Re: [geos-devel] 3.3.3?
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 02:56:52PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: In order to have a 3.3.3 on the street to match up to PostGIS 2.0 I just dropped one out. It's the windows build issues plus the collections-with-empty fix you added. Good. Could you please also shift all 3.3.3 tickets up to 3.3.4 and announce the release ? --strk; ,--o-. | __/ |Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 ! | / 2.0 |http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com `-o--' ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
Re: [geos-devel] 3.3.3?
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 09:07:41AM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 02:56:52PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: In order to have a 3.3.3 on the street to match up to PostGIS 2.0 I just dropped one out. It's the windows build issues plus the collections-with-empty fix you added. Good. Could you please also shift all 3.3.3 tickets up to 3.3.4 and announce the release ? Never mind. I did this myself. It's pretty time consuming to do it one-by-one (only 10 of them, luckly). Do we have access to the underlying database to do it with an SQL line for next time ? --strk; ,--o-. | __/ |Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 ! | / 2.0 |http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com `-o--' ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
Re: [geos-devel] 3.3.3?
Such as minimum bounding circle for the C API? Though it looks like other C API changes are scheduled for 3.4. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:35:08AM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote: Any objection to my pushing out a 3.3.3? I see there are some small win32 fixes that I'm sure folks would enjoy not having to handfix building the tarball (having just hand-fixed them myself). Let's at least take a look at the 6 open tickets in that milestone for low hanging fruits ? After which, no problem with me with taking 3.3.3 out and planning a 3.3.4 --strk; ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel -- Sean Gillies ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
Re: [geos-devel] 3.3.3?
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:29:08AM -0700, Sean Gillies wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:35:08AM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote: Any objection to my pushing out a 3.3.3? I see there are some small win32 fixes that I'm sure folks would enjoy not having to handfix building the tarball (having just hand-fixed them myself). Let's at least take a look at the 6 open tickets in that milestone for low hanging fruits ? After which, no problem with me with taking 3.3.3 out and planning a 3.3.4 Such as minimum bounding circle for the C API? Though it looks like other C API changes are scheduled for 3.4. Yeah, that one is for 3.4. Feel free to rebase it. --strk; ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
Re: [geos-devel] 3.3.3?
None here, I think I put out a release with geos-trunk to get those fixes. Sooner the better :) -jeff -- Jeff McKenna MapServer Consulting and Training Services http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
Re: [geos-devel] 3.3.3?
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:35:08AM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote: Any objection to my pushing out a 3.3.3? I see there are some small win32 fixes that I'm sure folks would enjoy not having to handfix building the tarball (having just hand-fixed them myself). Let's at least take a look at the 6 open tickets in that milestone for low hanging fruits ? After which, no problem with me with taking 3.3.3 out and planning a 3.3.4 --strk; ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
