net pgp2eTzJsU1Wq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Disk quota and LDAP
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 08:14 schrieb ext Leandro Melo de Sales: For management issues! :) You can't manage quota with LDAP. Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net pgplUZktFpCCG.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] [OT] Time Machine and Spaces in Apple OS X 10.5 Leopard
http://dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3694 What would be really, really nice is a Gentoo system with a virtual OS X 10.5 system running in it, but I haven't seen any supported virtualization products for OS X. --- Vladimir -- Vladimir G. Ivanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] cdk: BUILD ERROR
On 8/7/06, Meino Christian Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: make: *** [libcdk.la] Error 1 fix_libtool_files.sh -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] cdk: BUILD ERROR
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:44:30 +0200 (CEST), Meino Christian Cramer wrote: i386-pc-linux-gnu-g++: /usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/crtendS.o: No such f ile or directory i386-pc-linux-gnu-g++: /usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/../../../crtn.o: No such file or directory Run fix_libto for more information.ol_files.sh 3.4.4. This is a FAQ so search the list archives for fix_libtool_files.sh -- Neil Bothwick WinErr 678: This will end your Windows session. Do you want to play another game? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
AW: [gentoo-user] execution of a script right before umount -a at shutdown/reboot
What is the most gentoo compliant place for executing a small script
right before the 'umount -a' on shutdown/halt of the system ?
Create an init script into /etc/init.d/ which contains following:
depend() {
need localmount
}
Regards
Sebastian Noack
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] cdk: BUILD ERROR
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 10:37 +0200, Meino Christian Cramer wrote: I tried this before...it does not help. gcc 3.4.4 is still referenced by the cdk build process (or what else...) Try emerge --oneshot libtool. -- Keith Kastorff [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] ERROR: x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7 failed.
Hi there! I have some trouble with emerging x11-base/xorg-x11. I tried to run emerge -avD x11-base/xorg-x11 and it wants to install x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7 USE=dri ipv6 -debug -minimal -xprint as the first package on the list, which fails, saying: !!! ERROR: x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1539: Called dyn_compile ebuild.sh, line 939: Called src_compile ebuild.sh, line 1248: Called x-modular_src_compile x-modular.eclass, line 330: Called x-modular_src_make x-modular.eclass, line 325: Called die !!! emake failed !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. Any ideas what to do? If so, please consider me a gentoo-dummie. At the moment I do not have installed any x11-base/xorg-x11. My old version (6.9) blocked my system update (emerge -avuD system). That's why I thoght it might be a good idea to deinstall it, update the system and then reinstall the new version. Maybe it wasn't such a good idea... Please help! grottenolm. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
AW: [gentoo-user] ERROR: x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7 failed.
I have some trouble with emerging x11-base/xorg-x11. I tried to run emerge -avD x11-base/xorg-x11 -D affects only something if you pass also -u. !!! ERROR: x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1539: Called dyn_compile ebuild.sh, line 939: Called src_compile ebuild.sh, line 1248: Called x-modular_src_compile x-modular.eclass, line 330: Called x-modular_src_make x-modular.eclass, line 325: Called die !!! emake failed !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. There are also error messages from the compiler? Any ideas what to do? If so, please consider me a gentoo-dummie. At the moment I do not have installed any x11-base/xorg-x11. My old version (6.9) blocked my system update (emerge -avuD system). That's why I thoght it might be a good idea to deinstall it, update the system and then reinstall the new version. Maybe it wasn't such a good idea... Updating xorg is seldom a good idea if you need a working system. ;) Regards Sebastian Noack -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] writable devices being mounted as read only
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 13:43, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 00:57 schrieb ext Hemmann, Volker Armin: On Monday 07 August 2006 21:49, sean wrote: Hello All, Whenever I mount my USB DVD writer or my SCSI cd-rom writer I always get the following similar message for either device, root or otherwise. mount /mnt/dvd/ mount: block device /dev/sr1 is write-protected, mounting read-only This is just a hint for you. /dev/sr1 is a read-only device per definition. Both devices in my fstab have 'noauto,user,rw' but still the write only message. Try modprobe sg to get a writable device. HTH -Robin. -- -- Robin Atwood -- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] writable devices being mounted as read only
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 08:04, Graham Murray wrote: Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: well, if you mount a burnt blank, it has to be read only. Empty blanks can not be mounted. So everything seems to be ok. And if you want to write to a +rw blank, you don't mount them too. AFAIR of course. But you do mount a DVD-RAM. after fiddling around with pktdvdco ;) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] writable devices being mounted as read only
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 12:59 schrieb ext Robin Atwood: Try modprobe sg to get a writable device. Wrong. sg is a char device, you can't mount it. Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net pgpFr7HJQb896.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Error updateing ffmpeg
Hi all, I have been having this problem for a few days now I am ~x86, Portage 2.1.1_pre4-r4 (default-linux/x86/2006.0, gcc-4.1.1/vanilla, glibc-2.4-r3, 2.6.17-gentoo-r1 i686). Any ideas? Paul i386/snowdsp_mmx.c: In function 'ff_snow_vertical_compose97i_sse2': i386/snowdsp_mmx.c:461: error: PIC register '%ebx' clobbered in 'asm' i386/snowdsp_mmx.c: In function 'ff_snow_vertical_compose97i_mmx': i386/snowdsp_mmx.c:568: error: PIC register '%ebx' clobbered in 'asm' i386/snowdsp_mmx.c: In function 'inner_add_yblock_bw_8_obmc_16_mmx': i386/snowdsp_mmx.c:869: error: PIC register '%ebx' clobbered in 'asm' make[1]: *** [i386/snowdsp_mmx.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20060530/work/ffmpeg-0.4.9-p20060530-shared/libavcodec' make: *** [lib] Error 2 !!! ERROR: media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20060530 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1543: Called dyn_compile ebuild.sh, line 938: Called src_compile ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20060530.ebuild, line 187: Called die !!! shared failed -- This message has been sent using kmail with gentoo linux -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] k3b no devices
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 13:52 schrieb ext Oliver Klein: i had installed k3b but when i started this as a user, there was no device in k3b. HereŽs my config... Is the user member of group cdrw? Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net pgpu7dQJiVnDV.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: [***SPAM***] - Re: [gentoo-user] k3b no devices - Email found in subject
Hi Dirk yes he´s in the group cdrw. Mit freundlichem Gruss/Best regards Comdivision Support Team Oliver Klein Comdivision GmbH Friedrich-Ebert-Str. 74 D-48153 Muenster Deutschland / Germany I: http://www.comdivision.com T: +49 251 68662 0 F: +49 251 68662 10 Premium Support : +49 900 1 26634847 7x24h Support (1,50 Euro/Minute) -Original Message- From: Dirk Heinrichs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:03 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [***SPAM***] - Re: [gentoo-user] k3b no devices - Email found in subject Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 13:52 schrieb ext Oliver Klein: i had installed k3b but when i started this as a user, there was no device in k3b. HereŽs my config... Is the user member of group cdrw? Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] k3b no devices
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 13:52 schrieb ext Oliver Klein: and i added my user to the group cdrw. So what´s wrong with this config or what I had forget? Sorry, didn't see this before. Anyway, did you do logout and login after adding the user to that group? Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net pgpndfQ4J9cmg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Error updateing ffmpeg
Paul Stear wrote: i386/snowdsp_mmx.c: In function 'ff_snow_vertical_compose97i_sse2': i386/snowdsp_mmx.c:461: error: PIC register '%ebx' clobbered in 'asm' i386/snowdsp_mmx.c: In function 'ff_snow_vertical_compose97i_mmx': i386/snowdsp_mmx.c:568: error: PIC register '%ebx' clobbered in 'asm' i386/snowdsp_mmx.c: In function 'inner_add_yblock_bw_8_obmc_16_mmx': i386/snowdsp_mmx.c:869: error: PIC register '%ebx' clobbered in 'asm' It's been reported many times in bugzilla: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142380 Benno -- Cetere mi opinias ke ne ĉio tradukenda estas. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
RE: [***SPAM***] - Re: [gentoo-user] k3b no devices - Email found in subject
