Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox fails to compile. crc32 error??
Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > Looks like it is related to -march=native. > > See bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/838373 > Nailed it. After the post by Michael, I edited the kernel several times. I'm sure I ruled that thing out. I had some crc stuff not there but same error with or without. I admit, I wouldn't have thought of a kernel driver issue but the error did sort of lead that way. Given the CPU FLAGS is about the CPU and its instruction set, it could be a option. I would never have thought of the CFLAGS in make.conf. I'm not sure how you figured that out either. o_O Before trying new settings for that, I tried newer versions of clang, llvm and their friends to see if there was a fix that wasn't applied to older versions. When you unmask one thing, it snowballs a bit. Anyway, after getting a more recent version of clang and llvm, it still failed. At that point, I suspected that I had ruled out those packages. I did some digging to find what my CFLAG settings should be if done manually. It took some digging tho. Once I set that to the manual way, it compiled successfully on the first try. So, my backup rig now has a web browser. That's good. ;-) I wonder why that bug report wasn't in the search results when I was digging for the error??? If I see something Gentoo related, I always look. While at it. I don't think there is a way but I may have missed it. As a example, when I wanted to unmask/keyword specific versions of llvm and clang, is there a tool to find out what all else has to also be unmasked/keyworded? When I tried to do that for the packages I wanted, I ended up running emerge to find more that had to be added to the list. This is the list I ended up with. sys-devel/clang sys-devel/llvm sys-devel/clang-common sys-devel/clang-runtime sys-devel/clang-toolchain-symlinks sys-libs/compiler-rt sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers sys-libs/libomp sys-devel/llvm-toolchain-symlinks sys-devel/llvmgold It would be nice if there is a way to just run a command once and it spits out a friendly list that can be added to the proper file. Save annoying some electrons and all. ;-) Thanks much to you both. I hope if someone else runs into this, this thread pops up in the search results. Save someone some head scratching. Dale :-) :-) P. S. Switched computer case door to left side hinge the other day. Put in the drive trays and figuring out if there is a way to put drives in other places and still have lots of fans. :-D
Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox fails to compile. crc32 error??
On Thursday, 23 November 2023 11:06:25 GMT Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > Am 23. November 2023 08:08:47 UTC schrieb Dale : > >Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > >> Looks like it is related to -march=native. > >> > >> See bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/838373 > > > >I'm not sure how you figured that out either. > > > > I pasted the error message into the search engine of my choice. I think > there were some results from the Gentoo forums which lead to the bug > report. Good catch. I suspected it could have been caused by a kernel module enabling CRC in hardware missing, but I didn't think of a bug being the cause of it, let alone caused by march=native. It compiles and installs fine here with march=native. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox fails to compile. crc32 error??
Am 23. November 2023 08:08:47 UTC schrieb Dale : >Daniel Pielmeier wrote: >> Looks like it is related to -march=native. >> >> See bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/838373 >> > >I'm not sure how you figured that out either. I pasted the error message into the search engine of my choice. I think there were some results from the Gentoo forums which lead to the bug report. -- Best regards Daniel
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 04:07, Jack wrote: > > May or may not help, but have you tried revdep-rebuild? Also, you can try just one-shotting the reported packages, such as (for the last one in your list): emerge -1 sys-libs/zlib Regards, Arve
[gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
First time I've seen this happen! Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the following preserved libs: --- !!! existing preserved libs: >>> package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4 * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1 * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0.8 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) >>> package: dev-libs/glib-2.76.4 * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4 * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved) >>> package: dev-libs/libpcre2-10.42-r1 * - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0 * - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0.11.2 * used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4 (preserved) >>> package: media-gfx/graphite2-1.3.14_p20210810-r3 * - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3 * - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3.2.1 * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved) >>> package: media-libs/freetype-2.13.2 * - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 * - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved) >>> package: media-libs/harfbuzz-8.2.0 * - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 * - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) >>> package: media-libs/libpng-1.6.40-r1 * - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16 * - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) >>> package: sys-libs/zlib-1.3-r1 * - /usr/lib/libz.so.1 * - /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.13 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0 (preserved) --- But when I run emerge @preserved-rebuild as one should, all I get is: "Nothing to merge; quitting." Anyone else experienced this? How do I figure out what I need to do? Thanks in advance.
[gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
First time I've seen this happen! Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the following preserved libs: --- !!! existing preserved libs: >>> package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4 * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1 * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0.8 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) >>> package: dev-libs/glib-2.76.4 * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4 * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved) >>> package: dev-libs/libpcre2-10.42-r1 * - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0 * - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0.11.2 * used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4 (preserved) >>> package: media-gfx/graphite2-1.3.14_p20210810-r3 * - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3 * - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3.2.1 * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved) >>> package: media-libs/freetype-2.13.2 * - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 * - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved) >>> package: media-libs/harfbuzz-8.2.0 * - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 * - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) >>> package: media-libs/libpng-1.6.40-r1 * - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16 * - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) >>> package: sys-libs/zlib-1.3-r1 * - /usr/lib/libz.so.1 * - /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.13 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0 (preserved) --- But when I run emerge @preserved-rebuild as one should, all I get is: "Nothing to merge; quitting." Anyone else experienced this? How do I figure out what I need to do? Thanks in advance.
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
May or may not help, but have you tried revdep-rebuild? On 11/23/23 16:51, Matt Connell wrote: First time I've seen this happen! Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the following preserved libs: --- !!! existing preserved libs: package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4 * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1 * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0.8 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) package: dev-libs/glib-2.76.4 * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4 * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved) package: dev-libs/libpcre2-10.42-r1 * - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0 * - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0.11.2 * used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4 (preserved) package: media-gfx/graphite2-1.3.14_p20210810-r3 * - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3 * - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3.2.1 * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved) package: media-libs/freetype-2.13.2 * - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 * - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved) package: media-libs/harfbuzz-8.2.0 * - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 * - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) package: media-libs/libpng-1.6.40-r1 * - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16 * - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) package: sys-libs/zlib-1.3-r1 * - /usr/lib/libz.so.1 * - /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.13 * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16 (preserved) * used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0 (preserved) --- But when I run emerge @preserved-rebuild as one should, all I get is: "Nothing to merge; quitting." Anyone else experienced this? How do I figure out what I need to do? Thanks in advance.
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
Sorry for the double post; I got a mail-undeliverable from Google so I thought it didn't go through and retried it. Turns out it got to the mailing list (both times) but not to gmail recipients because Google doesn't like my SPF record (record says hard-fail on no match and someone somewhere is using ipv6).
Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox fails to compile. crc32 error??
Michael wrote: > On Thursday, 23 November 2023 11:06:25 GMT Daniel Pielmeier wrote: >> Am 23. November 2023 08:08:47 UTC schrieb Dale : >>> Daniel Pielmeier wrote: Looks like it is related to -march=native. See bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/838373 >>> I'm not sure how you figured that out either. >> >> >> I pasted the error message into the search engine of my choice. I think >> there were some results from the Gentoo forums which lead to the bug >> report. > Good catch. I suspected it could have been caused by a kernel module > enabling > CRC in hardware missing, but I didn't think of a bug being the cause of it, > let alone caused by march=native. It compiles and installs fine here with > march=native. I think it only gets hit with this with certain CPUs. Mine just happens to be one of them for the 770T. My main rig, which only has a slightly newer CPU, is not hit by this. I'm just surprised that it is still not fixed somehow. It sounds like upstream tho not Gentoo. Us Gentoo folks just happen to be hit by it since we compile our own packages. I'm just glad to get it installed. At least if something happens to this main rig, I got something to use. It's gonna be slow tho. Half the CPU cores, half the memory. Beats nothing tho. At least I can still watch TV. O_O Thanks to all. :-D Dale :-) :-)
