Re: runghc and GhcWithInterpreter

2015-04-07 Thread Reid Barton
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Jeremy  wrote:

> Edward Z. Yang wrote
> > runghc itself is just a little shell script which calls GHC proper
> > with the -f flag, so I suppose the build system was just not set
> > up to not create this link in that case.
>
> I have a binary called runghc under /usr/local/lib/ghc-7.10.1/bin in
> addition to the shell script under /usr/local/bin that references it.
>

Yes, runghc is actually a small Haskell program that shells out to ghc -e.

I filed an issue:  https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10261

Regards,
Reid Barton
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Binary bloat in 7.10

2015-04-07 Thread Jeremy
Thomas Miedema wrote
> It was all due to a missing -split-objs in Jeremy's 7.8 build.

For the record, this appears to have been a bug in the 7.8 build system, as
SplitObjs is supposed to be on by default. I only noticed when building
7.10, where the default was correct, and didn't understand why the GHC
libraries has ballooned.



--
View this message in context: 
http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Binary-bloat-in-7-10-tp5768067p5768377.html
Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users