No this i didn´t do, i will test this when i´m @home...thx Mit freundlichem Gruss/Best regards Comdivision Support Team Oliver Klein Comdivision GmbH Friedrich-Ebert-Str. 74 D-48153 Muenster Deutschland / Germany I: http://www.comdivision.com T: +49 251 68662 0 F: +49 251 68662 10 Premium Support : +49 900 1 26634847 7x24h Support (1,50 Euro/Minute) -Original Message- From: Dirk Heinrichs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:24 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [***SPAM***] - Re: [gentoo-user] k3b no devices - Email found in subject Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 13:52 schrieb ext Oliver Klein: and i added my user to the group cdrw. So what´s wrong with this config or what I had forget? Sorry, didn't see this before. Anyway, did you do logout and login after adding the user to that group? Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [***SPAM***] - Re: [gentoo-user] k3b no devices - Email found in subject
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:46 schrieb ext Oliver Klein: No this i didn´t do, i will test this when i´m @home...thx OK. And could you please... 1) ... fix your spam filter. 2) ... read http://learn.to/quote Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net pgpXzJ2zLUoKG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] thinkorswim stock trading platform
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:21:00PM -0700, Penguin Lover Mark Knecht squawked: OK, but grep doesn't say anything either since that's the only line. For instance: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Desktop $ cat TOS.txt | grep libc.so.6 open(/lib/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY)= 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Desktop $ cat TOS.txt | grep libdl.so.2 open(/lib/libdl.so.2, O_RDONLY) = 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Desktop $ While I'm not an expert either, I think those lines at least mean that the installer found your libraries. (open returned a file handler, instead of -1.) So perhaps it is not the path that is causing your troubles. Best, W -- Steve:Face it, you're no match for a human opponent. Pintsize: That's because I don't have thumbs. Sortir en Pantoufles: up 12 days, 16:22 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ERROR: x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7 failed.
2006/8/8, Noack, Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have some trouble with emerging x11-base/xorg-x11. I tried to run emerge -avD x11-base/xorg-x11 -D affects only something if you pass also -u. I get the same when I call emerge -auD x11-base/xorg-x11, which was what I intended. !!! ERROR: x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1539: Called dyn_compile ebuild.sh, line 939: Called src_compile ebuild.sh, line 1248: Called x-modular_src_compile x-modular.eclass, line 330: Called x-modular_src_make x-modular.eclass, line 325: Called die !!! emake failed !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. There are also error messages from the compiler? Here everythin from the first compiler error: glxcmds.c: In function `__glXBindSwapBarrierSGIX': glxcmds.c:1749: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size glxcmds.c: In function `__glxQueryHyperpipeNetworkSGIX': glxcmds.c:1796: error: `xGLXQueryHyperpipeNetworkSGIXReq' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1796: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once glxcmds.c:1796: error: for each function it appears in.) glxcmds.c:1796: error: `req' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1796: error: syntax error before ')' token glxcmds.c:1797: error: `xGLXQueryHyperpipeNetworkSGIXReply' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1812: error: `reply' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1825: error: `sz_xGLXQueryHyperpipeNetworkSGIXReply' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c: In function `__glxDestroyHyperpipeConfigSGIX': glxcmds.c:1836: error: `xGLXDestroyHyperpipeConfigSGIXReq' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1836: error: `req' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1837: error: syntax error before ')' token glxcmds.c:1838: error: `xGLXDestroyHyperpipeConfigSGIXReply' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1851: error: `reply' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1863: error: `sz_xGLXDestroyHyperpipeConfigSGIXReply' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c: In function `__glxQueryHyperpipeConfigSGIX': glxcmds.c:1871: error: `xGLXQueryHyperpipeConfigSGIXReq' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1871: error: `req' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1872: error: syntax error before ')' token glxcmds.c:1873: error: `xGLXQueryHyperpipeConfigSGIXReply' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1889: error: `reply' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1904: error: `sz_xGLXQueryHyperpipeConfigSGIXReply' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c: In function `__glxHyperpipeConfigSGIX': glxcmds.c:1915: error: `xGLXHyperpipeConfigSGIXReq' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1915: error: `req' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1916: error: syntax error before ')' token glxcmds.c:1917: error: `xGLXHyperpipeConfigSGIXReply' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1935: error: `reply' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1949: error: `sz_xGLXHyperpipeConfigSGIXReply' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [glxcmds.lo] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -I../../include -I../../include -I../../include -I../../include -I../../GL/include -I../../hw/xfree86/os-support -DHAVE_DIX_CONFIG_H -I/var/tmp/portage/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7/work/Mesa-6.4.2/include -DXFree86Server -DIN_MODULE -DXFree86Module -DXFree86LOADER -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE -DHAS_FCHOWN -DHAS_STICKY_DIR_BIT -I../../include -I../../include -I../../Xext -I../../composite -I../../damageext -I../../xfixes -I../../Xi -I../../mi -I../../miext/shadow -I../../miext/damage -I../../render -I../../randr -I../../fb -I../../lbx -march=k8 -O2 -pipe -MT glxcmdsswap.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/glxcmdsswap.Tpo -c glxcmdsswap.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/glxcmdsswap.o make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7/work/xorg-server-1.0.2/GL/glx' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7/work/xorg-server-1.0.2/GL' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 !!! ERROR: x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1539: Called dyn_compile ebuild.sh, line 939: Called src_compile ebuild.sh, line 1248: Called x-modular_src_compile x-modular.eclass, line 330: Called x-modular_src_make x-modular.eclass, line 325: Called die !!! emake failed !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. Any ideas what to do? If so, please consider me a gentoo-dummie. At the moment I do not have installed any x11-base/xorg-x11. My old version (6.9) blocked my
[gentoo-user] DSPAM?
What experiences have users had with using the DSPAM ebuild? I notice that all versions of the ebuild are marked as ~x86, so I thought I would followup. Thanks, Tom Veldhouse -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Disk quota and LDAP
OK. :-( 2006/8/8, Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 08:14 schrieb ext Leandro Melo de Sales: For management issues! :) You can't manage quota with LDAP. Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net -- Leandro Melo de Sales. Computer Science MSc Candidate Distributed System Lab - lsd.ufcg.edu.br Pervasive Computing Lab - embedded.ufcg.edu.br Universidade Federal de Campina Grande - UFCG -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Error updateing ffmpeg
Paul Stear wrote: Hi all, I have been having this problem for a few days now I am ~x86, Portage 2.1.1_pre4-r4 (default-linux/x86/2006.0, gcc-4.1.1/vanilla, glibc-2.4-r3, 2.6.17-gentoo-r1 i686). Any ideas? Paul i386/snowdsp_mmx.c: In function 'ff_snow_vertical_compose97i_sse2': i386/snowdsp_mmx.c:461: error: PIC register '%ebx' clobbered in 'asm' i386/snowdsp_mmx.c: In function 'ff_snow_vertical_compose97i_mmx': i386/snowdsp_mmx.c:568: error: PIC register '%ebx' clobbered in 'asm' i386/snowdsp_mmx.c: In function 'inner_add_yblock_bw_8_obmc_16_mmx': i386/snowdsp_mmx.c:869: error: PIC register '%ebx' clobbered in 'asm' make[1]: *** [i386/snowdsp_mmx.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20060530/work/ffmpeg-0.4.9-p20060530-shared/libavcodec' make: *** [lib] Error 2 !!! ERROR: media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20060530 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1543: Called dyn_compile ebuild.sh, line 938: Called src_compile ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20060530.ebuild, line 187: Called die !!! shared failed The workaround for this is USE=-mmx then ffmpeg should build but its a workaround to a bug not a full solution. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] DSPAM?
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:04:44 -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: What experiences have users had with using the DSPAM ebuild? I notice that all versions of the ebuild are marked as ~x86, so I thought I would followup. I've been using it for a while, nearly two years from the ebuild, compiled manually before that. It's always worked well. In which case, do you have any idea why it is labeled ~x86? Thanks, Tom -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ?
Hi, Soon I will change me system from PATA (80GB) to SATA (200GB). I am playing with installing LVM for all parts of the filesystem with the execption of the / -filesystem. May be I will convert this later, too, but one step after the other... But I have no idea about the Pros and Contras of using LVM instead of the classical fixed size partition scheme. Can someone point me to a text or something which explains this aspect of LVM ? I tried google but there far too many Pro and Contra texts about other things. Thanks a lot in advance for any help in advance! mcc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Error updateing ffmpeg
Paul Stear wrote: Thanks, I have just tried that but I still get the same error. I have looked at the bug, it seems that something needs patching, but I got confused (not that hard these days). I suppose I'll have to wait until the next version with a fix is released. Paul ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20060302 still builds cleanly. IIRC there isn't much difference between the two though 0302 will occasionally bomb out on weird .wav files. kashani -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ?
Meino Christian Cramer wrote: Hi, Soon I will change me system from PATA (80GB) to SATA (200GB). I am playing with installing LVM for all parts of the filesystem with the execption of the / -filesystem. May be I will convert this later, too, but one step after the other... But I have no idea about the Pros and Contras of using LVM instead of the classical fixed size partition scheme. Can someone point me to a text or something which explains this aspect of LVM ? I tried google but there far too many Pro and Contra texts about other things. Thanks a lot in advance for any help in advance! mcc On a home system I'd be tempted to have one big partition where LVM would buy you nothing. Pros: However at work I run a number of dev boxes. You can tell a programmer many things, but you can't tell him where to put his files. Using LVM I allocated 40GB of an 80GB drive and now can grow /var /tmp /opt and /home as needed. I run the whole thing on top of a software RAID 1. Cons: I briefly blew up LVM by not rebuilding lvm after device-mapper changed... or it might have been the other way around. Had to chroot, figure out how to mount LVM, and then rebuild a few packages. Took maybe 60 minutes or so since I had to manually setup the RAID 1 first. I guess the con is more stuff to remember to build into your kernel and watch for updates on. kashani -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ?
From: kashani [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ? Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:51:58 -0700 Meino Christian Cramer wrote: Hi, Soon I will change me system from PATA (80GB) to SATA (200GB). I am playing with installing LVM for all parts of the filesystem with the execption of the / -filesystem. May be I will convert this later, too, but one step after the other... But I have no idea about the Pros and Contras of using LVM instead of the classical fixed size partition scheme. Can someone point me to a text or something which explains this aspect of LVM ? I tried google but there far too many Pro and Contra texts about other things. Thanks a lot in advance for any help in advance! mcc On a home system I'd be tempted to have one big partition where LVM would buy you nothing. Pros: However at work I run a number of dev boxes. You can tell a programmer many things, but you can't tell him where to put his files. Using LVM I allocated 40GB of an 80GB drive and now can grow /var /tmp /opt and /home as needed. I run the whole thing on top of a software RAID 1. Cons: I briefly blew up LVM by not rebuilding lvm after device-mapper changed... or it might have been the other way around. Had to chroot, figure out how to mount LVM, and then rebuild a few packages. Took maybe 60 minutes or so since I had to manually setup the RAID 1 first. I guess the con is more stuff to remember to build into your kernel and watch for updates on. kashani -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list Thanks a lot for your reply, kashani ! :) Hrrrmmm...I am not a native English speaker...I am not whether I understood your first sentence correctly... Did you mean: On a home system it is no advantage to use LVM or did you mean: On a home system there is no disadvantage when using LVM (or did you mean something totally different ???) I will use LVM strictly home... And yes: You can tell a programmer many things, but you can't tell him where to put his files. TRUE! I am a programmer (but the system with or without LVM I have in mind is not for my profession but for my hobby...) and know that your are right :) X-} What's about fragmentation of data, when using LVM ? Keep hacking! mcc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ERROR: x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r7 failed.
