ANNOUNCE: GHC porting works again
Hi all, The instructions for porting GHC to a new architecture now work again with the HEAD: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Porting If you get stuck when trying to do a port, then please feel free to ask us on cvs-...@haskell.org or in #ghc on freenode. Thanks Ian ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Should exhaustiveness testing be on by default?
JHC has had this for a while, but it calls the pragma 'SRCLOC_ANNOTATE'. It is actually mentioned on this page: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ExplicitCallStack I am not entirely sure whether I will keep the current syntax (it doesn't really make sense for operators), but if ghc implements something related, then it would be good to be compatible. John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ - http://notanumber.net/ ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Mac OS X 64bit unregisterised port
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 05:50:00PM -0500, austin s wrote: With this unregistered port you've made available, we should be well on our way to doing this, correct? Right, by starting from that bindist you won't have to do the bootstrapping. Now you just need to do a registerised build and fix any problems / fill in any missing bits. (if so, I would like to start working on a registered x86_64 port.) Great! As you probably already know, pumpkin on IRC is also interested in this. Thanks Ian ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
