Exposed module still hidden, why?
Using GHC 6.8.1 on Windows XP, after having used ghc-pkg to expose ' directory-1.0.0.0', I am getting an error when I build haddock that says the package is hidden. When I type ghc-pkg list, the package is not in parenthesis. Typing ghc -v says that it is using the file from C:\ghc\ghc-6.8.1\package.conf. That package.conf file has the 'exposed' set to True for that file. Why does GHC still think the package is hidden? ...\haddock-0.8runhaskell Setup.lhs configure Configuring haddock-0.8... ...\haddock-0.8runhaskell Setup.lhs build Preprocessing executables for haddock-0.8... shift/reduce conflicts: 5 Building haddock-0.8... src/Main.hs:49:7: Could not find module `System.Directory': it is a member of package directory-1.0.0.0, which is hidden ...\haddock-0.8ghc-pkg list C:/ghc/ghc-6.8.1\package.conf: Cabal-1.2.2.0, HUnit-1.2.0.0, OpenGL-2.2.1.1, QuickCheck-1.1.0.0, Win32-2.1.0.0, array-0.1.0.0, base-3.0.0.0, bytestring-0.9.0.1, cgi-3001.1.5.1, containers-0.1.0.0, directory-1.0.0.0, fgl-5.4.1.1, filepath-1.1.0.0, (ghc-6.8.1), haskell-src-1.0.1.1, haskell98-1.0.1.0, hpc-0.5.0.0, html-1.0.1.1, mtl-1.1.0.0, network-2.1.0.0, old-locale-1.0.0.0, old-time-1.0.0.0, packedstring-0.1.0.0, parallel-1.0.0.0, parsec-2.1.0.0, pretty-1.0.0.0, process-1.0.0.0, random-1.0.0.0, regex-base-0.72.0.1, regex-compat-0.71.0.1, regex-posix-0.72.0.1, rts-1.0, stm-2.1.1.0, template-haskell-2.2.0.0, time-1.1.2.0, xhtml-3000.0.2.1 Thanks, Greg ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Exposed module still hidden, why?
As I understand it, Cabal hides all packages by default. If a package is not in your dependencies, it won't be available to the build, no matter the status in ghc-pkg. (Incidentally, this had neat consequences in the past, since it means that packages being hidden in ghc-pkg also does not make them unavailable to cabal. I spent some time at a previous employer attempt to debug a build failure where it turned out that the developer experiencing the failure had not pulled all the changes. In particular, we had packages A, B, and C, where C depended on A and B, and B depended on A. The developer had pulled updates to A and C, but not B. A built and installed a new version, hiding B (which was based on an old version). The developer the build C. Cabal started with everything hidden, then revealed A and B as specified by C's cabal file, and the predictable build failures resulted. I have not tried this with GHC/Cabal builds since 6.4.2, so this is probably no longer possible.) /g On Nov 20, 2007 2:18 PM, Greg Fitzgerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Using GHC 6.8.1 on Windows XP, after having used ghc-pkg to expose 'directory-1.0.0.0', I am getting an error when I build haddock that says the package is hidden. When I type ghc-pkg list, the package is not in parenthesis. Typing ghc -v says that it is using the file from C:\ghc\ghc- 6.8.1\package.conf. That package.conf file has the 'exposed' set to True for that file. Why does GHC still think the package is hidden? ...\haddock-0.8runhaskell Setup.lhs configure Configuring haddock-0.8... ...\haddock-0.8runhaskell Setup.lhs build Preprocessing executables for haddock-0.8... shift/reduce conflicts: 5 Building haddock-0.8... src/Main.hs:49:7: Could not find module `System.Directory': it is a member of package directory-1.0.0.0, which is hidden ...\haddock-0.8ghc-pkg list C:/ghc/ghc-6.8.1\package.conf: Cabal-1.2.2.0, HUnit-1.2.0.0, OpenGL-2.2.1.1, QuickCheck-1.1.0.0, Win32-2.1.0.0, array-0.1.0.0, base-3.0.0.0, bytestring-0.9.0.1, cgi-3001.1.5.1, containers-0.1.0.0, directory-1.0.0.0, fgl-5.4.1.1, filepath-1.1.0.0, (ghc-6.8.1), haskell-src-1.0.1.1, haskell98-1.0.1.0 , hpc-0.5.0.0, html-1.0.1.1, mtl-1.1.0.0, network-2.1.0.0, old-locale-1.0.0.0, old-time-1.0.0.0, packedstring-0.1.0.0, parallel-1.0.0.0, parsec-2.1.0.0, pretty-1.0.0.0, process-1.0.0.0, random-1.0.0.0 , regex-base-0.72.0.1, regex-compat-0.71.0.1, regex-posix-0.72.0.1, rts-1.0, stm-2.1.1.0, template-haskell-2.2.0.0, time-1.1.2.0, xhtml-3000.0.2.1 Thanks, Greg ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users -- The man who'd introduced them didn't much like either of them, though he acted as if he did, anxious as he was to preserve good relations at all times. One never knew, after all, now did one now did one now did one. ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Exposed module still hidden, why?
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 12:18:57PM -0800, Greg Fitzgerald wrote: Using GHC 6.8.1 on Windows XP, after having used ghc-pkg to expose ' directory-1.0.0.0', I am getting an error when I build haddock that says the package is hidden. When I type ghc-pkg list, the package is not in parenthesis. Typing ghc -v says that it is using the file from C:\ghc\ghc-6.8.1\package.conf. That package.conf file has the 'exposed' set to True for that file. Why does GHC still think the package is hidden? ...\haddock-0.8runhaskell Setup.lhs configure Configuring haddock-0.8... ...\haddock-0.8runhaskell Setup.lhs build Preprocessing executables for haddock-0.8... shift/reduce conflicts: 5 Building haddock-0.8... src/Main.hs:49:7: Could not find module `System.Directory': it is a member of package directory-1.0.0.0, which is hidden ...\haddock-0.8ghc-pkg list C:/ghc/ghc-6.8.1\package.conf: Cabal-1.2.2.0, HUnit-1.2.0.0, OpenGL-2.2.1.1, QuickCheck-1.1.0.0, Win32-2.1.0.0, array-0.1.0.0, base-3.0.0.0, bytestring-0.9.0.1, cgi-3001.1.5.1, containers-0.1.0.0, directory-1.0.0.0, fgl-5.4.1.1, filepath-1.1.0.0, (ghc-6.8.1), haskell-src-1.0.1.1, haskell98-1.0.1.0, hpc-0.5.0.0, html-1.0.1.1, mtl-1.1.0.0, network-2.1.0.0, old-locale-1.0.0.0, old-time-1.0.0.0, packedstring-0.1.0.0, parallel-1.0.0.0, parsec-2.1.0.0, pretty-1.0.0.0, process-1.0.0.0, random-1.0.0.0, regex-base-0.72.0.1, regex-compat-0.71.0.1, regex-posix-0.72.0.1, rts-1.0, stm-2.1.1.0, template-haskell-2.2.0.0, time-1.1.2.0, xhtml-3000.0.2.1 This is a Cabal FAQ. Cabal passes -hide-all-packages to GHC to prevent undeclared dependancied from creeping in; so you have to explicitly depend on all used packages. (Would someone who is involved with the cabal web site PLEASE put this up somewhere? FAQs do no good if they have to be typed by humans!) Stefan signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Exposed module still hidden, why?
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 13:25 -0800, Stefan O'Rear wrote: (Would someone who is involved with the cabal web site PLEASE put this up somewhere? FAQs do no good if they have to be typed by humans!) What would you like the text to be and where would you like to see it? Duncan ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