On 8/8/06, Julia Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here everythin from the first compiler error: glxcmds.c: In function `__glXBindSwapBarrierSGIX': glxcmds.c:1749: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size glxcmds.c: In function `__glxQueryHyperpipeNetworkSGIX': glxcmds.c:1796: error: `xGLXQueryHyperpipeNetworkSGIXReq' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1796: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once glxcmds.c:1796: error: for each function it appears in.) glxcmds.c:1796: error: `req' undeclared (first use in this function) glxcmds.c:1796: error: syntax error before ')' token Hmm, are you using proprietary drivers and their implementation of opengl? If so, try doing an eselect opengl set xorg-x11, merge xorg-x11, then eselect opengl back to whatever you want. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ?
On 8/8/06, Meino Christian Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's about fragmentation of data, when using LVM ? There are very few disadvantages. If you put root on LVM, then you will require an initramfs to boot, and as kashani said, if the LVM packages break somehow, you will be back to a livecd. However, I think keeping a backup initramfs and kernel in /boot should be sufficient for most cases. The biggest advantage is that you can easily add more space to a volume group if you run out. So say you only allocate the 80G you are currently using to your logical volumes initially, you can add space to them as required from the unallocated space. LVM has no effect on fragmentation however, other than that you can easily use more and smaller filesystems to keep the effects of fragmentation managable. When you consider how the different areas of a gentoo directory tree are used, it makes sense to use different filesystems for /, /var, /usr/portage, and /home. I also recommend separate filesystems for /usr/portage/packages and distfiles, just to keep those large archives out of the same filesystem that contains the ebuilds. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ?
From: Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ? Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:59:02 -0700 On 8/8/06, Meino Christian Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's about fragmentation of data, when using LVM ? There are very few disadvantages. If you put root on LVM, then you will require an initramfs to boot, and as kashani said, if the LVM packages break somehow, you will be back to a livecd. However, I think keeping a backup initramfs and kernel in /boot should be sufficient for most cases. The biggest advantage is that you can easily add more space to a volume group if you run out. So say you only allocate the 80G you are currently using to your logical volumes initially, you can add space to them as required from the unallocated space. LVM has no effect on fragmentation however, other than that you can easily use more and smaller filesystems to keep the effects of fragmentation managable. When you consider how the different areas of a gentoo directory tree are used, it makes sense to use different filesystems for /, /var, /usr/portage, and /home. I also recommend separate filesystems for /usr/portage/packages and distfiles, just to keep those large archives out of the same filesystem that contains the ebuilds. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list Hi Richard ! Thanks a lot for your explanations! :) Yes, the variable size of a LVM was that feature what attracts my attention first. Another question came up in my mind: Is a logical volumes (that beast where I put the filesystem on finally) behaviour identical to that of an ordinary old fashioned partion? Is it possible (for example) to feed such an lv again through the device mapper for encryption purposes ? Is the performance impact via LVM (not encryption) noticeable or negliable? Keep hacking! mcc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] XEN on Gentoo, enough stable for production use ?
I have some problems with NFS on a domU. Having mounted my home partition on Dom0 from an nfs server on a domU I invoke an X-Session and get my e-mail from my server from another DomU with thunderbird. I get some 1000 mails a day. Sometimes suddenly all hangs and /var/log/messages tell me NFS server cannot be contacted. I can ping to the outside but I cannot ping each of my DomU's. My second xenified machine doesn't crash and runs several days now. but has neither an nfs server nor an X-server installed. I filed a bug today and do not mount my home partition from the nfs server anymore although every 2nd day a script connects to all my domains over ssh and does an emerge -update -deep world [+metadata] after --sync on the portage proxy over nfs, which is apparently the same nfs server my home partion came from. I will investigate that further and report if I still have problems. Greetings, Robert -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ?
LVM let's you add space to volumes without having to create new partitions, move the data over, and then do something with the old one. From: Meino Christian Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/08/08 Tue PM 12:27:53 EDT To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ? Hi, Soon I will change me system from PATA (80GB) to SATA (200GB). I am playing with installing LVM for all parts of the filesystem with the execption of the / -filesystem. May be I will convert this later, too, but one step after the other... But I have no idea about the Pros and Contras of using LVM instead of the classical fixed size partition scheme. Can someone point me to a text or something which explains this aspect of LVM ? I tried google but there far too many Pro and Contra texts about other things. Thanks a lot in advance for any help in advance! mcc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ?
Meino Christian Cramer schrieb: From: kashani [EMAIL PROTECTED] On a home system I'd be tempted to have one big partition where LVM would buy you nothing. Pros: However at work I run a number of dev boxes. You can tell a programmer many things, but you can't tell him where to put his files. Using LVM I allocated 40GB of an 80GB drive and now can grow /var /tmp /opt and /home as needed. I run the whole thing on top of a software RAID 1. Cons: I briefly blew up LVM by not rebuilding lvm after device-mapper changed... or it might have been the other way around. Had to chroot, figure out how to mount LVM, and then rebuild a few packages. Took maybe 60 minutes or so since I had to manually setup the RAID 1 first. I guess the con is more stuff to remember to build into your kernel and watch for updates on. kashani -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list Thanks a lot for your reply, kashani ! :) Hrrrmmm...I am not a native English speaker...I am not whether I understood your first sentence correctly... Did you mean: On a home system it is no advantage to use LVM Yes, because he'd give the (IMO *extremely* *bad*) advice to use just one huge filesystem for everything. I very much disagree with that. IMO, even on home systems it makes a lot of sense to use multiple file systems. What's about fragmentation of data, when using LVM ? It doesn't have anything to do with LVM. You're mentioning a problem of LVM: With LVM, the Logical Volumes, and thus the filesystems on top of those LVs can be fragmented (and very often will be). This happens, when a LV will be resized. Reason: Suppose two LVs are created. Those 2 LVs are adjacent. Then the 1st LV (at the beginning of the VG) is to be extended (made bigger). This will cause the first part of the 1st LV to be in front of the 2nd LV and the 2nd part of the 1st LV will be after the 2nd LV. Alexander Skwar -- Never commit yourself! Let someone else commit you. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ?
Meino Christian Cramer schrieb: Another question came up in my mind: Is a logical volumes (that beast where I put the filesystem on finally) behaviour identical to that of an ordinary old fashioned partion? In how far? Is it possible (for example) to feed such an lv again through the device mapper for encryption purposes ? Yes. Is the performance impact via LVM (not encryption) noticeable or negliable? I don't know of any benchmarks. Guts feeling: Not noticeable. Alexander Skwar -- Half a mind is a terrible thing to waste! -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Gnome Session not saving
Despite having Ask on Logout ticked in the Gnome Sessions Preference I'm not being prompted to Save Session when I log out. As a result none of my desktop changes are persistent over different logons. Any idea what could be happening? -- Alex, homepage: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/ The way to a man's heart is through the left ventricle. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update --deep world installs unwanted packages
Andrew Syrewicze wrote: I ran that command and they showed up in the list, among other things. How would I go about fixing that??? If you installed gnome, they both will get pulled in as they're an official part of gnome as distributed by upstream. You may look into package.provided (see the portage man page) to provide a fake version if you really don't want them installed, but you're responsible for anything that depends on them and breaks. Thanks, Donnie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update --deep world installs unwanted packages
Nick Rout wrote: On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:52:45 + Andrew Syrewicze wrote: Daniel da Veiga wrote: On 8/8/06, Andrew Syrewicze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey eveyone. This is probably a really simple question. I've used debian for many years and recnetly made a permanent switch to gentoo, so i'm a bit noobish when it comes to portage. I had pretty much all the programs I want installed on my machine so i figured I should run an update to keep everything current, so i ran "emerge --update --deep world". This reinstalled two packages that I had recently removed like epiphany, and evolution. When I removed these prior to the update I followed the portage documentation on removing them, and ran the proper sequence of commands. so, my question is. How can I stop portage from