Re: jc/rebase-in-c-9-fixes, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2018, #01; Tue, 4)
Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * jc/rebase-in-c-9-fixes (2018-09-04) 1 commit >> - rebase: re-add forgotten -k that stands for --keep-empty >> (this branch uses ag/rebase-i-in-c, >> js/rebase-in-c-5.5-work-with-rebase-i-in-c, pk/rebase-in-c, >> pk/rebase-in-c-2-basic, pk/rebase-in-c-3-acts, pk/rebase-in-c-4-opts, >> pk/rebase-in-c-5-test and pk/rebase-in-c-6-final.) > > Quite frankly, I'd rather you pick up my two v2 series. I promised to take > over from Pratik, who is busy with exams, and I did. I even announced as > much in that mail where I pointed out the missing short option originally. Yup, I'm planning to replace the large pile of patches with the new ones you'd send once the final is done. The topic above is just a stop-gap measure to keep the tip of 'pu' testable, to be dropped when the series it fixes is replaced with a corrected one.
jc/rebase-in-c-9-fixes, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2018, #01; Tue, 4)
Hi Junio, On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * jc/rebase-in-c-9-fixes (2018-09-04) 1 commit > - rebase: re-add forgotten -k that stands for --keep-empty > (this branch uses ag/rebase-i-in-c, > js/rebase-in-c-5.5-work-with-rebase-i-in-c, pk/rebase-in-c, > pk/rebase-in-c-2-basic, pk/rebase-in-c-3-acts, pk/rebase-in-c-4-opts, > pk/rebase-in-c-5-test and pk/rebase-in-c-6-final.) Quite frankly, I'd rather you pick up my two v2 series. I promised to take over from Pratik, who is busy with exams, and I did. I even announced as much in that mail where I pointed out the missing short option originally. So there is no need to do add-on patches, as if the `rebase-in-c` patch series had already been accepted into `next`. Ciao, Dscho
