RE: Multiply Recursive Modules

[Simon Peyton-Jones]

We discussed this and yes it seems like a fine idea.  Thanks.
We should have thought of it ages ago.

Not sure how fast we'll implement it, but it's on the list.

Simon

| -Original Message-
| From: George Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
| Sent: 14 January 2002 16:28
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Multiply Recursive Modules
| 
| 
| Writing .hi-boot files is a pain, and the works (allegedly) 
| containing a compiler which 
| does mutually recursive modules properly seem permanently 
| gummed up.  Therefore may I suggest a new .hs-boot suffix 
| which compiles Haskell to produce just a .hi-boot file?  I 
| already have two .hs-boot files (except I call them .boot.hs 
| to make ghc happy) and they seem to work reasonably well.
| 
| ___
| Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list 
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
| http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-| haskell-users
| 

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Multiply Recursive Modules

[George Russell]

Writing .hi-boot files is a pain, and the works (allegedly) containing a compiler 
which 
does mutually recursive modules properly seem permanently gummed up.  Therefore may I 
suggest
a new .hs-boot suffix which compiles Haskell to produce just a .hi-boot file?  I 
already have
two .hs-boot files (except I call them .boot.hs to make ghc happy) and they seem to 
work
reasonably well.

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users