reinstallin g these packages everytime I run an update??? They're probably dependencies from another package. Try emerge -uDpvt world That is a short for "--update --depp --pretend --verbose --tree". I ran that command and they showed up in the list, among other things. How would I go about fixing that??? -ando Often evolution gets included because some other package has the eds (evolution data server) USE flag turned on. Try USE=-eds emerge -uDpvt world and see if they are included. (PS don't use USE= on the command line for anything other than --pretend (-p), if you want to change a USE flag either do it globally in /etc/make.conf or per package in /etc/portage/package.use also in tree view you can often who is depending on whom, they are in dependency order (and reverse of the order you get without --tree (-t) Yeah it allows me to see the denpends much better. Would I be able to mask those two packages manually or would that cause breakage?? -ando
Re: [gentoo-user] DSPAM?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: In which case, do you have any idea why it is labeled ~x86? Thanks, Tom It is still labeled ~x86, just like all other testing packages, because there are open bugs within the last 30 days. http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDfield0-0-0=producttype0-0-0=substringvalue0-0-0=dspamfield0-0-1=componenttype0-0-1=substringvalue0-0-1=dspamfield0-0-2=short_desctype0-0-2=substringvalue0-0-2=dspamfield0-0-3=status_whiteboardtype0-0-3=substringvalue0-0-3=dspam (really long URL) - -- Jeremy Olexa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE2R6zFN7pD9kMi/URAjUkAJwOQMuOb/y9/mrHNP/HACY2N4D7HACdHl85 m+Xs8b9HLu6uGsgY7kE9ufU= =CMdP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] espxe masked by missing keyword
I've been trying to emerge epsxe but it is masked by a missing keyword? how do i go about unmasking this package??? I'm new to gentoo and portage. thanks all -ando -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] OT - Best IRC client
So I'm wondering what the consensus is regarding what is the best irc client under Gentoo. Tony -- Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Best IRC client
a lot of developers use irssi. On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:09:50 -0500 Anthony E. Caudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I'm wondering what the consensus is regarding what is the best irc client under Gentoo. Tony -- Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list pgpJo4oGagwws.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Best IRC client
Anthony E. Caudel wrote: So I'm wondering what the consensus is regarding what is the best irc client under Gentoo. A lot of people use xchat for GUI, it's gtk2-based. KDE has a couple of pretty good ones, too. If you want always-on IRC, the usual answer is to run irssi in a screen session on some server. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Best IRC client
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:31:02PM -0400, Mike wrote: I have tried most of them and I prefer Xchat for a gtk app and IRSSI for the terminal but I am using Gaim right now for IRC because i like having all my text messaging in the same program. With centericq, irssi, and mutt I can run chat, irc, and mail clients in an always-on manner as three terminals within a single screen session. Justin -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Best IRC client
Justin R Findlay wrote: On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:31:02PM -0400, Mike wrote: I have tried most of them and I prefer Xchat for a gtk app and IRSSI for the terminal but I am using Gaim right now for IRC because i like having all my text messaging in the same program. With centericq, irssi, and mutt I can run chat, irc, and mail clients in an always-on manner as three terminals within a single screen session. Justin Amen to that, centericq is really cool and you can irc and rss with it too but most of the time I want some eye candy that only X can provide. Mike -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Mount and write ntfs (natively)
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 06:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing stuff on line that indicates it is now possible to write to ntfs formated disk from linux (at least semi-reliably). I'd like to delete a few directories and files that the windows xp OS sees as `system files' and will not allow them to be deleted. (...) Can anyone guide me on this? AFAIK because it's semi-reliable most (every?) distribution does not activate write acces on NTFS. I do also have a Windows installation for Video Processing. I went another way and purchased xplite (www.litepc.com) that gives you access to many more control than just deleting system files. Note that I imagine that most things could be managed if we knew what to change where in the registry, but I don't want to digg into that. Thierry -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Mount and write ntfs (natively)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I'm seeing stuff on line that indicates it is now possible to write to ntfs formated disk from linux Yes. It's called ntfs3g. There's an ebuild for it. Alexander Skwar -- Gold's Law: If the shoe fits, it's ugly. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
