Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] Specifying that the latest Windows release only works for 64bit systems (#36)
Thanks (I actually had prepared another pull request for this, but you reacted fast!) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/issues/36#issuecomment-939610425
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] update geany.org/support/verify-gpg-signature/ (#37)
nice! that was my first pull request :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37#issuecomment-939610068
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update to Scintilla5 (#2867)
> middle click paste in the editor widget doesn't work anymore (on Linux) Works for external selections, ie in other apps. Looks vaguely like right click might be moving the caret (and so removing the selection) before it queries the selection to paste. Probably should be raised as a Scintilla issue, but I no longer have a Sourceforge account since it won't let me reset my password after a password reset went wrong. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2867#issuecomment-939608686
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Option to hide the fold margin but keep folding (#2927)
I am not sure that being able to turn off folding is a good idea, IIUC parts of symbols handling uses it to locate the current block/function/construct. There may be other places its used as its the only part of Geany that provides structure information. Havn't looked at the changes but IRO your questions: > Should I make a different PR for this? (asusming it even is desired!) Sounds like its sensible to be part of the change. > Also, should I or would you suggest that I also modify the manual to document > the additions? Of course. > Should I add something about the new UI options in the language/translation > files? IIUC should happen automatically if the strings are marked for translation. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2927#issuecomment-939576276
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany-plugins] Update GeanyLua for Scintilla 5 (#1118)
Not surprising really. Scintilla has jumped two major versions, so its API has changed (twice) incompatibly. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/issues/1118#issuecomment-939574584
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update to Scintilla5 (#2867)
> it seems we do not install include/geany/scintilla/SciLexer.h any longer. I > guess this is not on purpose? Ahhh, all my (and I guess @kugel-) testing was done by applying changes to an existing build so we already had `SciLexer.h` installed. Indeed on a fresh clone it is not installed, just needs somebody with autotools knowledge to add it to the list. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2867#issuecomment-939574215
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Switch to Python 3 for GTK doc header generation (#2903)
Yay, good thought. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2903#issuecomment-939569755
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] cannot install on windows 7, 32bit (#2923)
Maintaining a Win32 version should be possible, all necessary changes can be found in #2590 (and need to be reversed more or less). I personally doubt if it is worth the efforts. This is why we switched to x86_64 (after some discussion about the switch in #2590). Providing the Windows installers is already an extra effort on creating releases and is time consuming. Then providing even multiple variants is even more work. But yes, if there are actually more users who have to use Win32, your approach might be feasible. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2923#issuecomment-939566857
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] Specifying that the latest Windows release only works for 64bit systems (#36)
Closed #36 via 9a01f79f64b67d2f84bf7412cefaf7df674c24be. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/issues/36#event-5439964703
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] update geany.org/support/verify-gpg-signature/ (#37)
Merged #37 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37#event-5439925295
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] how to verify GPG signatures on Windows (#34)
Closed #34 via #37. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/issues/34#event-5439925299
[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Option to hide the fold margin but keep folding (#2927)
Hi, Ive made changes that allow for keeping the fold margin non-visible, but still be able to fold code (eg. via the shortcuts). UI Additions: - Show fold margin in Preferences Editor Display. - Show fold margin in the View menu. If code folding is disabled: - The 1st UI addition becomes greyed out, similarly to Fold/unfold all children of a fold point - The 2nd UI addition disappears, similarly to Fold/Unfold All in the Document menu. Furthermore, if the code folding option is disabled and it becomes enabled, Show fold margin is automatically enabled. The rationale is to avoid confusing someone that enabled folding, but is not seeing any fold margin. Finally, in the 2nd commit, which is actually not directly related to the above additions, Ive added some logic to automatically unfold all code when switching off folding. Without it, already folded code will remain in the folded state with no option to unfold it without re-enabling the option. Should I make a different PR for this? (asusming it even is desired!) Also, should I or would you suggest that I also modify the manual to document the additions? Should I add something about the new UI options in the language/translation files? You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2927 -- Commit Summary -- * https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2927/commits/3493f32c921218ae8512537898e0ad46807f2941;>Add UI option to hide the fold margin, while keeping code folding * https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2927/commits/3ff536201efb74307c837f7585e0869be59d88fe;>Automatically unfold all code when folding is switched off in preferences -- File Changes -- M data/geany.glade (30) M src/callbacks.c (10) M src/editor.c (6) M src/editor.h (1) M src/keyfile.c (2) M src/prefs.c (17) M src/ui_utils.c (5) M src/ui_utils.h (1) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2927.patch https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2927.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2927
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] update geany.org/support/verify-gpg-signature/ (#37)
@VictorelPetrovich pushed 1 commit. f8197aff39b77395802c3f294ad42ced1264a405 fixed a typo -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37/files/22658e002d2179c49569c274e60c5d41a860f167..f8197aff39b77395802c3f294ad42ced1264a405
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] update geany.org/support/verify-gpg-signature/ (#37)
@VictorelPetrovich pushed 2 commits. 973432998978a283c1d7e8a50087768100b1821e Revert "specifies that Windows version is for 64bit and adds note for 32bit" 22658e002d2179c49569c274e60c5d41a860f167 Merge pull request #4 from VictorelPetrovich/revert-3-VictorelPetrovich-Releases-win32-note -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37/files/eca584f129d40628474e9debaa98167905c20cbb..22658e002d2179c49569c274e60c5d41a860f167
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] update geany.org/support/verify-gpg-signature/ (#37)
@VictorelPetrovich pushed 3 commits. 03ae6939aab7271ded76ee571081fca6e5782e85 Update releases.md ba550e46145514f633b9af4e8c1b44a1269558fa specified that the Windows version is for 64bit and added note for 32 bit below eca584f129d40628474e9debaa98167905c20cbb Merge pull request #3 from VictorelPetrovich/VictorelPetrovich-Releases-win32-note -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37/files/e16cffc649b11da3fd299ca08017e9d6b702e3c2..eca584f129d40628474e9debaa98167905c20cbb
[Github-comments] [geany/geany] AppImages available (Discussion #2926)
Unofficial Geany AppImages maintained by @ecmu can be obtained from https://github.com/ecmu/geany.AppImage They are based on official Geany source code ;) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/discussions/2926
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] update geany.org/support/verify-gpg-signature/ (#37)
I have applied the changed discussed in this PR #35 (which I had closed by accident) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37#issuecomment-939533730
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Feature request: Please provide an AppImage for Geany (#1303)
I see @ecmu just released [an updated Appimage for Geany 1.38.0](https://github.com/ecmu/geany.AppImage/releases/tag/1.38.0) Seems like it shouldn't be too difficult to merge that repo setup with Geany's official repo, so the AppImage would be more visible and available, etc. @eht16 @b4n -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1303#issuecomment-939533600
[Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] update https://www.geany.org/support/verify-gpg-signature/ (#37)
Added 2 lines at the top to explain users how to get gpg, of particular use for non-Linux users. Fixes #34 You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37 -- Commit Summary -- * https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37/commits/4ae61fee143c8878caeb0b4341548ff3a8c9f57c;>Update verify-gpg-signature.md * https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37/commits/e16cffc649b11da3fd299ca08017e9d6b702e3c2;>Update verify-gpg-signature.md -- File Changes -- M page_content/support/verify-gpg-signature.md (4) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37.patch https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/37
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] Update verify-gpg-signature.md (#35)
Oops... I wanted to rename the branch, and I didn't know it would automatically close this pull request! I'm goint to make another one, from the renamed branch. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/35#issuecomment-939532160
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] Update verify-gpg-signature.md (#35)
Closed #35. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/35#event-5439715195
[Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] Specifying that the latest Windows release only works for 64bit systems (#36)
According to https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2923, latest and future Windows versions will only work for 64 bit. So then https://www.geany.org/download/releases/ should mention that one way or another. Perhaps replacing in the table "Windows" with "Windows 64bit [^1] " and adding a footnote below the table : [^1]: For Windows 32bit, you can get version 1.37.1 or older, see Older versions section below. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/issues/36
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] cannot install on windows 7, 32bit (#2923)
I guess that means a version for Win32 will no longer be maintained? Or maybe there is a sufficient minority of people like me, with obsolete hardware :), that could fork and maintain a version for Windows 32 bit, even if much behind the one for Windows64bit in terms of features? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2923#issuecomment-939513783
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] cannot install on windows 7, 32bit (#2923)
Reopened #2923. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2923#event-5439591853
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] Update verify-gpg-signature.md (#35)
@VictorelPetrovich commented on this pull request. > @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ Verifying GPG signatures of Geany and Geany-Plugins releases == +You can use the `gpg` utility. On GNU/Linux distributions, if you don't have it, you can get it with `sudo apt install gpg`. On other OS-es, see https://gnupg.org/download/index.html and https://gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.html. + +Here is how to use `gpg` on Linux and related: Thanks, I think both are good ideas. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/35#discussion_r725663353
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] Update verify-gpg-signature.md (#35)
@VictorelPetrovich pushed 1 commit. e16cffc649b11da3fd299ca08017e9d6b702e3c2 Update verify-gpg-signature.md -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/35/files/4ae61fee143c8878caeb0b4341548ff3a8c9f57c..e16cffc649b11da3fd299ca08017e9d6b702e3c2
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Switch to Python 3 for GTK doc header generation (#2903)
@b4n and me were wondering whether the generated header file will be different from Python2 to Python3 while releasing 1.38. So I gave it a try: - For Python 3 (tested in a container, started like this: `docker run --rm -it -v /tmp/shared:/shared debian:buster-slim`): ``` apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends git doxygen intltool libtool libgtk-3-dev python3-lxml python3-docutils rst2pdf build-essential git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/geany/geany /geany-test && cd /geany-test PYTHON=python3 ./autogen.sh --enable-api-docs --enable-gtkdoc-header make -C doc cp doc/geany-gtkdoc.h /shared/geany-gtkdoc-py3.h ``` - For Python 2 (tested in a container, started like this: `docker run --rm -it -v /tmp/shared:/shared debian:buster-slim`): ``` apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends git doxygen intltool libtool libgtk-3-dev python-lxml python-docutils rst2pdf build-essential git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/geany/geany /geany-test && cd /geany-test PYTHON=python2 ./autogen.sh --enable-api-docs --enable-gtkdoc-header make -C doc cp doc/geany-gtkdoc.h /shared/geany-gtkdoc-py2.h ``` The resulting files are identical. Yay. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2903#issuecomment-939497331
[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Generate Python identifiers only for Python 3 (#2924)
Python 2 is EOL since almost two years now, so remove Python2 keywords and simplify the script to generate them. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2924 -- Commit Summary -- * https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2924/commits/b90059829a90087950ee98220a6caceb690cab89;>Fix target filename for updating Python identifiers in filetype definition * https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2924/commits/36f7511173c251db14615a17af464cd63a75e98d;>Generate Python identifiers only for Python 3 -- File Changes -- M data/filedefs/filetypes.python.in (8) M scripts/update-python-identifiers.sh (16) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2924.patch https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2924.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2924
[Github-comments] [geany/geany-plugins] Update GeanyLua for Scintilla 5 (#1118)
After https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2867 has been merged, the GeanyLua
plugin needs to be updated to work with the new Scintilla version.
Currently, compilation fails as follow:
```
make: Entering directory '/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua'
Making all in docs
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/docs'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/docs'
Making all in examples
make[1]: Entering directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples'
Making all in dialogs
make[2]: Entering directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples/dialogs'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples/dialogs'
Making all in edit
make[2]: Entering directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples/edit'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples/edit'
Making all in info
make[2]: Entering directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples/info'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples/info'
Making all in scripting
make[2]: Entering directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples/scripting'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples/scripting'
Making all in work
make[2]: Entering directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples/work'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples/work'
make[2]: Entering directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'.
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples'
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua/examples'
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua'
CC libgeanylua_la-glspi_sci.lo
CC geanylua_la-geanylua.lo
In file included from glspi_sci.c:11:
glspi_sci.h:369:39: error: ‘SCI_GETTWOPHASEDRAW’ undeclared here (not in a
function); did you mean ‘SCI_GETPHASESDRAW’?
369 | {"GETTWOPHASEDRAW", SLT_BOOL, SCI_GETTWOPHASEDRAW, SLT_VOID,
SLT_VOID},
| ^~~
| SCI_GETPHASESDRAW
CCLD geanylua.la
glspi_sci.h:370:39: error: ‘SCI_SETTWOPHASEDRAW’ undeclared here (not in a
function); did you mean ‘SCI_SETPHASESDRAW’?
370 | {"SETTWOPHASEDRAW", SLT_VOID, SCI_SETTWOPHASEDRAW, SLT_BOOL,
SLT_VOID},
| ^~~
| SCI_SETPHASESDRAW
glspi_sci.h:711:32: error: ‘SCI_SETLEXER’ undeclared here (not in a function);
did you mean ‘SCI_SETILEXER’?
711 | {"SETLEXER", SLT_VOID, SCI_SETLEXER, SLT_INT, SLT_VOID},
|^~~~
|SCI_SETILEXER
glspi_sci.h:716:40: error: ‘SCI_SETLEXERLANGUAGE’ undeclared here (not in a
function); did you mean ‘SCI_GETLEXERLANGUAGE’?
716 | {"SETLEXERLANGUAGE", SLT_VOID, SCI_SETLEXERLANGUAGE, SLT_VOID,
SLT_STRING},
|^~~~
|SCI_GETLEXERLANGUAGE
glspi_sci.h:717:40: error: ‘SCI_LOADLEXERLIBRARY’ undeclared here (not in a
function)
717 | {"LOADLEXERLIBRARY", SLT_VOID, SCI_LOADLEXERLIBRARY, SLT_VOID,
SLT_STRING},
|^~~~
make[1]: *** [Makefile:862: libgeanylua_la-glspi_sci.lo] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua'
make: *** [Makefile:916: all-recursive] Error 1
make: Leaving directory '/home/enrico/projects/geany-plugins/geanylua'
``
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/issues/1118
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Add AutoIt syntax highlighting and Ctags parser for AutoIt (#1752)
@Skif-off pushed 1 commit. 3c31a6e4f1c8e6c412bf58e94921fa3dad24c495 UPD: new Scintilla 2 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1752/files/7bc8d8a6674f7a38c7cea5c085da98647138d58f..3c31a6e4f1c8e6c412bf58e94921fa3dad24c495
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Update to Scintilla5 (#2867)
Yay for early merge! @kugel- I noticed to issues now that it is merged (which is good): - the plugins fail to build (https://www.geany.org/p/KquBW/raw/) - maybe it's the plugin's fault or maybe not. We should at least check if the changed behavior is desired. - middle click paste in the editor widget doesn't work anymore (on Linux) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2867#issuecomment-939472661
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Add AutoIt syntax highlighting and Ctags parser for AutoIt (#1752)
@Skif-off pushed 1 commit. 7bc8d8a6674f7a38c7cea5c085da98647138d58f UPD: new Scintilla -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1752/files/deead83fff41846c5862f6182b17d04de261c0d6..7bc8d8a6674f7a38c7cea5c085da98647138d58f
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] Update verify-gpg-signature.md (#35)
@eht16 requested changes on this pull request. Great, thank you. I have only two minor remarks. > @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ Verifying GPG signatures of Geany and Geany-Plugins releases == +You can use the `gpg` utility. On GNU/Linux distributions, if you don't have it, you can get it with `sudo apt install gpg`. On other OS-es, see https://gnupg.org/download/index.html and https://gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.html. Would mind using "on other operating systems, ...". I think we don't need to abbreviate here so much. > @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ Verifying GPG signatures of Geany and Geany-Plugins releases == +You can use the `gpg` utility. On GNU/Linux distributions, if you don't have it, you can get it with `sudo apt install gpg`. On other OS-es, see https://gnupg.org/download/index.html and https://gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.html. + +Here is how to use `gpg` on Linux and related: What do you think about making this a sub heading, like: `### Here is how to use `gpg` on Linux and related ` so it also structures the document a bit more. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/35#pullrequestreview-775664036
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Add AutoIt syntax highlighting and Ctags parser for AutoIt (#1752)
@Skif-off pushed 1 commit. d82a3abe88ca08fa8f806c032ffd9b5e5169660b TMP -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1752/files/1de996fe9cdf8df609aaf7f70de75662b40a1f98..d82a3abe88ca08fa8f806c032ffd9b5e5169660b
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Add AutoIt syntax highlighting and Ctags parser for AutoIt (#1752)
@Skif-off pushed 1 commit. a752cb8f67651fee1f410a40267f9aad7fdd8ab1 UPD: simple.au3.tags -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1752/files/44bd43d8df82d87eabe2efe461b85a4c13ebf1b1..a752cb8f67651fee1f410a40267f9aad7fdd8ab1
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Can't see underscores on Ubuntu 20.04 (#2502)
The bug is fixed in Scintilla 5.1.2: > On GTK, fix the line spacing so that underscores and accents are visible for > some fonts such as DejaVu Sans Mono 10. https://www.scintilla.org/ScintillaHistory.html No Ubuntu release seem to have a version of libqscintilla* near that great. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2502#issuecomment-939463462
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] Folding code: more advanced commands (#2920)
> Btw looks like "Toggle current fold" use that "Fold/unfold all children of a > fold point" configuration too. Right; except the Shift switch doesn't work to change the behavior of the Toggle current command. So then your (un)fold recursive is almost the same as what I got to in C3/C4. With just one difference: to apply to descendants (= to children, recursively) only, not to parent node. Here's why it may be better: when you come to a parent node: 1. if it's initially closed, your first action will probably be just to toggle it open. You wouldn't want to open it and its children recursively, as that will reveal too much infor at once. 2. Now once you opened it, if children happen to be closed, that's fine, you can select one of them to explore (in particular with CO1/CO2 if want). If you really want to pop them all open at once, then the Unfold All descendants I suggest still does the job. But if all/most chilren are already opened (let alone if their descendants too), you'll want to close them (too much info at once!). So here the Fold All Descendants will come in very handy: will fold the children of children, but you'll still see curent (parent) and its children. 3. If instead the node is initially open... see 2. (This formulation also logically agrees with what (Un)Fold All does, if imagine that the ancestor node of all nodes in file is the file itself..) So we have 3 existing, + 4 new suggested. In addition, we could also include a command to open/unfold All nodes of Ist (top) level, and another to close/fold them - just b/c we're at it... Though I'm personally not convinced these fixed-level of all nodes are useful; or at least not useful beyond Ist level (b/c usually you dont' want to see too much at once, and you'll work in a local region anyway, where toggle current and/or (Un)Fold Descendants and CO1/CO2 will do a better job ). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2920#issuecomment-939412742
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] cannot install on windows 7, 32bit (#2923)
Closed #2923. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2923#event-5438871832
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] cannot install on windows 7, 32bit (#2923)
Okay, thanks for confirming. Yes, just tested 1.37.1, works just fine. Bye -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2923#issuecomment-939405343
Re: [Github-comments] [geany/geany] cannot install on windows 7, 32bit (#2923)
Nwews for 1.38 says "* Switch Windows builds to GTK3 and x86_64 (PR#2590)." so no, won't do 32 bit. Since the switch was at 1.38, probably 1.37.1 will still work on 32 bit. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2923#issuecomment-939402572
[Github-comments] [geany/geany] cannot install on windows 7, 32bit (#2923)
I just tried to install the latest version; Is Geany supposed to run on Windows x86 (32bit) ?  I searched the docs and all issues, I found PR #2590 , does that mean x86 is no longer supported? ... If so, what is the latest version that can still run on it? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2923
[Github-comments] [geany/www.geany.org] Update verify-gpg-signature.md (#35)
Added 2 lines at the top to explain users how to get `gpg`, of particular use for non-Linux users. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/35 -- Commit Summary -- * https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/35/commits/4ae61fee143c8878caeb0b4341548ff3a8c9f57c;>Update verify-gpg-signature.md -- File Changes -- M page_content/support/verify-gpg-signature.md (4) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/35.patch https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/35.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/35
