Re: [Gimp-user] User interface color
On 04/01/2017 02:47 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > > On 04/01/2017 05:40 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:25 PM, ldubia wrote: >>> Gimp loads with a white background and I would like to make it a dark grey >>> background. How do I do this? >> >> https://docs.gimp.org/2.8/en/gimp-pimping.html#gimp-prefs-image-window-appearance >> >> You need to change the "Custom padding color". > > You might also want to look at some darker / lower color themes for the > rest of the GIMP's parts. I think I found the one I am using here: > > https://www.gnome-look.org/browse/cat/268/order/latest Aha, here's the theme I am using just now. A while back I went on a Holy Quest for GIMP themes, and this was what I settled on: https://gimptutoriali.blogspot.ba/2013/10/dark-theme-tactile-teme-za-gimp.html https://i.imgur.com/4fnnD1u.jpg But according to something else I just saw, the need for such Quests is nearly at an end. Quote: [All of these themes are now a part of GIMP and included by default starting with version 2.9.2] https://github.com/Draekko-RAND/gimp-themes And I see more than one that looks "just right" to me. :o) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] fix-ca not showing in menu (ubuntu)
Hello, I'm new here. I use GIMP quite a lot and so far without many problems (many kudos for the developers!) but this one I can't solve: Fix-ca (the chromatic aberration plug in) does not appear in the menu although it is installed. It shows in the plug-in browser. I have Ubuntu 16.04 64 bits. Gimp version 2.8.20. I removed and reinstalled the complete plug in registry with the package manager, but still it does not show up. Any ideas?? -- Jan_FtFA (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] fix-ca not showing in menu (ubuntu)
>Hello, > >I'm new here. I use GIMP quite a lot and so far without many problems >(many kudos for the developers!) but this one I can't solve: > >Fix-ca (the chromatic aberration plug in) does not appear in the menu >although it is installed. It shows in the plug-in browser. > >I have Ubuntu 16.04 64 bits. Gimp version 2.8.20. > >I removed and reinstalled the complete plug in registry with the >package manager, but still it does not show up. > >Any ideas?? I can confirm the file from the gimp-plugin-registry package does not work. (possibly never been updated since the year dot) Remove whatever you have installed, un-zip the attached zip archive. Put the file fix-ca into your Gimp profile ~/.gimp-2.8/plug-ins Screenshot is Kubuntu 16.04 Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/536/original/fix-ca.zip * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/537/original/fix-ca.jpg -- rich2005 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Who Owns Images Created Using Gimp Tool
Probably not very many. Rick S. -Original Message- From: Kevin Cozens Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2017 1:38 PM To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Who Owns Images Created Using Gimp Tool ... When I see this question pop up now and then on the mailing list I always wonder how many people ask Microsoft the same question when they are thinking of using Photoshop. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] User interface color
On 04/01/2017 05:40 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:25 PM, ldubia wrote: >> Gimp loads with a white background and I would like to make it a dark grey >> background. How do I do this? > > https://docs.gimp.org/2.8/en/gimp-pimping.html#gimp-prefs-image-window-appearance > > You need to change the "Custom padding color". You might also want to look at some darker / lower color themes for the rest of the GIMP's parts. I think I found the one I am using here: https://www.gnome-look.org/browse/cat/268/order/latest :o) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Who Owns Images Created Using Gimp Tool
On 2017-03-28 04:10 PM, Carol Perkins wrote: This may sound unnecessary, but...could you please confirm that I am the owner of the images I have created using this tool and can incorporate them into my own books which I will be selling commercially. The answer is of course you can. When I see this question pop up now and then on the mailing list I always wonder how many people ask Microsoft the same question when they are thinking of using Photoshop. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"Nerds make the shiny things that distract Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | the mouth-breathers, and that's why we're | powerful!" #include | --Chris Hardwick ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Adobe Flash
If the OP uses linux or windows and just needs to extract from an SWF to do further editing, they might look at http://www.swftools.org/ I don't know how well it works. Last update 2012. -c On 04/01/2017 06:33 AM, mdn wrote: For a similar experience for flash player I suggest that you use synfig studio. https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Synfig_Studio Making support for flash player objects would requires a reverse engineering team, a clean room and a lot of time. Adobe never completely released the whole specs. https://web.archive.org/web/20080928202954/http://www.openmedianow.org/?q=node/21 /quote/ One reason for the lack of excitement over the project in the free software world is that it omits "huge amounts" of information needed for a complete implementation of Flash. In particular, Savoye points out that the announcement contains no mention of the Real Time Messaging Protocol(RTMP) that is required for the Flash media server. Nor does it mention the Sorenson Spark Codec that is used for video encoding in Flash 6 and 7, and remains the choice of some users still for Flash video because other formats convert easily to it. Both may be encumbered by patents but, without them, the information that Adobe has released is of limited use. Just as important, what Adobe released is not new to the free Flash community. "Pretty much all of that stuff was known," Otte says. Savoye agrees, remarking, "We figured that all out years ago, or we wouldn't have gotten as far along as we have." Moreover, although Gnash and Swfdec are clean room implementations -- that is, developed without the aid of any information from Adobe -- Savoye suggests that, "Most of this documentation, if we really wanted it, has already leaked out on the Internet years ago." /unquote/ Adobe can implement free/libre versions of other files if they want. They have access to their own code. They have access to other standards without trouble since they were conceived in a sharing mindset to the contrary of the closed adobe flash files. Blame adobe. They aren't doing a very simple task while they have more than the necessary resources to do it. But they won't, because they know it's easier to subject people using their software via closed files. I really recommend stopping using flash. It forces a lot of people to use tools who belongs to a monopoly. Further more, I am very worried about what adobe has began to do with their cloud solution, from what I have see with my brother in "Indesign CC". In their "creative cloud" version when you save your work it gets uploaded to the adobe server to see if you are using copyrighted material (fonts for example) and if you don't have the legal rights to use it then you can't save them, it's basically a DRM. See these posts: https://loadaverage.org/conversation/8497057 note: see the pictures at the bottom of the thread. I hope you'll find what you need while staying in control of your computing. Sincerely BERNARD Le 01/04/2017 01:24, CoreRoll a écrit : Hello I am new to gimp and I want to know if I can open flash animation files with this so I can edit with this software. If no then does anyone know when they will have it? any suggestion that supports adobe flash files? Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/535/original/66f6f62cb9cd9cee1899b1bb9d71352c_how-to-learn-adobe-flash-adobe-flash-clipart_600-600.jpg ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Adobe Flash
For a similar experience for flash player I suggest that you use synfig studio. https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Synfig_Studio Making support for flash player objects would requires a reverse engineering team, a clean room and a lot of time. Adobe never completely released the whole specs. https://web.archive.org/web/20080928202954/http://www.openmedianow.org/?q=node/21 /quote/ One reason for the lack of excitement over the project in the free software world is that it omits "huge amounts" of information needed for a complete implementation of Flash. In particular, Savoye points out that the announcement contains no mention of the Real Time Messaging Protocol(RTMP) that is required for the Flash media server. Nor does it mention the Sorenson Spark Codec that is used for video encoding in Flash 6 and 7, and remains the choice of some users still for Flash video because other formats convert easily to it. Both may be encumbered by patents but, without them, the information that Adobe has released is of limited use. Just as important, what Adobe released is not new to the free Flash community. "Pretty much all of that stuff was known," Otte says. Savoye agrees, remarking, "We figured that all out years ago, or we wouldn't have gotten as far along as we have." Moreover, although Gnash and Swfdec are clean room implementations -- that is, developed without the aid of any information from Adobe -- Savoye suggests that, "Most of this documentation, if we really wanted it, has already leaked out on the Internet years ago." /unquote/ Adobe can implement free/libre versions of other files if they want. They have access to their own code. They have access to other standards without trouble since they were conceived in a sharing mindset to the contrary of the closed adobe flash files. Blame adobe. They aren't doing a very simple task while they have more than the necessary resources to do it. But they won't, because they know it's easier to subject people using their software via closed files. I really recommend stopping using flash. It forces a lot of people to use tools who belongs to a monopoly. Further more, I am very worried about what adobe has began to do with their cloud solution, from what I have see with my brother in "Indesign CC". In their "creative cloud" version when you save your work it gets uploaded to the adobe server to see if you are using copyrighted material (fonts for example) and if you don't have the legal rights to use it then you can't save them, it's basically a DRM. See these posts: https://loadaverage.org/conversation/8497057 note: see the pictures at the bottom of the thread. I hope you'll find what you need while staying in control of your computing. Sincerely BERNARD Le 01/04/2017 01:24, CoreRoll a écrit : > Hello I am new to gimp and I want to know if I can open flash animation files > with this so I can edit with this software. If no then does anyone know when > they will have it? any suggestion that supports adobe flash files? > > Attachments: > * > http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/535/original/66f6f62cb9cd9cee1899b1bb9d71352c_how-to-learn-adobe-flash-adobe-flash-clipart_600-600.jpg > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Adobe Flash
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine < alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 2:24 AM, CoreRoll wrote: > > Hello I am new to gimp and I want to know if I can open flash animation > files > > with this so I can edit with this software. > > You can't. > > > If no then does anyone know when they will have it? > > Never. GIMP is a completely different kind of software. We don't do > vector-based 2D animation. > > > any suggestion that supports adobe flash files? > > Adobe Flash. And yes, I'm serious :) > > Alex > I would not recommend Adobe Flash to anyone. Simply google "security issues with Adobe flash" to understand why. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw Install on Mac?
