Re: [geo] Physics Today article

2014-03-04 Thread Mike MacCracken
And then there is Holdren¹s rebuttal of Christy. See
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/03/03/3349411/john-holdren-roger-pielk
e-climate-drought/

Mike


On 3/4/14 4:15 PM, David Appell david.app...@gmail.com wrote:


 Bart Verheggen makes a pretty good case that the Christy  Spencer graph of
 model vs observed results is misleading, for two reasons: it uses only 5-year
 running averages, and because of the way it re-baselines:
  
 http://ourchangingclimate.wordpress.com/2014/02/22/john-christy-richard-mcnide
 r-roy-spencer-flat-earth-hot-spot-figure-baseline/
  
  Their graph badly needs to be peer reviewed, as do other statements Christy
 has made in public -- such as pushing an Anthony Watts paper in Congress the
 day after it appeared on the Web, purporting to find problems in the US
 surface station records. Problems with it were immediately pointed on the Web,
 and the Watts et al paper still hasn't appeared in a journal about 1.7 years
 later.
  
  David
  -- 
  David Appell, independent science writer
  e: david.app...@gmail.com
  w: http://www.davidappell.com
  
  
  On 3/4/2014 9:56 AM, euggor...@comcast.net wrote:
  
  
   
  
 
 
  Would anyone like to comment on this? It certainly deserves comment since
 right or wrong it appears in an authoritative journal.
  
 
  
  
 
 http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.
 8034?dm_i=1Y69,27QSN,E1MP2T,80LVA,1
  
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 geoengineering group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
  
  
 
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
geoengineering group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [geo] Physics Today article

2014-03-04 Thread Mike MacCracken
OOPS‹wrong skeptic. But article is god in any case.

Mike

And then there is Holdren¹s rebuttal of Christy. See
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/03/03/3349411/john-holdren-roger-pielk
e-climate-drought/

Mike


On 3/4/14 4:15 PM, David Appell david.app...@gmail.com wrote:


 Bart Verheggen makes a pretty good case that the Christy  Spencer graph of
 model vs observed results is misleading, for two reasons: it uses only 5-year
 running averages, and because of the way it re-baselines:
  
 http://ourchangingclimate.wordpress.com/2014/02/22/john-christy-richard-mcnide
 r-roy-spencer-flat-earth-hot-spot-figure-baseline/
  
  Their graph badly needs to be peer reviewed, as do other statements Christy
 has made in public -- such as pushing an Anthony Watts paper in Congress the
 day after it appeared on the Web, purporting to find problems in the US
 surface station records. Problems with it were immediately pointed on the Web,
 and the Watts et al paper still hasn't appeared in a journal about 1.7 years
 later.
  
  David
  -- 
  David Appell, independent science writer
  e: david.app...@gmail.com
  w: http://www.davidappell.com
  
  
  On 3/4/2014 9:56 AM, euggor...@comcast.net wrote:
  
  
   
  
 
 
  Would anyone like to comment on this? It certainly deserves comment since
 right or wrong it appears in an authoritative journal.
  
 
  
  
 
 http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.
 8034?dm_i=1Y69,27QSN,E1MP2T,80LVA,1
  
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 geoengineering group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
  
  
 
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
geoengineering group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.