[geo] Still More CDR: Nutty idea?

2013-08-24 Thread Rau, Greg
All the other techniques we know about just prevent emission, nothing else, 
said lead author Klaus Becker of the University of Hohenheim in Stuttgart, 
Germany. Only plants are able to extract carbon dioxide from the air.

Spoken like a true biologist. The problem with plants (unlike geochemical CO2 
uptake) is they usually don't store carbon long term. Solve that little problem 
(CROPS, biochar, etc.) plus nutrient, water, albedo, and land use issues  and 
maybe you've got something?  - Greg



CARBON CAPTURE:
Study proposes large 'carbon farms' to reverse rising temperatures

Elizabeth Harball, EE reporter

Published: Friday, August 23, 2013

A recent study by German researchers presents the possibility of carbon 
farming as a less risky alternative to other carbon capture and storage 
technologies. It suggests that a significant percentage of atmospheric CO2 
could potentially be removed by planting millions of acres of a hardy little 
shrub known as Jatropha curcas, or the Barbados nut, in dry, coastal areas.

But other experts raised doubts about the study's ambitious projections, 
questioning whether the Barbados nut would be able to grow well in sandy desert 
soils and absorb the quantity of carbon their models predict.

The researchers behind the study say Barbados nut plantations could help to 
mitigate the local effects of global warming in desert areas, causing a 
decrease in average temperature and an increase in precipitation. If a large 
enough portion of the Earth were blanketed with carbon farms, they say, these 
local effects could become global, capturing between 17 and 25 metric tons of 
CO2 per hectare each year over a 20-year period.

All the other techniques we know about just prevent emission, nothing else, 
said lead author Klaus Becker of the University of Hohenheim in Stuttgart, 
Germany. Only plants are able to extract carbon dioxide from the air.

The studyhttp://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/4/237/2013/esd-4-237-2013.pdf, 
published in the journal Earth System Dynamics, states that if 730 million 
hectares of land -- an area about three-quarters the size of the United States 
-- were devoted to this method of carbon farming, the current trend of rising 
atmospheric CO2 levels could be halted.

Carbon farms would not compete with food production if they were concentrated 
in dry coastal areas, the researchers said. In their scenario, oceanside 
desalination plants, partially powered by biomass harvested from the 
plantations themselves, provide a low-emissions irrigation method.

Could huge plantations change weather patterns?

The study states that the Barbados nut is uniquely suited to growing in regions 
inhospitable to other crops. The plant, which produces a nonedible seed that 
can be used to create biodiesel, is comfortable growing at temperatures 
exceeding 100 degrees Fahrenheit. It can also withstand high levels of 
contamination in the soil, making wastewater another potential source for 
irrigation.

Additionally, the plant grows rapidly and develops pretty large roots below 
the soil, which is important for carbon binding, said co-author Volker 
Wulfmeyer, also of the University of Hohenheim. As part of their research, 
Wulfmeyer and Becker traveled to a Barbados nut plantation in Luxor, Egypt, to 
collect physical samples from the plants to estimate their carbon-storing 
potential.

There are about 1 billion hectares of desert land in coastal areas that could 
be used for Barbados nut plantations, the researchers estimate, located in 
countries such as Mexico, Namibia, Saudi Arabia and Oman. If the entirety of 
this land were used for carbon farming, the study found, atmospheric carbon 
dioxide could be reduced by 17.5 parts per million over two decades, or 16.6 
percent of the CO2 increase since the start of the Industrial Revolution.

But less ambitious projects may also have an impact. Using models, the 
researchers projected that 100-square-kilometer plantations in Oman and 
Mexico's Sonoran Desert could cause temperatures to fall by more than 1 degree 
Celsius. The model also saw a precipitation increase of 11 millimeters per year 
in Oman and 30 millimeters per year in the Sonoran.

Paradoxically, this is because plantations are darker than the surrounding 
desert, explained Wulfmeyer, retaining more heat during the daytime. As a 
result, a low-pressure system develops over the carbon farm, causing changes in 
wind patterns that allow clouds to develop and precipitation to increase.

Mitigating global warming on a more local scale should be a big incentive for 
countries to back large plantations, Wulfmeyer said: The technology is there 
to do this, but it needs some enthusiasm and some idealism and some more 
knowledge in the countries before it can be realized.

Barbados nut a disappointment in the past

The cost of carbon farming is comparable to the costs associated with other 
carbon capture and storage technologies, the study asserts.

The researchers 

Re: [geo] Still More CDR: Nutty idea?

2013-08-24 Thread Ronal W. Larson
Greg and List:

   1.   Thanks for the alert on this (free) study, that can be found at  
   http://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/4/237/2013/esd-4-237-2013.pdf

   2.   Those (like myself) interested in your CROPS, biochar, etc,  will 
find plenty here on CDR, even though that term is here replaced by 
mitigation.  This is not the right term for  this list as there is no mention 
of replacing fossil fuels - only a relatively new form of afforestation, which 
they (accurately) report can take advantage of a considerable (gigahectare) 
supply of low value land - removing the most common complaint against biochar.

   3.   Unfortunately, the authors apparently are unaware that their scheme 
(afforestation using one species [jatropha] in arid coastal areas using 
desalinated water) might be more economically attractive if they also produced 
energy and improved soils (as with biochar), with years (centuries or 
millennia?) of out year soil improvement (including especially improved NPP) 
values.  Only doing CDR is a pretty narrow view of the potential of their basic 
scheme.   They noted that jatropha was a handy species for them, and maybe not 
the best species.  I would have liked to read about mangroves, which presumably 
would not require desalination - their main cost element.

   3.   Speaking of economics, the short summary (below) by the EE reporter 
said:
 The researchers calculated that the total cost for a plantation would be 
 between €42 and €63 per ton of carbon, or between about $55 and $85
 

 The article itself said clearly (unfortunately) that these price ranges 
were per ton of carbon dioxide, so for carbon need to be multiplied by 3.67.   
I sometimes see biochar numbers (for carbon, not carbon dioxide) in the stated 
range (and lower) - because the energy and soil improvement monetary flows with 
biochar, which are now available, could be added to the (presently not so 
available) afforestation/CDR funding.

Ron

   
On Aug 24, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Rau, Greg r...@llnl.gov wrote:

 All the other techniques we know about just prevent emission, nothing else, 
 said lead author Klaus Becker of the University of Hohenheim in Stuttgart, 
 Germany. Only plants are able to extract carbon dioxide from the air.
 
 Spoken like a true biologist. The problem with plants (unlike geochemical CO2 
 uptake) is they usually don't store carbon long term. Solve that little 
 problem (CROPS, biochar, etc.) plus nutrient, water, albedo, and land use 
 issues  and maybe you've got something?  - Greg
 
 
 
 CARBON CAPTURE:
 Study proposes large 'carbon farms' to reverse rising temperatures
 Elizabeth Harball, EE reporter
 Published: Friday, August 23, 2013
 A recent study by German researchers presents the possibility of carbon 
 farming as a less risky alternative to other carbon capture and storage 
 technologies. It suggests that a significant percentage of atmospheric CO2 
 could potentially be removed by planting millions of acres of a hardy little 
 shrub known as Jatropha curcas, or the Barbados nut, in dry, coastal areas.
 
 But other experts raised doubts about the study's ambitious projections, 
 questioning whether the Barbados nut would be able to grow well in sandy 
 desert soils and absorb the quantity of carbon their models predict.
 
 The researchers behind the study say Barbados nut plantations could help to 
 mitigate the local effects of global warming in desert areas, causing a 
 decrease in average temperature and an increase in precipitation. If a large 
 enough portion of the Earth were blanketed with carbon farms, they say, these 
 local effects could become global, capturing between 17 and 25 metric tons of 
 CO2 per hectare each year over a 20-year period.
 
 All the other techniques we know about just prevent emission, nothing else, 
 said lead author Klaus Becker of the University of Hohenheim in Stuttgart, 
 Germany. Only plants are able to extract carbon dioxide from the air.
 
 The study, published in the journal Earth System Dynamics, states that if 730 
 million hectares of land -- an area about three-quarters the size of the 
 United States -- were devoted to this method of carbon farming, the current 
 trend of rising atmospheric CO2 levels could be halted.
 
 Carbon farms would not compete with food production if they were concentrated 
 in dry coastal areas, the researchers said. In their scenario, oceanside 
 desalination plants, partially powered by biomass harvested from the 
 plantations themselves, provide a low-emissions irrigation method.
 
 Could huge plantations change weather patterns?
 
 The study states that the Barbados nut is uniquely suited to growing in 
 regions inhospitable to other crops. The plant, which produces a nonedible 
 seed that can be used to create biodiesel, is comfortable growing at 
 temperatures exceeding 100 degrees Fahrenheit. It can also withstand high 
 levels of contamination in the soil, making wastewater another potential 
 source