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Maurizio Loreti wrote: > > > On 30 Mar 2017, at 21:57, Chuanist wrote: > > > > Pat— > > > > thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a > hard nut > > to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw > in the > > previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to use. > > Hello - > I am a satisfied Mac user and an avid photographer; I use for the > post-production of my pictures GIMP, namely the distribution (released by > Simone Karin Lehmann) "GIMP on OS X", available under the URL > http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimponosx . This distribution comes with > a pre-compiled gimp-ufraw plugin; loading a RAW picture in GIMP is handled > in this way. However "GIMP on OS X" lacks a standalone ufraw and > ufraw-batch. Needing for my RAW pictures ufraw-batch, I compiled ufraw and > ufraw-batch from the source code; however this is not completely described > in the ufraw documentation. Here is what I did. > > For the compiler, you need to install Xcode (from the Apple Store, free) > and the Xcode command line tools; how to do that is described in a lot of > places, Google will help. > > For the libraries, I have installed the ones supplied by the Macports > projects: > > +--+--+-+ > | | Package | Version | > +--+--+-+ > | LCMS | lcms2| 2.8 | > | EXIV2| exiv2| 0.25| > | JPEG | jpeg | 9b | > | JPEG2000 | openjpeg | 2.1.2 | > | TIFF | tiff | 4.0.7 | > | PNG | libpng | 1.6.28 | > | ZIP | zip | 3.00| > | BZIP2| bzip2| 1.0.6 | > | LENSFUN | lensfun | 0.3.2 | > | CFITSIO | cfitsio | 3.390 | > | GTKIMAGEVIEW | gtkimageview | 1.6.4 | > +--+--+-+ > > How to install them is described in the Macports home page, > http://www.macports.org . > > The Macports libraries are compiled with clang and clang++ as C and C++ > compilers; while clang and gcc are fully compatible, and their object files > linkable together, clang++ and g++ use different name mangling schemes; so, > if you want e.g. exiv2 support (exiv2 is a C++ package) you need to change > the default compilers. So, finally, I unpacked, configured, compiled and > installed ufraw/ufraw-batch with the following commands: > > tar xzf ufraw-0.22.tar.gz > cd ufraw-0.22/ > CC=clang CXX=clang++ CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/local/include \ > LDFLAGS=-L/opt/local/lib \ > ./configure --prefix=/opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 > make > sudo make install > sudo ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 /opt/local/share/ufraw > ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw ~/Applications/ufraw > ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw-batch ~/Applications/ufraw-batch > ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/share/man/man1/ufraw.1 ~/man/man1/ufraw.1 > > Notes: > - Macports include files are in /opt/local/include . > - Macports libraries are in /opt/local/lib . > - I installed ufraw in /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 , a directory > soft-linked to /opt/local/share/ufraw ; when a new release will > come, say 0.xy, it will be enough to install it in > /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.xy and, then, change the soft link. > - The executables ufraw and ufraw-batch are soft-linked to ~/Applications, > where OS X expects to find user executables. > - I have created ~/man/... for personal man files, and linked there > ufraw.1, in order to have the output of "man ufraw". > > HTH > > -- > Maurizio Loreti -- maurizio.lor...@gmail.com > > > Or install my Mac builds McGimp which comes with a pre-compiled NUFRaw which is the continuation of the UFRaw development. My build also comes with G'MIC. I don't think UFRaw is being maintained now. NUFRaw is currently at version 0.38. I'd also recommend preprocessing with RawTherapee which I am also providing either from my website or RT discussion site hosted by Pat. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw Install on Mac?
