Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP cloned from git

2011-01-28 Thread Julien Hardelin

> Check whether you have the development packages for dbus installed.
> ___

On my opensuse-11.3 64-bits, I have installed:
dbus1-1.2.24
dbus1.devel-1.2.24
dbus1-glib-0.86
dbus1-python-0.83
dbus1-X11-1.2.24

I resolved my problem using ./autogen.sh --without-dbus. GIMP-2.7 seems
to work normally.

What is dbus useful for?

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP cloned from git

2011-01-28 Thread Kevin Cozens
Julien Hardelin wrote:
> Hi,
> "make" gives this error:
> 
> gimpdbusservice.c: in function 'gimp_dbus_service_class_init'
> gimpdbusservice.c: 101:37 : error: 'dbus_glib_gimp_object_info'
> undeclared (first use in this function)

Check whether you have the development packages for dbus installed.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows XP - Service Pack?

2011-01-28 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:51:04 +, jack white wrote:

> Is there a way to trick 2.6.11 into installing on XP with no SP's installed?

Install SP2, install GIMP, uninstall SP2.

-- 
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows XP - Service Pack?

2011-01-28 Thread jack white

Is there a way to trick 2.6.11 into installing on XP with no SP's installed?

> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 05:03:25 +
> From: jack white 
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Windows XP - Service Pack?
> To: 
>
> 
> Except that 2.6.6 installs without SP2, but 2.6.11 won't install without it.
> 
> > Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:20:17 +0100
> > From: Jernej Simon?i? 
> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Windows XP - Service Pack?
> > To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> > 
> > On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:21:11 +, jack white wrote:
> > 
> > > I noticed the 2.6.11 says SP2 is required for Windows XP. I know 2.6.6 
> > > works fine without a Service Pack.  Does 2.6.11 really require SP2?  If 
> > > so, is 2.6.7 the first version to require it?
> > 
> > I've had the SP2 requirement in the installer for a long time (since GIMP
> > 2.6.2 according to my changelog). GIMP would probably work on XP without
> > any service packs, however I was getting too many weird error reports
> > (which weren't reproducible with SP2 and SP3) that I decided to not bother
> > with anything older (Microsoft also dropped support for XP without SP2 a
> > while ago, and the service packs are a free upgrade, so I see no reason to
> > waste my time with unsupported Windows versions).

  ___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Font control

2011-01-28 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
> I apologise for any ignorance, but it the new Gimp release going to
> include better font management?
>
> For example, if I type something and rotate it, Gimp automatically
> rasterises it.  It would be great if this didn't happen.

Rich text formatting -- yes
On-canvas editing -- yes
Rotated editable text -- no, at least not yet

Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Can't access Script-Fu

2011-01-28 Thread Rob Antonishen
 mamboze wrote:
These are Script-Fu > Layer Effects > Drop Shadow,
>> ...> Inner Shadow, ...> Bevel and Emboss.
>
I think these are from the Layer Effects script:
http://registry.gimp.org/node/186

Did you install these appropriately?

-Rob A>
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Scaling / rotating images and focus

2011-01-28 Thread Rob Antonishen
Not sure about GEGL previews, bu there is a new transform tool spec:

http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Transformation_tool_specification

To combine scale, shear and rotate into one tool.  No mention of how
previews are to be handled, however.

-Rob A>

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Jeremy Nell  wrote:
> I must have missed that response.
>
> Thanks.  Looking forward to the new release!
>
>
> On 28/01/2011 11:09, Tőkés Ábel wrote:
>
> Øyvind have already answered your question:
>
> "It indeed is, and this should eventually solve itself as GEGL is more
> properly integrated with the layer stack of GIMP and what is shown is
> no longer a preview but the actual result. For now the preview is a
> hack that provides better visual feedback than just a bounding box or
> a wireframe grid.
>
> /Øyvind K."
>
> This means that your request will be automatically solved in the future
> release.
> You don't have much chance that anyone will spend his/her time by writing a
> temporary solution.
>
> Abel
>
>
>
> On 1/28/2011 9:58 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
>
> How does one go about requesting this as a feature enhancement?
>
> To include this in Gimp would vastly improve usability in this regard, as
> well as making logical (and practical) sense.
>
>
>
> On 26/01/2011 12:14, Jeremy Nell wrote:
>
> Except that the opacity slider makes it tougher to see the preview as the
> opacity is made less.
>
> But that's besides the point.
>
> 1.  If I've set the opacity of the layer, then the opacity of that layer
> should remain as is when I scale / rotate.
> 2.  When I scale / rotate, the layer's position in the stack should remain
> in its place, rather than suddenly appear at the top of every layer when
> being rotated / scaled.
>
> Surely, this is a reasonable request?
>
>
> On 26/01/2011 12:06, Ofnuts wrote:
>
> On 01/26/2011 09:22 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
>
> The more I work in Gimp, the more I realise that this is something that
> needs to be looked at by the developers, as it is not very intuitive.
>
> Again, I've found how the focus of the image being rotated / scaled
> interferes with the rest of the working area.  For example, if I set a
> particular layer's opacity to 20% and the layer is at the bottom of all
> other layers, why, then, does the opacity become 100% and the layer suddenly
> appear on top of all other layers?
>
> This makes it very difficult to work efficiently.
>
> Is there a way to fix this / work around it?
>
> The Scale and Rotate tools have an opacity slider for the preview...
>
>
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Font control

2011-01-28 Thread Jeremy Nell
I apologise for any ignorance, but it the new Gimp release going to 
include better font management?

For example, if I type something and rotate it, Gimp automatically 
rasterises it.  It would be great if this didn't happen.

What, if any, updates to Gimp's font management will be coming?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Scaling / rotating images and focus

2011-01-28 Thread Jeremy Nell

I must have missed that response.

Thanks.  Looking forward to the new release!


On 28/01/2011 11:09, Tőkés Ábel wrote:

Øyvind have already answered your question:

"It indeed is, and this should eventually solve itself as GEGL is more
properly integrated with the layer stack of GIMP and what is shown is
no longer a preview but the actual result. For now the preview is a
hack that provides better visual feedback than just a bounding box or
a wireframe grid.

/Øyvind K."

This means that your request will be automatically solved in the future release.
You don't have much chance that anyone will spend his/her time by writing a 
temporary solution.

Abel



On 1/28/2011 9:58 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:

How does one go about requesting this as a feature enhancement?

To include this in Gimp would vastly improve usability in this 
regard, as well as making logical (and practical) sense.




On 26/01/2011 12:14, Jeremy Nell wrote:
Except that the opacity slider makes it tougher to see the preview 
as the opacity is made less.


But that's besides the point.

1.  If I've set the opacity of the layer, then the opacity of that 
layer should remain as is when I scale / rotate.
2.  When I scale / rotate, the layer's position in the stack should 
remain in its place, rather than suddenly appear at the top of every 
layer when being rotated / scaled.


Surely, this is a reasonable request?


On 26/01/2011 12:06, Ofnuts wrote:

On 01/26/2011 09:22 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
The more I work in Gimp, the more I realise that this is something 
that needs to be looked at by the developers, as it is not very 
intuitive.


Again, I've found how the focus of the image being rotated / 
scaled interferes with the rest of the working area.  For example, 
if I set a particular layer's opacity to 20% and the layer is at 
the bottom of all other layers, why, then, does the opacity become 
100% and the layer suddenly appear on top of all other layers?


This makes it very difficult to work efficiently.

Is there a way to fix this / work around it?


The Scale and Rotate tools have an opacity slider for the preview...



___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user



___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user



___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Scaling / rotating images and focus

2011-01-28 Thread Tőkés Ábel

Øyvind have already answered your question:

"It indeed is, and this should eventually solve itself as GEGL is more
properly integrated with the layer stack of GIMP and what is shown is
no longer a preview but the actual result. For now the preview is a
hack that provides better visual feedback than just a bounding box or
a wireframe grid.

/Øyvind K."

This means that your request will be automatically solved in the future release.
You don't have much chance that anyone will spend his/her time by writing a 
temporary solution.

Abel




On 1/28/2011 9:58 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:

How does one go about requesting this as a feature enhancement?

To include this in Gimp would vastly improve usability in this regard, 
as well as making logical (and practical) sense.




On 26/01/2011 12:14, Jeremy Nell wrote:
Except that the opacity slider makes it tougher to see the preview as 
the opacity is made less.


But that's besides the point.

1.  If I've set the opacity of the layer, then the opacity of that 
layer should remain as is when I scale / rotate.
2.  When I scale / rotate, the layer's position in the stack should 
remain in its place, rather than suddenly appear at the top of every 
layer when being rotated / scaled.


Surely, this is a reasonable request?


On 26/01/2011 12:06, Ofnuts wrote:

On 01/26/2011 09:22 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
The more I work in Gimp, the more I realise that this is something 
that needs to be looked at by the developers, as it is not very 
intuitive.


Again, I've found how the focus of the image being rotated / scaled 
interferes with the rest of the working area.  For example, if I 
set a particular layer's opacity to 20% and the layer is at the 
bottom of all other layers, why, then, does the opacity become 100% 
and the layer suddenly appear on top of all other layers?


This makes it very difficult to work efficiently.

Is there a way to fix this / work around it?


The Scale and Rotate tools have an opacity slider for the preview...



___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user



___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Scaling / rotating images and focus

2011-01-28 Thread Jeremy Nell

How does one go about requesting this as a feature enhancement?

To include this in Gimp would vastly improve usability in this regard, 
as well as making logical (and practical) sense.




On 26/01/2011 12:14, Jeremy Nell wrote:
Except that the opacity slider makes it tougher to see the preview as 
the opacity is made less.


But that's besides the point.

1.  If I've set the opacity of the layer, then the opacity of that 
layer should remain as is when I scale / rotate.
2.  When I scale / rotate, the layer's position in the stack should 
remain in its place, rather than suddenly appear at the top of every 
layer when being rotated / scaled.


Surely, this is a reasonable request?


On 26/01/2011 12:06, Ofnuts wrote:

On 01/26/2011 09:22 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
The more I work in Gimp, the more I realise that this is something 
that needs to be looked at by the developers, as it is not very 
intuitive.


Again, I've found how the focus of the image being rotated / scaled 
interferes with the rest of the working area.  For example, if I set 
a particular layer's opacity to 20% and the layer is at the bottom 
of all other layers, why, then, does the opacity become 100% and the 
layer suddenly appear on top of all other layers?


This makes it very difficult to work efficiently.

Is there a way to fix this / work around it?


The Scale and Rotate tools have an opacity slider for the preview...



___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user