Re: [Gimp-user] Forschungsprojekt zur Verbesserung von GIMP

2012-05-23 Thread Tobias Jakobs
Liebe Carolin,

dies ist eine englischsprachige Mailingliste, Ihr solltet also auch
eure Mail und die Umfrage in Englisch machen. Dies wäre nicht nur
netter gegenüber den meisten Lesen der Mailingliste, es würde die
Reichweite auch erheblich erhöhen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Tobias

2012/5/22 Carolin Hillmann carolin.hillm...@googlemail.com:
 Hallo Liebe Gimp-User,

 Wir repräsentieren ein Forschungsprojekt der Technischen Universität Berlin.
 In diesem Zusammenhang suchen wir NutzerInnen von professionellen
 Grafikprogrammen, die zu einem Interview über ihren diesbezüglichen
 Arbeitsalltag bereit wären.  Unser  Ziel ist die benutzerfreundlichere
 Gestaltung der GIMP-Oberfläche.

 Wer Lust hat uns dabei behilflich zu sein, den bitten wir den angehängten
 Fragebogen ausgefüllt an uns zurück zu schicken.

 Wir danken für euer Engagement!!!

 Mit freundlichem Gruß

 Carolin Hillmann
 Projektleitung

 --
 Carolin Hillmann
 0177 299 45 45


 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list
 gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] Gimp 2.8 + Brushes

2012-05-23 Thread Alex Stegmann
Hello, my name is Alex Stegmann, and I've been using Gimp for sometime now.
It's a fantastic program, but I thought the area where it lacked the most
was the brushes. It only came with a few basic brushes, and you often had
to download extra packs for that something extra. This in itself wasn't a
huge deal, although if you had brush sets more like those of PaintTool SAI
or MyPaint, that would be really great. Those program don't have as much as
Gimp, but they have some really great brushes, which makes them fun to draw
in.

My bigger concerns is adding your own brushes to Gimp via imported brush
packs. While you say you integrate all files, the brush manager is lacking.
If I wish to add a few brush packs to see what they do, the brush list
quickly becomes clogged. You can't seem to delete brushes without going
back into the brushes folder which you first put them in, and then delete
the files. This also means if you like a few brushes in a pack, but the
rest of it is useless to you, then you have to have everything, or nothing.

There is a lot to be desired in terms of the brushes, and I hope you can
improve these soon. I stand by Gimp, even though people often call it a
watered down version of Photoshop, but Gimp 2.8  has been a huge
disappointment for me.

On a final note, when choosing a new brush, especially for the animated
texture brushes you include, I think it would be useful if you
automatically went to the brushes native size. This saves time and energy,
especially if you are testing out new brushes. MyPaint has this feature,
and I have found it incredibly useful. This also means I can just click the
brush a second time to reset it to the default settings.

I would very much like to see Gimp become an essential piece of software on
every digital artists computer, but for now it seems to be trailing behind.
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Ppm 16bit handling

2012-05-23 Thread br...@buys.net.br

On 05/07/12 06:04, Simon Budig wrote:

br...@buys.net.br (br...@buys.net.br) wrote:

I noticed that when I open a 16bit ppm in GIMP 2.8, the file opens
without the 'gimp can't handle 16bit, it will loose data, etc...'
notification. But if I open a tiff version of the very same raw
file, the notification does pop up. My understanding is that current
GIMP 2.8 can't handle 16bit, regardless of file format. Is that
right?

Yes, these warning dialogs are generated by the file-format plugin and
it seems the ppm plugin just silently discards data.

Gimp 2.8 is limited to 8 bit per channel, but if you feel adventurous
you are invited to try the current git version of babl/gegl/gimp and
experiment with the new high-bit-depth support. This still is strictly
unstable and has an inconsistent UI in lots of places. It is fun though
:)

I hope this helps,
 Simon

Hi,
So after a bunch of package installing and compiling, I am successfully
running Gimp 2.9.1 from git, on debian wheezy.
The thing is, when I open a 16bit tiff, Gimp *still* pops up the can't 
handle 16bit,
information will be lost After opening the file I go to Image  
Precision  and change
to 16bit. But from what I understand, setting the file to 16bit *after* 
it was downed
from 16 to 8 doesn't help. Information was already discarded in the 
first conversion.
I don't understand: can't Gimp just open the file as it is, with no 
conversion whatsoever, since

support to 16bit is there?

Thanks much,


Bruno

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Ppm 16bit handling

2012-05-23 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 23:34 -0300, br...@buys.net.br wrote:

 I don't understand: can't Gimp just open the file as it is, with no 
 conversion whatsoever, since support to 16bit is there?

Yes - all it takes is programming, code to handle each format at higher
bit depths. Patches are generally welcomed...

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list