Re: [Gimp-developer] Artifacts after scaling, rotation... in 2.9 git

2014-10-28 Thread Nicolas Robidoux
I looked at DSC00434_1600.​png and it smells like a tiling subsystem bug to
me.
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] Artifacts after scaling, rotation... in 2.9 git

2014-10-28 Thread Michael Henning
I can reproduce this problem. I'm going to guess that the issue is
that the nohalo code is interacting badly with the sampler caching
code in gegl, which has been rewritten since the nohalo code was
originally written. Someone should probably look into that.

  -- drawoc

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich
alexander.v.rabtchev...@gmx.net wrote:
 Because of the size. It seems the whole letter size should be smaller than
 40k. It will be easier to use external links.

 The original tiff
 https://yadi.sk/i/J1bi__FhcKvUJ


 The result of image resizing to 1600 pixels with nohalo.
 https://yadi.sk/i/bLjZia4ccKtHK

 Mint 17 x64, mate, AMD Phenom II X6 1075T Processor, 12 Gb RAM, built-in
 Radeon HD 4290 (no OpenCl).

 With respect,
 Alexander Rabtchevich


 Paka wrote:

 * Alexander Rabtchevich alexander.v.rabtchev...@gmx.net [10-27-14
 12:40]:

 I guess the enclosure were deleted. Here is the smaller file (jpg). I
 can upload the original tiff to the internet to reproduce my actions.

 With respect,
 Alexander Rabtchevich

 Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

 On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:

 Here is an example after scaling (a crop from the image).

 Where? :)

 Alex
 ___
 gimp-developer-list mailing list
 List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
 List membership:
 https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
 List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

 ___
 gimp-developer-list mailing list
 List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
 List membership:
 https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
 List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

 so if enclosures are deleted, why do you expect a smaller file to
 survive?


 ___
 gimp-developer-list mailing list
 List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
 List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
 List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] Artifacts after scaling, rotation... in 2.9 git

2014-10-27 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:

 Here is an example after scaling (a crop from the image).

Where? :)

Alex
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] Artifacts after scaling, rotation... in 2.9 git

2014-10-27 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
I guess the enclosure were deleted. Here is the smaller file (jpg). I 
can upload the original tiff to the internet to reproduce my actions.


With respect,
Alexander Rabtchevich

Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:


Here is an example after scaling (a crop from the image).

Where? :)

Alex
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list



___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] Artifacts after scaling, rotation... in 2.9 git

2014-10-27 Thread Paka
* Alexander Rabtchevich alexander.v.rabtchev...@gmx.net [10-27-14 12:40]:
 I guess the enclosure were deleted. Here is the smaller file (jpg). I
 can upload the original tiff to the internet to reproduce my actions.
 
 With respect,
 Alexander Rabtchevich
 
 Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
 On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
 
 Here is an example after scaling (a crop from the image).
 Where? :)
 
 Alex
 ___
 gimp-developer-list mailing list
 List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
 List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
 List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
 
 
 ___
 gimp-developer-list mailing list
 List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
 List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
 List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

so if enclosures are deleted, why do you expect a smaller file to
survive?
-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] Artifacts after scaling, rotation... in 2.9 git

2014-10-27 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
Because of the size. It seems the whole letter size should be smaller 
than 40k. It will be easier to use external links.


The original tiff
https://yadi.sk/i/J1bi__FhcKvUJ


The result of image resizing to 1600 pixels with nohalo.
https://yadi.sk/i/bLjZia4ccKtHK

Mint 17 x64, mate, AMD Phenom II X6 1075T Processor, 12 Gb RAM, built-in 
Radeon HD 4290 (no OpenCl).


With respect,
Alexander Rabtchevich

Paka wrote:

* Alexander Rabtchevich alexander.v.rabtchev...@gmx.net [10-27-14 12:40]:

I guess the enclosure were deleted. Here is the smaller file (jpg). I
can upload the original tiff to the internet to reproduce my actions.

With respect,
Alexander Rabtchevich

Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:


Here is an example after scaling (a crop from the image).

Where? :)

Alex
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

so if enclosures are deleted, why do you expect a smaller file to
survive?


___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list