Re: [Gimp-user] will not launchortcuts produced.
To start GIMP: - Go to GIMP folder > Bin > gimp-2.10.exe - Double click to start. - You can also create your own shortcut from here. Rick S. -Original Message- From: brian catanzaro via gimp-user-list Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 2:48 PM To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org Subject: [Gimp-user] will not launchortcuts produced. Win 10 tablet. tried many times to download and install. program installs but will not open, no shortcuts created. will not launch from program list. love gimp.took may years to learn and enjoy it. brian catanzaro, user. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] no box anymore
On Thu, 2018-08-16 at 12:11 +, peter butterworth via gimp-user-list wrote: > aloha, had the box, text colors, once but i cannot find it anymore. > Advise. Press the tab key. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] no box anymore
чт, 16 авг. 2018 г., 19:58 peter butterworth via gimp-user-list < gimp-user-list@gnome.org>: > aloha, had the box, text colors, once but i cannot find it anymore. Advise. > What box? Toolbox? Seriously, you need to give us more than that to be able to help you. Alex ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] no box anymore
aloha, had the box, text colors, once but i cannot find it anymore. Advise. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] New User Need Help Enlarging/Enhancing Image
On 2018-08-15 15:14, nickib wrote: > Wow - the revision you created is beautiful! Honestly I don’t understand most > of your explanation but the end product would be perfect! Bottom line - how > large - realistically- could that be made and still look good? With my version, *as is*, I wouldn't go crazy, but again, that version doesn't have any 'art filters' applied yet. I would recommend heading over to Image → Scale Image, punch in 300 dpi and then your target size (in inches). Then fiddle with Oilify and/or Gimpressionist. Applying unsharp mask first with a low radius and moderately high intensity (I used 3.0 and 0.6) will help enhance the contrast at edges and may provide more "definition" after the art filter. Anyway, play around, inspect a few areas on your monitor at 100% zoom and, if they look good, go for it. You should probably do a test print at a much smaller size to check that the color comes out acceptably before committing to a large size. You could also print a cropped area from your target size to get a feel for what it looks like. Oilify is okay, but a little plain. I've mostly fiddled with Gimpressionist. Some settings that seem to work well are: - paper: low or zero relief - brush: low or zero relief, crayon08 or play around - orientation: 30 vars, start 0, span 360, adaptive - size: use adaptive, play around with the rest - placement: evenly distributed, crank density to max - color: center, low or zero noise - general: keep original, paint edges, not tilable, no shadow, no edge darken This takes a while time to apply... try experimenting on a small area and go get lunch or something while it works on your whole image. Really, I'd just encourage you to play around with it and see what you like. I was going for a more "accurate" look, but there are all sorts of things you can do if you're willing to sacrifice detail for a more abstract look. Keep in mind your target size also when picking a brush size; larger (100 or more) will look more "realistic" and less like a painting made by an army of ants (i.e. with really tiny brushes). Honestly, with this approach, I think the real limiting factor is how big an image your computer can handle. Crank the brush size up to 200 and you could maybe have something that looks good (at 300dpi) even at 8' (96") wide. -- Matthew ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Smooth stroke no longer woking in 2.10.4.
Had to reboot my PC and downloaded the latest GIMP. I have already found a problem in that when I select "Smooth Stroke" option for my paintbrush. It no longer works. Any ideas? -- Drygon (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Image Crop
Thanks for your help! -- John333 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp 2.10.4 midi not working
On 2018-08-13 11:08 PM, patrick via gimp-user-list wrote: When trying to compile on Raspbian (debian) Stretch, I am not able to install all the deps: - Error: missing dependency babl >= 0.1.52 - Error: missing dependency gegl-0.4 >= 0.4.4 - Error: missing dependency glib >= 2.54.2 *** Test for GLIB failed - Error: missing dependency gegl *** Could not find native gegl executable in your PATH. - Error: missing dependency fontconfig >= 2.12.4 - Error: missing dependency gexiv2 >= 0.10.6 - Error: missing dependency poppler-glib >= 0.44.0 glib >= 2.54.2 is really a show stopper on this distribution afaik. It isn't a show stopper. You can install GIMP and its dependencies to a directory within you user account and run it from there. You set PREFIX to the be the path to the private directory then use that include a reference to the path in both LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PKG_CONFIG_PATH. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ | "Nerds make the shiny things that https://www.patreon.com/KevinCozens | distract the mouth-breathers, and | that's why we're powerful" Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | #include | --Chris Hardwick ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] New User Need Help Enlarging/Enhancing Image
>The more I look at the "lightroom version", the less I like it. For >me, >the orange is oversaturated; I preferred the softer, more "pastel" >look >of the original. Also, the dock is so dark in the original that trying >to recover any detail there doesn't look particularly good to my eye, >besides that I preferred it being just a silhouette anyway. > >I also looked at how I would crop it to 2:1 and... didn't like any of >*those* results either. You either lose a lot of the interesting bits >of >the sky, or the interesting detail on the sand in the lower corner, or >both. If you can keep the original aspect ratio, it might be worth >doing so. > >I decided to play around with it, and came up with this: >JPEG: >https://drive.google.com/file/d/16LIjBfkghhJr-A-6eDQCmlqTAe1mhRVv/view?usp=sharing >XCF: >https://drive.google.com/open?id=12Kp1HUB1tlQNgk2LzQSSh3vcrQg-3lYM > >(I crushed the quality rather severely on the JPEG to get the file >size >down. This is meant as a preview only; the XCF is lossless and >includes >all of the layers that were used to achieve this composition.) > >This reflects how I often process images in order to enhance local >contrast, although I usually throw in one or two mantiuk06 layers as >well. > >- The "equalize contrast" layer is the original, desaturated (I almost >always use luminosity mode), inverted, and then with a Gaussian blur >applied (which I forget to do this time, but the other layers hammer >the >values enough that it doesn't matter in this case). Without the blur, >this will tend to wash out the value range entirely in your image, >leaving you just color. *With* the blur, it will reduce global >contrast >while retaining local contrast; basically, it's a sort of "poor man's >HDR" that will bring back details in your shadows and highlights. In >this case, however, it didn't work very well, though it does keep the >light areas in the clouds from washing out quite so badly. > >- STRESS (Tools → GEGL Operation) is just fun. Not only will it help >your contrast, it has an uncanny ability to remove color bias. Lower >radius and iterations give more local contrast but are also more prone >to noise and artifacts. I usually like to use one layer with the >radius >and iterations as low as possible as a gentle (low opacity) overlay >(i.e. the "overlay" blending mode) to enhance contrast, and another >with >the radius cranked up (the recommendation is "longest image dimension" >— in this case, 4000 — or the max of 5000) and 15+ iterations as an >overall "improvement" layer that I usually blend in heavily or just >outright replace the original image at the bottom of the stack. > >- C2G (also GEGL) is basically STRESS without the color. I've started >more recently using this as an additional overlay layer, as dropping >the >color often lets me get away with using a lower radius without the >resulting artifacts being as bad. In this instance, I thought it made >the shadows on the waves *too* dark, so I added a layer mask to blend >it >out toward the bottom. > >- After playing with the blending on the above to get the contrast I >liked, the sky was *too* blue, so I cloned the original and applied it >with "color" blend mode to bring back some, but not all, of the pink. >Per above, I personally think *some* blue gives character to the >result, >especially thinking of it as a painting and not something trying to be >perfectly realistic. However, you could play with the opacity on this >layer to bring the colors more back toward the original, or also play >with Colors → Hue-Saturation (or maybe Colors → Curves) if you like a >more saturated look. > >I stopped at this point, which basically represents where I felt >satisfied with the overall color and contrast. Per my previous >suggestion, however, what I would do from here is to save this, then >start a new image from 'copy visible', scale it up to your desired >size/DPI, then play around with Oilify, Van Gogh, and/or >Gimpressionist >(or really anything under Filters → Artistic). For this piece, I felt >the best results from gimpressionist were obtained setting the stroke >direction and size both to 'adaptive', setting the brush relief to 0, >and cranking the density. You'll also almost certainly want 'evenly >distributed' placement. In any case, be warned that some of these may >take quite a while to run at high resolution; you may want to play >around for a while on a few small sections of the image. Wow - the revision you created is beautiful! Honestly I don’t understand most of your explanation but the end product would be perfect! Bottom line - how large - realistically- could that be made and still look good? -- nickib (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] will not launchortcuts produced.
Win 10 tablet. tried many times to download and install. program installs but will not open, no shortcuts created. will not launch from program list. love gimp.took may years to learn and enjoy it. brian catanzaro, user. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] [OT] list bounces
James, you seem to be subscribed normally, I didn't see anything special, do things work again in the meantime? Regards, Mitch On Sat, 2018-08-04 at 10:16 -0700, James Moe wrote: > Hello, > I received a notice that am excessive number of messages were > bounced > and my membership has been suspended, and that I should confirm I > exist. > Looking into this I discovered this in our spam filter: > > 2018-08-03_07:39:31 07170-11809 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [TLS-out] > 209.132.180.187 to: > ji...@sohnen-moe.com [SMTP Error] 554 5.7.1 DNS Blacklisted by > safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net > > Oops. > ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
