Re: [geos-devel] 3.3.3?
Such as minimum bounding circle for the C API? Though it looks like other C API changes are scheduled for 3.4. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:35:08AM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote: >> Any objection to my pushing out a 3.3.3? I see there are some small >> win32 fixes that I'm sure folks would enjoy not having to handfix >> building the tarball (having just hand-fixed them myself). > > Let's at least take a look at the 6 open tickets in that milestone > for low hanging fruits ? After which, no problem with me with taking > 3.3.3 out and planning a 3.3.4 > > --strk; > ___ > geos-devel mailing list > geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel -- Sean Gillies ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
Re: [geos-devel] 3.3.3?
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:29:08AM -0700, Sean Gillies wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:35:08AM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote: > >> Any objection to my pushing out a 3.3.3? I see there are some small > >> win32 fixes that I'm sure folks would enjoy not having to handfix > >> building the tarball (having just hand-fixed them myself). > > > > Let's at least take a look at the 6 open tickets in that milestone > > for low hanging fruits ? After which, no problem with me with taking > > 3.3.3 out and planning a 3.3.4 > > Such as minimum bounding circle for the C API? Though it looks like > other C API changes are scheduled for 3.4. Yeah, that one is for 3.4. Feel free to rebase it. --strk; ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel