Re: OS X - Haskell to Objective-C Binding on GHC 6.6
Mathew, Would you be willing to send me a cvs diff as well? Thanks, -Rod On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:08 PM, Mathew Mills wrote: I just succeeded in building HOC from CVS HEAD against ghc-6.6 on x86 Mac OS X last night. I didn't encounter that specific problem, though. I can send you a cvs diff if that would help. On Oct 26, 2006, at 10:15 AM, Charlie Conklin wrote: Is anyone out there running OS X and using HOC and GHC 6.6? I took the latest from cvs and got some way toward getting it to compile by changing the code to: 1. reflect changes regarding packages, i.e. adding -package-name to the pertinent makefiles, and accommodating the changed signature of Language.Haskell.TH.Syntax mkNameG_v and mkNameG_tc 2. replacing the obsolete names used from Data.Set which have been removed from GHC 6.6. At that point HOC was able to get to the point where it parses the ObjC headers, but it then choked on compiling the generated .hs files, some of which seem to have invalid constructions like: -- enum definitions $(declareAnonymousCEnum [(NSFileNoSuchFileError, 4), (NSFileLockingError, 255),(NSFileReadUnknownError, 256),(NSFileReadNoPermissionError, 257),(NSFileReadInvalidFileNameError, 25, (NSFileReadCorruptFileError, 259),(NSFileReadNoSuchFileError, 260),(NSFileReadInapplicableStringEncodingError, 261),(NSFileReadUnsupportedSchemeError, 262), (NSFileWriteUnknownError, 512),(NSFileWriteNoPermissionError, 513), (NSFileWriteInvalidFileNameError, 514),(NSFileWriteInapplicableStringEncodingError, 517),(NSFileWriteUnsupportedSchemeError, 51, (NSFileWriteOutOfSpaceError, 640),(NSKeyValueValidationError, 1024),(NSFormattingError, 204,(NSUserCancelledError, 3072),(NSFileErrorMinimum, 0),(NSFileErrorMaximum, 1023),(NSValidationErrorMinimum, 1024),(NSValidationErrorMaximum, 2047),(NSFormattingErrorMinimum, 204,(NSFormattingErrorMaximum, 2559)]) I'm a complete beginner to Hasell, and at this point I'm a bit stuck. Any help would be much appreciated! Cheers, - Charlie ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: ghc-6.6 mac intel binary bundle
Here's what worked for me: bunzip2 ghc-6.6-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2 tar -xvf ghc-6.6-i386-apple-darwin.tar cd ghc-6.6 ./configure sudo make show-install-setup sudo make install ghc --version The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 6.6 I'm on a MacBook Pro running OS X 10.4.8. The make show- install-setup step doesn't do anything but show you where the files will go when you do make install, but make install worked fine on my machine. -Rod On Oct 13, 2006, at 7:23 PM, Adam Megacz wrote: Hi, I'm grateful to whoever prepared the binary bundle for ghc-6.6 on MacOS/Intel, but the instructions for installing it are missing/wrong. In particular, make install doesn't do much, and the only binary in the bundle called ghc appears to need additional configuration options (-B), so it seems to need some sort of installation procedure. The INSTALL file is not useful. Overall, I'm kind of uncertain exactly what this tarball contains. It looks like a built copy of the source code, but most of the source code is missing. It's not an installer (.mpkg) nor does it (apparently) contain any install scripts. Could you perhaps update this webpage with an example of the shell commands you might use to get it installed to the point where typing ghc Foo.hs works? http://www.haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_66.html#macosxintel Thanks, - a -- PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770 B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380 ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: GHC on MacOS
Simon, I would like to help, but my time is limited and my knowledge of GHC internals is nearly non-existent. I am, however, very interested in seeing GHC run on Mac Intel. I particularly want to see the full STM mechanism, including check, running on the Mac. Are there small pieces of this problem that I could help with? -Rod On Oct 2, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Thorkil Naur wrote: Hello, Let me make that offer, then, that I would like to help investigate and fix GHC on MacOS. The obstacles that I have mentioned earlier are ones that I would eventually have removed in any case, so don't worry, I will not be wasting any time. Regards Thorkil On Monday 02 October 2006 09:31, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: Thanks -- in fact we've had a few helpful offers of access (which is v helpful). We may still yet take you up, but meanwhile don't do too much work. So far, no one has offered to help investigate/fix GHC on MacOS, so progress may be slow. We'd love to hear from keen MacOS users who are willing to roll their sleeves up! Simon ... ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: STM check operation
Thanks for your reply. I'm a bit confused, however. There is a function check :: Bool - STM a in the STM library, but it appears to act differently than the one described in the paper. This version of check seems to cause a transaction to block when its (check's) first argument is False, rather than issue an error or exception. Is this right? -Rod On Jul 13, 2006, at 8:00 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: 'check' isn't in any public version of GHC just yet. We have the code, but have not yet gotten it into the main darcs repository. Sorry. Simon | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | On Behalf Of S Koray Can | Sent: 13 July 2006 03:13 | To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | Subject: Re: STM check operation | | Rodney D Price wrote: | I've been reading the STM papers on Simon PJ's website, but I find that | the GHC I'm using (6.5) changes a few things from the paper's | descriptions. | For instance, atomic becomes atomically and catch becomes | catchSTM. | I can't, however, find throw, and the type signature of check has | changed. | The GHC documentation isn't much help. Is there a discussion, perhaps in | a mailing list archive somewhere, that will shed some light on these | changes? | | I had the same question about check's signature last night. But I do | believe that throw is the same old throw :: Exception - a from | Control.Exception. | | Cheers, | Koray | ___ | Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list | Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
STM check operation
I've been reading the STM papers on Simon PJ's website, but I find that the GHC I'm using (6.5) changes a few things from the paper's descriptions. For instance, atomic becomes atomically and catch becomes catchSTM. I can't, however, find throw, and the type signature of check has changed. The GHC documentation isn't much help. Is there a discussion, perhaps in a mailing list archive somewhere, that will shed some light on these changes? Thanks, -Rod ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
progress on Darwin x86 port?
Hi, Some time ago I persuaded my employer to buy me a new Intel-based Mac. While it runs fast, it doesn't compile many open-source programs, including ghc. On perusing the list archives, I found one or two people working on a port. What's the status? Right now I'm writing Haskell code using ghci, which is running under Rosetta. Is it possible to build an unregisterised version of ghc that would at the very least emit executable binaries on Intel Macs? Thanks, -Rod ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: progress on Darwin x86 port?
Thanks! I first downloaded the binary from pugs.blogs.com and installed it. When I tried to compile a small program, I got this: ghc -o hello hello.hs dyld: Library not loaded: GMP.framework/Versions/A/GMP Referenced from: /usr/local/lib/ghc-6.5.20060608/ghc-6.5.20060608 Reason: no suitable image found. Did find: /Library/Frameworks/GMP.framework/Versions/A/GMP: mach-o, but wrong architecture Trace/BPT trap I then downloaded the binary from www.uni-graz.at and unpacked it. The file was corrupted, but I did get the GMP.framework out of it. Upon removing the first GMP.framework and substituting this one in its place, I was able to compile my simple program. It appears to be working now. Thanks again, -Rod On Jun 27, 2006, at 4:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Take a look here: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/X86OSXGhc -reilly hayes From Rodney D Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 27 Jun 2006: Hi, Some time ago I persuaded my employer to buy me a new Intel-based Mac. While it runs fast, it doesn't compile many open-source programs, including ghc. On perusing the list archives, I found one or two people working on a port. What's the status? Right now I'm writing Haskell code using ghci, which is running under Rosetta. Is it possible to build an unregisterised version of ghc that would at the very least emit executable binaries on Intel Macs? Thanks, -Rod ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
