Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submodule: Fix submodule.name - .path typos

2014-03-28 Thread W. Trevor King
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 05:55:18PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
 I just noticed that the two patches Junio added to pu have a
 reworded commit message I'm perfectly happy with.

The revised wording works for me too.

Cheers,
Trevor

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submodule: Fix submodule.name - .path typos

2014-03-28 Thread Jens Lehmann
I just noticed that the two patches Junio added to pu have a reworded
commit message I'm perfectly happy with.

Thanks all.

Am 28.03.2014 03:06, schrieb W. Trevor King:
 On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:15:00AM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
 Am 27.03.2014 22:06, schrieb W. Trevor King:
 The transition from submodule.path.* to submodule.name.* happened
 in 73b0898d (Teach git submodule add the --name option, 2012-09-30),
 which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03.

 Nope, the distinction between path and name is way older (AFAIK it
 is there from day one). That was just the point in time where you
 could choose a different name without editing .gitmodules. And the
 fact that the name is initialized with the path confused a lot of
 people.
 
 Before 73b0898d, cmd_add used:
 
   git config -f .gitmodules submodule.$sm_path.path $sm_path
 
 and similar, so I used submodule.path.branch in my initial
 documentation of this patch (v5 of that series) [1].  By the final v8
 (which rebased onto the then-current master with 73b0898d), the
 surrounding calls were [2]:
 
   git config -f .gitmodules submodule.$sm_name.path $sm_path
 
 but I missed the update to name in my rebasing.  I suppose I could
 have used name instead of path in my initial v5 patch, but I was
 one of the folks confused by the old name == path behavior ;).
 
 This patch is against master, because 23d25e48 hasn't landed in maint
 yet.  If you want, I can split this into two patches, one against
 maint fixing the b9289227 typo and another against master fixing the
 23d25e48 typo.

 This fixes the only two usages of 'submodule.path.*' in the
 Documentation I can see in current master.
 
 Right.  However, this patch won't apply to the maint branch (where
 23d25e48 hasn't landed).  I'm just saying that we may want to split
 this patch in half and push the fix for b9289227 in a maintenance
 release.  On the other hand, we've survived since 2012 with the
 current docs, so *not* splitting this patch apart works for me too.
 
 Cheers,
 Trevor
 
 [1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/210763
 [2]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/211832
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH] Documentation/submodule: Fix submodule.name - .path typos

2014-03-27 Thread W. Trevor King
The transition from submodule.path.* to submodule.name.* happened
in 73b0898d (Teach git submodule add the --name option, 2012-09-30),
which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03.  The first
submodule.path.branch reference landed a short time later in
b9289227 (submodule add: If --branch is given, record it in
.gitmodules, 2012-12-19), and I was probably just not aware of
73b0898d.  The second submodule.path.branch reference landed in
23d25e48 (submodule: explicit local branch creation in module_clone,
2014-01-26), and is just a copy paste error.  This commit updates both
references to the current submodule.name.branch.

Reported-by: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us
---
This patch is against master, because 23d25e48 hasn't landed in maint
yet.  If you want, I can split this into two patches, one against
maint fixing the b9289227 typo and another against master fixing the
23d25e48 typo.

 Documentation/git-submodule.txt | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-submodule.txt b/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
index 46c1eeb..77588b0 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ update::
 +
 For updates that clone missing submodules, checkout-mode updates will
 create submodules with detached HEADs; all other modes will create
-submodules with a local branch named after `submodule.path.branch`.
+submodules with a local branch named after `submodule.name.branch`.
 +
 For updates that do not clone missing submodules, the submodule's HEAD
 is only touched when the remote reference does not match the
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ OPTIONS
 -b::
 --branch::
Branch of repository to add as submodule.
-   The name of the branch is recorded as `submodule.path.branch` in
+   The name of the branch is recorded as `submodule.name.branch` in
`.gitmodules` for `update --remote`.
 
