Re: [PATCH 1/2] ls-remote: do not send ref prefixes for patterns

2018-11-08 Thread Jonathan Tan
> Jeff King  writes:
> 
> > Since b4be74105f (ls-remote: pass ref prefixes when requesting a
> > remote's refs, 2018-03-15), "ls-remote foo" will pass "refs/heads/foo",
> > "refs/tags/foo", etc to the transport code in an attempt to let the
> > other side reduce the size of its advertisement.
> 
> Jonathan, seeing 2b554353 ("fetch: send "refs/tags/" prefix upon CLI
> refspecs", 2018-06-05), I am guessing that you are doing the proto v2
> work inherited from Brandon?

Sorry for the late reply - I had some personal events, but I should be
able to look more at Git stuff from now on.

Well, it's true that I have been fixing some bugs related to protocol
v2.

> Having to undo this is unfortunate, but
> I agree with this patch that we need to do this until ref prefix learns
> to grok wildcards.

It is unfortunate, although as far as I can tell, the performance
improvements from "git fetch" (which I think is the more frequent
command called) remain, so it might not be so bad. I see from your
What's Cooking that these patches are to be merged to master, which I
agree with.


Re: [PATCH 1/2] ls-remote: do not send ref prefixes for patterns

2018-10-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King  writes:

> Since b4be74105f (ls-remote: pass ref prefixes when requesting a
> remote's refs, 2018-03-15), "ls-remote foo" will pass "refs/heads/foo",
> "refs/tags/foo", etc to the transport code in an attempt to let the
> other side reduce the size of its advertisement.

Jonathan, seeing 2b554353 ("fetch: send "refs/tags/" prefix upon CLI
refspecs", 2018-06-05), I am guessing that you are doing the proto v2
work inherited from Brandon?  Having to undo this is unfortunate, but
I agree with this patch that we need to do this until ref prefix learns
to grok wildcards.

> Unfortunately this is not correct, as ls-remote patterns do not follow
> the usual ref lookup rules, and are in fact tail-matched. So we could
> find "refs/heads/foo" or "refs/heads/a/much/deeper/foo" or even
> "refs/another/hierarchy/foo".
>
> Since we can't pass a prefix and there's not yet a v2 extension for
> matching wildcards, we must disable this feature to keep the same
> behavior as v1.
>
> Reported-by: Jon Simons 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King 
> ---
>  builtin/ls-remote.c  | 8 
>  t/t5512-ls-remote.sh | 9 +
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/ls-remote.c b/builtin/ls-remote.c
> index 6a0cdec30d..5faa8459d9 100644
> --- a/builtin/ls-remote.c
> +++ b/builtin/ls-remote.c
> @@ -88,15 +88,7 @@ int cmd_ls_remote(int argc, const char **argv, const char 
> *prefix)
>   int i;
>   pattern = xcalloc(argc, sizeof(const char *));
>   for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
> - const char *glob;
>   pattern[i - 1] = xstrfmt("*/%s", argv[i]);
> -
> - glob = strchr(argv[i], '*');
> - if (glob)
> - argv_array_pushf(_prefixes, "%.*s",
> -  (int)(glob - argv[i]), 
> argv[i]);
> - else
> - expand_ref_prefix(_prefixes, argv[i]);
>   }
>   }
>  
> diff --git a/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh b/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh
> index bc5703ff9b..ca1b7e5bc1 100755
> --- a/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh
> +++ b/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh
> @@ -302,4 +302,13 @@ test_expect_success 'ls-remote works outside repository' 
> '
>   nongit git ls-remote dst.git
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success 'ls-remote patterns work with all protocol versions' '
> + git for-each-ref --format="%(objectname)%(refname)" \
> + refs/heads/master refs/remotes/origin/master >expect &&
> + git -c protocol.version=1 ls-remote . master >actual.v1 &&
> + test_cmp expect actual.v1 &&
> + git -c protocol.version=2 ls-remote . master >actual.v2 &&
> + test_cmp expect actual.v2
> +'
> +
>  test_done


[PATCH 1/2] ls-remote: do not send ref prefixes for patterns

2018-10-30 Thread Jeff King
Since b4be74105f (ls-remote: pass ref prefixes when requesting a
remote's refs, 2018-03-15), "ls-remote foo" will pass "refs/heads/foo",
"refs/tags/foo", etc to the transport code in an attempt to let the
other side reduce the size of its advertisement.

Unfortunately this is not correct, as ls-remote patterns do not follow
the usual ref lookup rules, and are in fact tail-matched. So we could
find "refs/heads/foo" or "refs/heads/a/much/deeper/foo" or even
"refs/another/hierarchy/foo".

Since we can't pass a prefix and there's not yet a v2 extension for
matching wildcards, we must disable this feature to keep the same
behavior as v1.

Reported-by: Jon Simons 
Signed-off-by: Jeff King 
---
 builtin/ls-remote.c  | 8 
 t/t5512-ls-remote.sh | 9 +
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/ls-remote.c b/builtin/ls-remote.c
index 6a0cdec30d..5faa8459d9 100644
--- a/builtin/ls-remote.c
+++ b/builtin/ls-remote.c
@@ -88,15 +88,7 @@ int cmd_ls_remote(int argc, const char **argv, const char 
*prefix)
int i;
pattern = xcalloc(argc, sizeof(const char *));
for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
-   const char *glob;
pattern[i - 1] = xstrfmt("*/%s", argv[i]);
-
-   glob = strchr(argv[i], '*');
-   if (glob)
-   argv_array_pushf(_prefixes, "%.*s",
-(int)(glob - argv[i]), 
argv[i]);
-   else
-   expand_ref_prefix(_prefixes, argv[i]);
}
}
 
diff --git a/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh b/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh
index bc5703ff9b..ca1b7e5bc1 100755
--- a/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh
+++ b/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh
@@ -302,4 +302,13 @@ test_expect_success 'ls-remote works outside repository' '
nongit git ls-remote dst.git
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'ls-remote patterns work with all protocol versions' '
+   git for-each-ref --format="%(objectname)%(refname)" \
+   refs/heads/master refs/remotes/origin/master >expect &&
+   git -c protocol.version=1 ls-remote . master >actual.v1 &&
+   test_cmp expect actual.v1 &&
+   git -c protocol.version=2 ls-remote . master >actual.v2 &&
+   test_cmp expect actual.v2
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
2.19.1.1298.g19f18f2a22