Mercurial? Re: RFC: migrating to git
Please please consider Mercurial if migration from darcs is inevitable :) P. ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Mercurial? Re: RFC: migrating to git
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Pavel Perikov peri...@gmail.com wrote: Please please consider Mercurial if migration from darcs is inevitable :) While Mercurial is a fine choice, I think there are more Haskellers that use Git than Mercurial. Probably because GitHub is such an awesome service. Johan ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Mercurial? Re: RFC: migrating to git
On 10.01.2011, at 16:40, Johan Tibell wrote: While Mercurial is a fine choice, I think there are more Haskellers that use Git than Mercurial. Probably because GitHub is such an awesome service. Interesting. It will be great to see any numbers (really, just curious). bitbucket seems to be ok too :) For me who got used to darcs Mercurial just seemed so much leaner, simpler etc.. And it presumably have better support on Windows btw (I personally only use Macs though). ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Mercurial? Re: RFC: migrating to git
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Pavel Perikov peri...@gmail.com wrote: On 10.01.2011, at 16:40, Johan Tibell wrote: While Mercurial is a fine choice, I think there are more Haskellers that use Git than Mercurial. Probably because GitHub is such an awesome service. Interesting. It will be great to see any numbers (really, just curious). No real numbers. I've just observed what other Haskellers talk about and where I usually find projects (when they are not in Darcs). We could probably pull the numbers of Hackage. Johan ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Mercurial? Re: RFC: migrating to git
On 10.01.2011, at 18:59, Johan Tibell wrote: I've just observed what other Haskellers talk about and where I usually find projects (when they are not in Darcs). We could probably pull the numbers of Hackage. Probably most valuable are the opinions of GHC development team of course :) Git really seem to be more popular, Mercurial just seem more streamlined to me :) P. ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Mercurial? Re: RFC: migrating to git
On 10.01.2011, at 19:29, Johan Tibell wrote: I'm not trying to get into a Git vs Mercurial argument here. I have more important things to do, like writing code. :) Absolutely true :) ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Re: Mercurial? Re: RFC: migrating to git
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Pavel Perikov peri...@gmail.com wrote: Please please consider Mercurial if migration from darcs is inevitable :) For what it's worth, Mercurial generally interoperates quite well with git and github, using the hg-git plugin. As a longtime Mercurial user and an occasional GHC contributor, it wouldn't be a practical problem for me if GHC were to switch to git. ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
