Re: HsVectInstIn is dead code?

[Manuel M T Chakravarty]

Hi Alan,

You can remove ’HsVectInstIn’ as well as ’HsVectInstOut’ for that matter.

Thanks,
Manuel

> 20.04.2018 23:21 Alan & Kim Zimmerman :
> 
> If I grep through the GHC source, or do a github search[1]
> 
> It seems that HsVectInst exists, and can be renamed, typechecked, zonked, 
> desugared.
> 
> But it does not get parse, and does not appear to be introduced in any other 
> way.
> 
> Am I missing something? Should it be deleted (as hinted at in one of the 
> comments?)
> 
> Alan
> 
> [1] https://github.com/ghc/ghc/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93=HsVectInstIn= 
> 
> 
> ___
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

RE: HsVectInstIn is dead code?

[Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs]

Manuel

Can you comment on this?   You’ve argued for keeping the vectorisation code in, 
but is this particular data constructor in VectDecl used?

Simon

From: ghc-devs <ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org> On Behalf Of Alan & Kim Zimmerman
Sent: 20 April 2018 14:21
To: ghc-devs <ghc-devs@haskell.org>
Subject: HsVectInstIn is dead code?

If I grep through the GHC source, or do a github search[1]
It seems that HsVectInst exists, and can be renamed, typechecked, zonked, 
desugared.

But it does not get parse, and does not appear to be introduced in any other 
way.

Am I missing something? Should it be deleted (as hinted at in one of the 
comments?)

Alan

[1] https://github.com/ghc/ghc/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93=HsVectInstIn=
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

HsVectInstIn is dead code?

[Alan & Kim Zimmerman]

If I grep through the GHC source, or do a github search[1]

It seems that HsVectInst exists, and can be renamed, typechecked, zonked,
desugared.

But it does not get parse, and does not appear to be introduced in any
other way.

Am I missing something? Should it be deleted (as hinted at in one of the
comments?)

Alan

[1] https://github.com/ghc/ghc/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93=HsVectInstIn=
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs