Re: [Gimp-user] Terrible time to get 2.01 running
Hello, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: take advantage of the linux origins of the software. building your ownglib is very easy. it does not even need a lot of disc space. Easy to build glibc, but much easier to hose your whole system(everything) if glibc isn't built right. Also, expect to need about 1/2 GB of disc space to build. m2c Steve ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Terrible time to get 2.01 running
Hello, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: glib != glibc slaps palm to forhead. Sorry about adding noise, wasn't following thread to closely. Steve ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Terrible time to get 2.01 running
Hello, Forwarring, I haven't used Suse in a very long time, and I rarely use pkg-config, so I may be leading you down a wrong road. Robert Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I need is for someone to work with me to find out how to eliminate all traces of 2.3.6 so pkg-config doesn't see two versions. pkg-config stores looks for info in *.pc files . See if they are any in your gimp*/lib/ or any where on your system. Also, what does: $ echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH give you? Steve ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
