[Gimp-developer] Re: Photoshop Plugin Support

2002-12-12 Thread Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-12-12 at 1550.09 -0500):
 First I would like to say Im not trying to start a flamewar here... but will
 the win32 Gimp target ever support Photoshop plugins,

Seaching in Google you can see http://www.gimp.org/ (scroll down to
GIMP 1.2.3 for Windows Released) or a more precise thing like
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2001-December/006179.html

You can try places like http://registry.gimp.org/ too, and you will
find that user filter make filter factory plugins-kind work too.

So seems at least some kind works, dunno if the factory ones are the
same than the 8bf ones, or if there a lot of other kinds, but at least
one does, maybe more.

 and will the *nix x86
 Gimp target ever support Photoshop plugins via Wine?

Dunno, if anybody wants and tries, maybe. Other option is to recode
them from scratch (more portable, fixable, probably without money
charge, etc).

GSR
 
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



[Gimp-developer] Photoshop Plugin Support

2002-12-12 Thread Patrick McFarland
Hey all, its me again.

First I would like to say Im not trying to start a flamewar here... but will
the win32 Gimp target ever support Photoshop plugins, and will the *nix x86
Gimp target ever support Photoshop plugins via Wine?

-- 
Patrick Diablo-D3 McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd 
all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to
repetitive electronic music. --Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989


msg03393/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


re: [Gimp-developer] 1.3.10 failing to use system fonts.

2002-12-12 Thread Matthew Lewis



After some research, I've discovered some things 
about fonts, gimp, and linux. (Some of this may be old news to many of you, but 
it was new to me because I'm not a font expert.) On RH8.0 (and probably other 
dist's as well) there are 3 font handlers. The first is the traditional X font 
server "xfs" or "xfstt" on some systems. The other two font handlers are Xft and 
the new Xft2. Xfs gets it's configuration from the familiar /etc/X11/XF86Config 
file and from /etc/X11/fs/config. Nothing new here. The Xft font handler uses 
/etc/X11/XftConfig for it's config (it may also be in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11 as 
well). But the newest version of Xft called Xft2 uses a pair of new config files 
which live in /etc/fonts called "fonts.conf" and "fonts.dtd".

It seems that Gnome now uses Xft2 for it's fonts 
because when I added the directories to the new config file, then ran "fc-cache" 
in the font directory, the new fonts suddenly became available to Gnome 
applications with the exception ofGimp. I also added the new font 
directories to the older XftConfig file so that they would be available to any 
app using Xft. Gimp now sees the fonts, but only about a third of them look 
right. The other two-thirds seem to be usinga default font in place of the 
actual selected font. So for example, if I chose one of the microsoft fonts, I 
get the default "sans" font instead.

This situtation kinda sucks because I have a lot of 
nice looking fonts which are useless under 1.3.10, but work perfectly under 
1.2.3. I'm not sure why the font hadlers have become so fragmented under 
X/Gnome/Gimp, but it would be nice if there was some way to regain the use of 
the font libraries which worked under earlier versions of 
Gimp.