Re: [Gimp-developer] Lanczos algorithm funnyness?

2005-11-19 Thread Adam D. Moss

Steve Stavropoulos wrote:

On 11/19/05, Dag Rune Sneeggen wrote:


John Leach wrote:


Looking at the original, I can see what it's accentuating but it looks
bad. Other photos look great, much sharper compared with the cubic
algorithm.  This seems rather too sharp, in the wrong place.


But still, its clearly a faulty algorithm... Quite serious as well(?)


 Am I the only one who sees the lanczos produced image, as a near
perfect resize of the original?


Yes, actually looks like a very interesting resize result to me
too.  Guess it's pretty subjective.

--adam
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Lanczos algorithm funnyness?

2005-11-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

John Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I just downloaded the 2.3.5 snapshot and had a go with the Lanczos
 resizing algorithm.  It seems to bring out some strange artifacts in
 one photo (actually, the first I randomly tried).

The Lanczos implementation in CVS is buggy and unless someone shows up
who fixes it, it will most likely end up being removed before the 2.4
release.


Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Fast Fixes!

2005-11-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Tim E. Jedlicka - wrk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Could be an interesting trivia item - the shortest interval from
 Open to Fixed.

Look for example at bug #321855. It was fixed three days before it
even has been reported ;)


Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Re: Lanczos algorithm funnyness?

2005-11-19 Thread Roel Schroeven
Sven Neumann wrote:
 Hi,
 
 John Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 
I just downloaded the 2.3.5 snapshot and had a go with the Lanczos
resizing algorithm.  It seems to bring out some strange artifacts in
one photo (actually, the first I randomly tried).
 
 
 The Lanczos implementation in CVS is buggy and unless someone shows up
 who fixes it, it will most likely end up being removed before the 2.4
 release.

I might take a shot at fixing that, if I can find enough time to do it.

Is it bug 305928 you mean? On first sight that is more about the
interaction between Lanczos and the perspective tool than about Lanczos
itself.

-- 
If I have been able to see further, it was only because I stood
on the shoulders of giants.  -- Isaac Newton

Roel Schroeven

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer