Re: [Geoserver-users] Possible ways and costs for specific developments/improvements for GeoServer

2024-04-11 Thread Andrea Aime 
See notes inline below:


On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:53 PM Erik Böhm  wrote:

>
> As some of those features are important for us, we are evaluating the
> option to take on this suggestion. In that sense, and because I did not
> find anything on the GeoServer Community sites, I wanted to ask how we
> could manage this, which options there would be and which would be the one
> preferred by you.
>
> How would it work if we would hire a contractor and contribute these
> features to GeoServer?
>

The GeoServer commercial support  page
offers a list of companies that can take on this kind of task.


> And for the specific feature of the GeoServer being able to fully
> interpret all definitions in SLDs exported from QGIS, would you be able to
> guess the amount of work this would take? In that way, we maybe could
> estimate the costs of hiring a developer for this feature.
>

As others, I'd urge you to come out with a specific list of features that
are missing. In GeoSolutions we did an analysis in the past and come up
with a variety of issues

   - Bits that could be exported to SLD, but are not (e.g., attribute
   dependent values and expressions)
   - Bits that are exported, but using invalid SLD syntax
   - Bits that cannot be exported, because there is no equivalent SLD syntax

The list is large, making an estimate is not very likely. Rather than "I
want to export everything possible",
approach the commercial support providers with a firm list of features you
need instead.

Cheers
Andrea
___
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Re: [Geoserver-users] Possible ways and costs for specific developments/improvements for GeoServer

2024-04-11 Thread Alexandre Gacon 
Have you tried also the geocat bridge qgis plugin?

Alexandre

Le mer. 10 avr. 2024 à 20:53, Ian Turton  a écrit :

> To start with you would need to clearly list exactly which features of the
> SLD generated by QGIS that are not understood by GeoServer.
>
> Ian
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 15:50, Erik Böhm  wrote:
>
>> Hello all, or rather hello developers!
>>
>>
>>
>> In don’t know if this is the right way to contact you. So if there is a
>> better way, please give me a hint J
>>
>>
>>
>> My Question is:
>>
>> While using GeoServer to publish our data via services, we experienced
>> some bugs or rather lacks of features, e. g. the interpretation of some
>> definitions in SLDs that were exported from QGIS.
>>
>> The response/solution of the community to those issues has been to fund
>> further development of those parts.
>>
>>
>>
>> As some of those features are important for us, we are evaluating the
>> option to take on this suggestion. In that sense, and because I did not
>> find anything on the GeoServer Community sites, I wanted to ask how we
>> could manage this, which options there would be and which would be the one
>> preferred by you.
>>
>> How would it work if we would hire a contractor and contribute these
>> features to GeoServer?
>>
>>
>>
>> And for the specific feature of the GeoServer being able to fully
>> interpret all definitions in SLDs exported from QGIS, would you be able to
>> guess the amount of work this would take? In that way, we maybe could
>> estimate the costs of hiring a developer for this feature.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> With kind regards
>>
>>
>> Erik Böhm
>>
>>
>> Erik Böhm (MDZ2207)
>>
>> Open Data Coordination
>> Tel: +49 40 3190-3429
>> Bernhard-Nocht-Straße 78 | 20359 Hamburg
>> erik.bo...@bsh.de
>>
>>
>> The Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency is a higher federal agency
>> under the Federal Ministry for Digital and Transport
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Geoserver-users mailing list
>>
>> Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to
>> this list:
>> - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton:
>> http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
>> - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines:
>> http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html
>>
>> If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this:
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer
>>
>>
>> Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>>
>
>
> --
> Ian Turton
> ___
> Geoserver-users mailing list
>
> Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to
> this list:
> - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton:
> http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
> - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines:
> http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html
>
> If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this:
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer
>
>
> Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>
___
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Re: [Geoserver-users] Possible ways and costs for specific developments/improvements for GeoServer

2024-04-10 Thread Ian Turton 
To start with you would need to clearly list exactly which features of the
SLD generated by QGIS that are not understood by GeoServer.

Ian

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 15:50, Erik Böhm  wrote:

> Hello all, or rather hello developers!
>
>
>
> In don’t know if this is the right way to contact you. So if there is a
> better way, please give me a hint J
>
>
>
> My Question is:
>
> While using GeoServer to publish our data via services, we experienced
> some bugs or rather lacks of features, e. g. the interpretation of some
> definitions in SLDs that were exported from QGIS.
>
> The response/solution of the community to those issues has been to fund
> further development of those parts.
>
>
>
> As some of those features are important for us, we are evaluating the
> option to take on this suggestion. In that sense, and because I did not
> find anything on the GeoServer Community sites, I wanted to ask how we
> could manage this, which options there would be and which would be the one
> preferred by you.
>
> How would it work if we would hire a contractor and contribute these
> features to GeoServer?
>
>
>
> And for the specific feature of the GeoServer being able to fully
> interpret all definitions in SLDs exported from QGIS, would you be able to
> guess the amount of work this would take? In that way, we maybe could
> estimate the costs of hiring a developer for this feature.
>
>
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
>
>
>
>
> With kind regards
>
>
> Erik Böhm
>
>
> Erik Böhm (MDZ2207)
>
> Open Data Coordination
> Tel: +49 40 3190-3429
> Bernhard-Nocht-Straße 78 | 20359 Hamburg
> erik.bo...@bsh.de
>
>
> The Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency is a higher federal agency
> under the Federal Ministry for Digital and Transport
>
>
> ___
> Geoserver-users mailing list
>
> Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to
> this list:
> - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton:
> http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
> - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines:
> http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html
>
> If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this:
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer
>
>
> Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>


-- 
Ian Turton
___
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

[Geoserver-users] Possible ways and costs for specific developments/improvements for GeoServer

2024-04-10 Thread Erik Böhm 
Hello all, or rather hello developers!

In don't know if this is the right way to contact you. So if there is a better 
way, please give me a hint :)

My Question is:
While using GeoServer to publish our data via services, we experienced some 
bugs or rather lacks of features, e. g. the interpretation of some definitions 
in SLDs that were exported from QGIS.
The response/solution of the community to those issues has been to fund further 
development of those parts.

As some of those features are important for us, we are evaluating the option to 
take on this suggestion. In that sense, and because I did not find anything on 
the GeoServer Community sites, I wanted to ask how we could manage this, which 
options there would be and which would be the one preferred by you.
How would it work if we would hire a contractor and contribute these features 
to GeoServer?

And for the specific feature of the GeoServer being able to fully interpret all 
definitions in SLDs exported from QGIS, would you be able to guess the amount 
of work this would take? In that way, we maybe could estimate the costs of 
hiring a developer for this feature.

Thank you in advance!


With kind regards

Erik Böhm

Erik Böhm (MDZ2207)
Open Data Coordination
Tel: +49 40 3190-3429
Bernhard-Nocht-Straße 78 | 20359 Hamburg
erik.bo...@bsh.de

The Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency is a higher federal agency under 
the Federal Ministry for Digital and Transport

___
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users