 -f::
-- 
1.9.1.352.gd393d14.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submodule: Fix submodule.name - .path typos

2014-03-27 Thread Jens Lehmann
Am 27.03.2014 22:06, schrieb W. Trevor King:
 The transition from submodule.path.* to submodule.name.* happened
 in 73b0898d (Teach git submodule add the --name option, 2012-09-30),
 which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03.

Nope, the distinction between path and name is way older (AFAIK it
is there from day one). That was just the point in time where you
could choose a different name without editing .gitmodules. And the
fact that the name is initialized with the path confused a lot of
people.

  The first
 submodule.path.branch reference landed a short time later in
 b9289227 (submodule add: If --branch is given, record it in
 .gitmodules, 2012-12-19), and I was probably just not aware of
 73b0898d.  The second submodule.path.branch reference landed in
 23d25e48 (submodule: explicit local branch creation in module_clone,
 2014-01-26), and is just a copy paste error.  This commit updates both
 references to the current submodule.name.branch.
 
 Reported-by: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us
 ---
 This patch is against master, because 23d25e48 hasn't landed in maint
 yet.  If you want, I can split this into two patches, one against
 maint fixing the b9289227 typo and another against master fixing the
 23d25e48 typo.

This fixes the only two usages of 'submodule.path.*' in the
Documentation I can see in current master.

  Documentation/git-submodule.txt | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/Documentation/git-submodule.txt b/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
 index 46c1eeb..77588b0 100644
 --- a/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
 +++ b/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
 @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ update::
  +
  For updates that clone missing submodules, checkout-mode updates will
  create submodules with detached HEADs; all other modes will create
 -submodules with a local branch named after `submodule.path.branch`.
 +submodules with a local branch named after `submodule.name.branch`.
  +
  For updates that do not clone missing submodules, the submodule's HEAD
  is only touched when the remote reference does not match the
 @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ OPTIONS
  -b::
  --branch::
   Branch of repository to add as submodule.
 - The name of the branch is recorded as `submodule.path.branch` in
 + The name of the branch is recorded as `submodule.name.branch` in
   `.gitmodules` for `update --remote`.
  
  -f::
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submodule: Fix submodule.name - .path typos

2014-03-27 Thread W. Trevor King
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:15:00AM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
 Am 27.03.2014 22:06, schrieb W. Trevor King:
  The transition from submodule.path.* to submodule.name.* happened
  in 73b0898d (Teach git submodule add the --name option, 2012-09-30),
  which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03.
 
 Nope, the distinction between path and name is way older (AFAIK it
 is there from day one). That was just the point in time where you
 could choose a different name without editing .gitmodules. And the
 fact that the name is initialized with the path confused a lot of
 people.

Before 73b0898d, cmd_add used:

  git config -f .gitmodules submodule.$sm_path.path $sm_path

and similar, so I used submodule.path.branch in my initial
documentation of this patch (v5 of that series) [1].  By the final v8
(which rebased onto the then-current master with 73b0898d), the
surrounding calls were [2]:

  git config -f .gitmodules submodule.$sm_name.path $sm_path

but I missed the update to name in my rebasing.  I suppose I could
have used name instead of path in my initial v5 patch, but I was
one of the folks confused by the old name == path behavior ;).

  This patch is against master, because 23d25e48 hasn't landed in maint
  yet.  If you want, I can split this into two patches, one against
  maint fixing the b9289227 typo and another against master fixing the
  23d25e48 typo.
 
 This fixes the only two usages of 'submodule.path.*' in the
 Documentation I can see in current master.

Right.  However, this patch won't apply to the maint branch (where
23d25e48 hasn't landed).  I'm just saying that we may want to split
this patch in half and push the fix for b9289227 in a maintenance
release.  On the other hand, we've survived since 2012 with the
current docs, so *not* splitting this patch apart works for me too.

Cheers,
Trevor

[1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/210763
[2]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/211832

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature