Thomas Gummerer writes:
> On 10/10, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
>> From: Johannes Schindelin
>>
>> The original phrasing of this paragraph made at least one person stumble
>> over the word "from" (thinking that it was a typo and "from" was
>> intended), and other readers chimed in, agreeing that it was confusing:
>> https://public-inbox.org/git/0102016b8d597569-c1f6cfdc-cb45-4428-8737-cb1bc30655d8-000...@eu-west-1.amazonses.com/#t
>>
>> Let's rewrite that paragraph for clarity.
>>
>> Inspired-by-a-patch-by: Catalin Criste
>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
>
> Thanks for picking this thread up again, I had already forgotten about
> it. The updated wording sounds like an improvement to me.
To me too. I would have just done s/form/become/ out of laziness
and aiming for conciseness, but the new and separate sentence is
good, too.
Thanks, both.
>
>> ---
>> Documentation/git-stash.txt | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/git-stash.txt b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
>> index 8fbe12c66c..53e1a1205d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/git-stash.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
>> @@ -87,8 +87,9 @@ The `--patch` option implies `--keep-index`. You can use
>> save [-p|--patch] [-k|--[no-]keep-index] [-u|--include-untracked]
>> [-a|--all] [-q|--quiet] []::
>>
>> This option is deprecated in favour of 'git stash push'. It
>> -differs from "stash push" in that it cannot take pathspecs,
>> -and any non-option arguments form the message.
>> +differs from "stash push" in that it cannot take pathspecs.
>> +Instead, all non-option arguments are concatenated to form the stash
>> +message.
>>
>> list []::
>>
>> --
>> gitgitgadget
