Re: [Gimp-developer] Regressions

2018-10-05 Thread Diogo Piçarra via gimp-developer-list
Thanks for your reply.

> While I have created the bug report, I don't think this one is a major
> issue. There are work-arounds (in most cases you
> can just flip the path..., and there are also scripts to reverse the
> path direction).

This bug is just an example.
I think all regressions, data loss problems and most crashes are major.
When a user updates from 2.8 to 2.10 he expects that everything keeps working.
I've been looking in to bug tracker and i've seen many cases of users
who had to go back to
2.8 because 2.10 still have important regressions. Until that it's not
fixed, 2.10 can't be considered stable.
I can't recommend anybody to update to 2.10 when I know some things
that where working are not
working anymore.

> Gimp is mostly community-based, and the community isn't helping much.
> The code change that creates the bug is two years old, so this bug has
> been around in the 2.9 version and the 2.10 release candidates,  and no
> one encountered it? Reporting bugs is a service to developers... It's
> almost a way to thank them :)

I Know all that. I know that nobody is working on Gimp full time.
I already contributed with code to some open source projects and already replied
to some Gimp issues with ideas to help fix some bugs.
I'am just trying to help with some ideas to improve bug triage. It's
all I can do for now.
Adding the tags I suggested It's a way to get more attention to the
regressions so they are not forgotten.
Then hire 1 guy for 1 month full time. Should be enough for most regressions.

I'am still hoping for a reply from schumaml or one of the main developers.

Thanks.
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] Regressions

2018-09-30 Thread Ofnuts

On 09/30/18 03:32, Diogo Piçarra via gimp-developer-list wrote:

Please create "regression" and "data loss" tags on gitlab. Make them
topmost priority and fix all regressions, data losses and most crashes
before releasing a new "stable" version.
Or use the money you just got to hire somebody to do that.
Maybe starting with this:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/issues/1439
This is "totally unacceptable" and probably easy to fix but it's not fixed yet.


While I have created the bug report, I don't think this one is a major 
issue. There are work-arounds (in most cases you
can just flip the path..., and there are also scripts to reverse the 
path direction).


Gimp is mostly community-based, and the community isn't helping much. 
The code change that creates the bug is two years old, so this bug has 
been around in the 2.9 version and the 2.10 release candidates,  and no 
one encountered it? Reporting bugs is a service to developers... It's 
almost a way to thank them :)

___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


[Gimp-developer] Regressions

2018-09-29 Thread Diogo Piçarra via gimp-developer-list
Please create "regression" and "data loss" tags on gitlab. Make them
topmost priority and fix all regressions, data losses and most crashes
before releasing a new "stable" version.
Or use the money you just got to hire somebody to do that.
Maybe starting with this:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/issues/1439
This is "totally unacceptable" and probably easy to fix but it's not fixed yet.

Thanks
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list