[GHC Proposal] "Constraint to Bool" wired-in type family
Hello everyone, Sylvain Henry just opened Pull Request #22 [1] against the ghc-proposals repository. This proposal describes a type family which would given users access to type-level evidence of the satisfiability of a constraint. Please feel free to read and discuss the proposal on the pull request. Cheers, - Ben [1] https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/22 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
Re: GHC Trac spam filter is rejecting new registrations
Robert Hendersonwrites: > Hi, > > I've been trying to register a new account on GHC Trac in order to > submit a bug report, and I'm getting the following error: > > Submission rejected as potential spam > SpamBayes determined spam probability of 90.82% > Oh dear, very sorry about that. I've adjusted the spam filter configuration; can you try again? > Could this be a bug or issue with a recent release of the Trac software? > I've noticed people complaining about the same problem on other websites > that use Trac, e.g.: > It's not a bug; it's just that spammers are quite good at emulating humans and unfortunately Trac doesn't have very strong tools for catching them. We use a Bayesian spam classifier to catch Trac spam, but sadly it's imperfect. Thanks for bringing up your issue! Cheers, - Ben signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
GHC Trac spam filter is rejecting new registrations
Hi, I've been trying to register a new account on GHC Trac in order to submit a bug report, and I'm getting the following error: Submission rejected as potential spam SpamBayes determined spam probability of 90.82% Could this be a bug or issue with a recent release of the Trac software? I've noticed people complaining about the same problem on other websites that use Trac, e.g.: https://dev.haiku-os.org/ticket/12947 https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=67711 Thanks, Rob Henderson ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
RE: Testsuite threadsafety
Thanks! Had missed the spawning of a new process part. From: Ben Gamari Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2016 00:12 To: loneti...@gmail.com; ghc-devs@haskell.org Subject: Re: Testsuite threadsafety loneti...@gmail.com writes: > Hi *, > > I’m trying to understand a few pieces of code in the testsuite, > > As it so happens quite a few tests randomly fail on newer msys2 and python > installs: > >r:/temp/ghctest-0u4c8o/test spaces/./th/T12407.run > T12407 [ext-interp] ([Error 183] Cannot create a file when that > file already exists: 'r:/temp/ghctest-0u4c8o/test spaces/./th/T12407.run') >r:/temp/ghctest-0u4c8o/test spaces/./th/T11463.run > T11463 [ext-interp] ([Error 183] Cannot create a file when that > file already exists: 'r:/temp/ghctest-0u4c8o/test spaces/./th/T11463.run') >r:/temp/ghctest-0u4c8o/test spaces/./th/T12478_4.run > T12478_4 [ext-interp] ([Error 183] Cannot create a file when > that file already exists: 'r:/temp/ghctest-0u4c8o/test > spaces/./th/T12478_4.run') >r:/temp/ghctest-0u4c8o/test spaces/./th/T12478_3.run > T12478_3 [ext-interp] ([Error 183] Cannot create a file when > that file already exists: 'r:/temp/ghctest-0u4c8o/test > spaces/./th/T12478_3.run') > > (I say random, but the set of tests seem to be the same ones, just within > that group a few randomly pass every so often. It’s mostly TH tests.) > > Anyone have any ideas? I’m not very familiar with the internals of the > testsuite. > > Secondly, I’ve noticed all paths in the testsuite are relative paths. And > this hand me wondering, relative to what. > > I see that in do_test we actually change directories > > 837 if opts.pre_cmd: > 838 exit_code = runCmd('cd "{0}" && {1}'.format(opts.testdir, > opts.pre_cmd)) > If I understand this correctly, this is merely spawning off a child shell process which then moves its own cwd to opts.testdir. This should not affect the cwd of the testsuite driver, which means that it should be perfectly safe. Cheers, - Ben ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs