Re: Associativity of ViewPatterns
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.com wrote: Good point. I'll fix that, in HEAD at least. Thanks, BTW did you fix the infix instance headers problem in HEAD I previously mailed about? regards, Bas ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
RE: Associativity of ViewPatterns
Yes I did. That too was an oversight. Thanks for pointing both out. S | -Original Message- | From: Bas van Dijk [mailto:v.dijk@gmail.com] | Sent: 07 January 2010 08:44 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Associativity of ViewPatterns | | On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones | simo...@microsoft.com wrote: | Good point. I'll fix that, in HEAD at least. | | Thanks, | | BTW did you fix the infix instance headers problem in HEAD I | previously mailed about? | | regards, | | Bas ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Associativity of ViewPatterns
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.com wrote: Yes I did. That too was an oversight. Thanks for pointing both out. Ok thanks (I asked just to make sure I don't have to create a ticket.) Bas ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
haddock source link are wrong for haskell98 modules
Hi, is this a known issue? All source links in haskell98 modules are dead I.e. in http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/haskell98-1.0.1.1/Array.html The link under the first Source (at the right margin) points to http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/haskell98-1.0.1.1/src/GHC-Arr.html#Array which does not exist. Can this be fixed easily? Cheers Christian ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: haddock source link are wrong for haskell98 modules
The link to Data.Time http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/Data-Time.html in System.Time http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/System-Time.html is also dead. There seems to be a problem with inter-package links. C. Christian Maeder schrieb: Hi, is this a known issue? All source links in haskell98 modules are dead I.e. in http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/haskell98-1.0.1.1/Array.html The link under the first Source (at the right margin) points to http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/haskell98-1.0.1.1/src/GHC-Arr.html#Array which does not exist. Can this be fixed easily? Cheers Christian ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Poll: Error message spans
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:01:46PM -0800, Alexander Dunlap wrote: On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote: Would you find the extra information useful, or just noise? i.e. should we show error spans by default? I certainly wouldn't find it distracting, and I think it could be quite useful in many cases. I vote for turning it on by default. I agree. -Brent ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: haddock source link are wrong for haskell98 modules
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 01:13:49PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote: The link to Data.Time http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/Data-Time.html in System.Time http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/old-time-1.0.0.3/System-Time.html is also dead. Christian Maeder schrieb: Hi, is this a known issue? All source links in haskell98 modules are dead I.e. in http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/haskell98-1.0.1.1/Array.html The link under the first Source (at the right margin) points to http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/haskell98-1.0.1.1/src/GHC-Arr.html#Array which does not exist. Thanks for the report; I've filed a ticket for these: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3810 Thanks Ian ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Poll: Error message spans
Would you find the extra information useful, or just noise? i.e. should we show error spans by default? I certainly wouldn't find it distracting, and I think it could be quite useful in many cases. I vote for turning it on by default. I agree. +1. It is a feature I have always found useful in other tools. (Although ghc does usually quote the entire literal source expression denoted by the span, so perhaps the info is slightly redundant.) Regards, Malcolm ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