> On 30 Mar 2017, at 21:57, Chuanist wrote: > > Pat— > > thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a hard nut > to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw in the > previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to use. Hello - I am a satisfied Mac user and an avid photographer; I use for the post-production of my pictures GIMP, namely the distribution (released by Simone Karin Lehmann) "GIMP on OS X", available under the URL http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimponosx . This distribution comes with a pre-compiled gimp-ufraw plugin; loading a RAW picture in GIMP is handled in this way. However "GIMP on OS X" lacks a standalone ufraw and ufraw-batch. Needing for my RAW pictures ufraw-batch, I compiled ufraw and ufraw-batch from the source code; however this is not completely described in the ufraw documentation. Here is what I did. For the compiler, you need to install Xcode (from the Apple Store, free) and the Xcode command line tools; how to do that is described in a lot of places, Google will help. For the libraries, I have installed the ones supplied by the Macports projects: +--+--+-+ | | Package | Version | +--+--+-+ | LCMS | lcms2| 2.8 | | EXIV2| exiv2| 0.25| | JPEG | jpeg | 9b | | JPEG2000 | openjpeg | 2.1.2 | | TIFF | tiff | 4.0.7 | | PNG | libpng | 1.6.28 | | ZIP | zip | 3.00| | BZIP2| bzip2| 1.0.6 | | LENSFUN | lensfun | 0.3.2 | | CFITSIO | cfitsio | 3.390 | | GTKIMAGEVIEW | gtkimageview | 1.6.4 | +--+--+-+ How to install them is described in the Macports home page, http://www.macports.org . The Macports libraries are compiled with clang and clang++ as C and C++ compilers; while clang and gcc are fully compatible, and their object files linkable together, clang++ and g++ use different name mangling schemes; so, if you want e.g. exiv2 support (exiv2 is a C++ package) you need to change the default compilers. So, finally, I unpacked, configured, compiled and installed ufraw/ufraw-batch with the following commands: tar xzf ufraw-0.22.tar.gz cd ufraw-0.22/ CC=clang CXX=clang++ CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/local/include \ LDFLAGS=-L/opt/local/lib \ ./configure --prefix=/opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 make sudo make install sudo ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 /opt/local/share/ufraw ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw ~/Applications/ufraw ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw-batch ~/Applications/ufraw-batch ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/share/man/man1/ufraw.1 ~/man/man1/ufraw.1 Notes: - Macports include files are in /opt/local/include . - Macports libraries are in /opt/local/lib . - I installed ufraw in /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 , a directory soft-linked to /opt/local/share/ufraw ; when a new release will come, say 0.xy, it will be enough to install it in /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.xy and, then, change the soft link. - The executables ufraw and ufraw-batch are soft-linked to ~/Applications, where OS X expects to find user executables. - I have created ~/man/... for personal man files, and linked there ufraw.1, in order to have the output of "man ufraw". HTH -- Maurizio Loreti -- maurizio.lor...@gmail.com ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] User interface color
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:25 PM, ldubia wrote: > Gimp loads with a white background and I would like to make it a dark grey > background. How do I do this? https://docs.gimp.org/2.8/en/gimp-pimping.html#gimp-prefs-image-window-appearance You need to change the "Custom padding color". Alex ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Adobe Flash
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 2:24 AM, CoreRoll wrote: > Hello I am new to gimp and I want to know if I can open flash animation files > with this so I can edit with this software. You can't. > If no then does anyone know when they will have it? Never. GIMP is a completely different kind of software. We don't do vector-based 2D animation. > any suggestion that supports adobe flash files? Adobe Flash. And yes, I'm serious :) Alex ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Just want to make a SIMPLE GIF
>Sounds awesome! Thanks for taking time to reply. Will try when I am at >computer Thinking about it, bound to run into problems. Extracting a range. You can create all the frames then open the range of images in gimp. A better way is chop the video using something like Avidemux and then applying FFMPEG up to you. A quick video on using FFMPEG in Windows https://youtu.be/PXxECG_6YvA -- rich2005 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Adobe Flash
Hello I am new to gimp and I want to know if I can open flash animation files with this so I can edit with this software. If no then does anyone know when they will have it? any suggestion that supports adobe flash files? Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/535/original/66f6f62cb9cd9cee1899b1bb9d71352c_how-to-learn-adobe-flash-adobe-flash-clipart_600-600.jpg -- CoreRoll (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] User interface color
Gimp loads with a white background and I would like to make it a dark grey background. How do I do this? -- ldubia (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Ufraw Install on Mac?
Pat— thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a hard nut to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw in the previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to use. I will look at the alternatives you suggested. Regards, Glen >It may be easier (or make more sense) to use one of the newer raw >processing softwares available? > >pat -- Chuanist (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
