RE: Type Synonym where the kind is not *

1999-06-21 Thread Simon Marlow

 Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
  
  Thanks for reporting this.  I think we fixed already.  It's 
 certainly ok in
  the
  current CVS snapshot.
 
 When do you plan on releasing a new version of GHC with this bug fixed
 as I rely on it pretty heavily?

The sources are in pretty good shape right now.  Performance is
significantly improved over 4.02 due to RULES and wotnot, and a load of bugs
have been fixed.

We'll probably do a release fairly soon, but it'd be nice if this was a
"full binary release", which naturally takes a bit longer.  I think we'll
wind down development over the next couple of weeks, let things settle down
and then go into release mode.

Cheers,
Simon



RE: Type Synonym where the kind is not *

1999-06-18 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones

Thanks for reporting this.  I think we fixed already.  It's certainly ok in
the
current CVS snapshot.

Simon

 -Original Message-
 From: Kevin Atkinson 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 5:39 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Type Synonym where the kind is not *
 
 
 GHC version 4.02, patchlevel 0 does not allow type synonym where the
 kind is not *.  For example it does not allow
   type List = []
 which is given an example in section 4.2.2 of the Haskell 98 Report.
 
 The latest version of hugs doesn't have any problems with it
 
 -- 
 Kevin Atkinson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/
 



Re: Type Synonym where the kind is not *

1999-06-18 Thread Kevin Atkinson

Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
 
 Thanks for reporting this.  I think we fixed already.  It's certainly ok in
 the
 current CVS snapshot.

When do you plan on releasing a new version of GHC with this bug fixed
as I rely on it pretty heavily?
 
 Simon
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Kevin Atkinson
  Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 5:39 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Type Synonym where the kind is not *
 
 
  GHC version 4.02, patchlevel 0 does not allow type synonym where the
  kind is not *.  For example it does not allow
type List = []
  which is given an example in section 4.2.2 of the Haskell 98 Report.
 
  The latest version of hugs doesn't have any problems with it
 
  --
  Kevin Atkinson
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/
 

-- 
Kevin Atkinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/



Type Synonym where the kind is not *

1999-06-16 Thread Kevin Atkinson

GHC version 4.02, patchlevel 0 does not allow type synonym where the
kind is not *.  For example it does not allow
  type List = []
which is given an example in section 4.2.2 of the Haskell 98 Report.

The latest version of hugs doesn't have any problems with it

-- 
Kevin Atkinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/