Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2010-01-04 Thread Neil Mitchell
Hi,

As a suggestion to stop this issue repeating, why not have the latest
URL be an automatic and visible forward to the stable and guaranteed
URL? (I can't remember the HTTP code, but I think it's permanent
redirect) That way people are less likely to see these unstable
URL's in their web browser, copy them, and have them end up all over
the place. I think Google will also avoid indexing them at the latest
URL.

As it happens, I've put in another timebomb into Hoogle by linking to
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base-4.2.0.0/Prelude.html#v:filter
- the very URL Ian said the docs had moved to (but is again unstable
and not guaranteed in the long term). Having the URL redirection would
have avoided that mistake. (I'll fix Hoogle as well though)

Thanks, Neil

2009/12/30 Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com:
 On 29/12/09 11:43, Ian Lynagh wrote:

 You could also use e.g. the
     http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/libraries/index.html
 docs, which are stable.

 I've added symlinks for now.

 Cheers,
        Simon
 ___
 Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
 Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-30 Thread Simon Marlow

On 29/12/09 11:43, Ian Lynagh wrote:


You could also use e.g. the
 http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/libraries/index.html
docs, which are stable.


I've added symlinks for now.

Cheers,
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-29 Thread Ian Lynagh

Hi Neil,

On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 06:24:35PM +, Neil Mitchell wrote:
 
  Yes, this is now
 
  http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base-4.2.0.0/Prelude.html#v:filter
                                                   
 
  I'd suggest that Hoogle shold probably use its own copy of the docs, so
  that it stays in sync with them. Also, you probably want to index the
  set of libraries that come with the Haskell Platform, rather than just
  those that come with GHC.
 
 Too late. We had a stable link, I used it, Google used it, blog posts
 were written that linked to it, I've emailed my wife links to it, I've
 put them in Word documents, I've posted them on internal intranets.
 You can't create a link, put content behind it, then move the content
 - it just breaks the whole web.

The .../latest/... URLs have always been unstable, by definition.
Functions might move between modules, modules might appear and
disappear, entire libraries might be added or removed, the format of
internal anchor names might change, etc. I don't think it makes sense
for hoogle to point to them.

We could add redirects base/* - base-4.2.0.0/* etc now, but we'd have
to keep it up-to-date after each release. We could probably make a small
shell script to do so, so maybe that would be the best plan.

On the other hand, we might be better off just removing the latest/
link. People looking for library docs would be better served by a
Haskell Platform doc page anyway. We'd need to work out what to do with
the links in the GHC docs, though.

 I also think it's a bad idea
 for Hoogle to link off to different documentation from the rest of
 Haskell, it's just not a good idea to fragment the Hoogle universe
 from the rest of the docs.

You could also use e.g. the
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/libraries/index.html
docs, which are stable.


Thanks
Ian

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-29 Thread Simon Marlow

On 28/12/09 11:06, Malcolm Wallace wrote:

Too late. We had a stable link, I used it, Google used it, blog posts
were written that linked to it, I've emailed my wife links to it, I've
put them in Word documents, I've posted them on internal intranets.
You can't create a link, put content behind it, then move the content
- it just breaks the whole web.


And incidentally, the _ghc_docs_ themselves continue to use these stable
links to library docs, most of which are currently broken.

All of the following links from documentation for ghc-6.12.1 give a 404
Not Found. (I do not claim the list is exhaustive.)


This is a good point.  These links are relative (unless I'm mistaken). 
they aren't pointing to the latest docs specifically.  It would be 
onerous to have to update these links every time we bump a library 
version number.


Ian - I think we should use the symlinks you suggested in your other 
message.


I agree that linking to latest is/was a bad idea.  The fact remains 
that it's done all over the place, and we can't fix that now.  We should 
probably stop Google from indexing those pages, as that is probably the 
source of most of the links.


Cheers,
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-28 Thread Malcolm Wallace

Too late. We had a stable link, I used it, Google used it, blog posts
were written that linked to it, I've emailed my wife links to it, I've
put them in Word documents, I've posted them on internal intranets.
You can't create a link, put content behind it, then move the content
- it just breaks the whole web.


And incidentally, the _ghc_docs_ themselves continue to use these  
stable links to library docs, most of which are currently broken.


All of the following links from documentation for ghc-6.12.1 give a  
404 Not Found.  (I do not claim the list is exhaustive.)


from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/packages.html
section 4.8 links to

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/Cabal/Distribution-Simple.html
section 4.8.8 links to
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/Cabal/Distribution-InstalledPackageInfo.html# 
%tInstalledPackageInfo
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/Cabal/Distribution-License.html#t 
:License


from 
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/using-concurrent.html
section 4.12 links to

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Concurrent.html

from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/primitives.html
section 7.2 links to
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc-prim/GHC-Prim.html

from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/syntax-extns.html
section 7.3.10 links to
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/GHC-Exts.html

from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/arrow-notation.html
section 7.10 links twice to

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Arrow.html

from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/pragmas.html
section 7.13.1 links to

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/Cabal/Language-Haskell-Extension.html

from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/special-ids.html
section 7.15 links to
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc-prim/GHC-Prim.html

from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/lang-parallel.html
section 7.18.1 links to

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Concurrent.html
section 7.18.2 links to

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/stm/Control-Concurrent-STM.html
section 7.18.4 links to

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/parallel/Control-Parallel.html

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/parallel/Control-Parallel-Strategies.html

from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/ffi.html
section 8 incorrectly links to

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Concurrent.html
where the real link ought to be
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Foreign.html

from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/ffi-ghc.html
section 8.2.4.2 links to

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Concurrent.html

from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/ghci-windows.html
section 11.2 links to

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/GHC-ConsoleHandler.html


Regards,
Malcolm

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-28 Thread Neil Mitchell
I've now updated Hoogle to point at the new links. I still think the
old link's should be restored (perhaps as a permanent redirect code?),
but at least it doesn't break Hoogle now.

Thanks, Neil

On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Malcolm Wallace
malcolm.wall...@cs.york.ac.uk wrote:
 Too late. We had a stable link, I used it, Google used it, blog posts
 were written that linked to it, I've emailed my wife links to it, I've
 put them in Word documents, I've posted them on internal intranets.
 You can't create a link, put content behind it, then move the content
 - it just breaks the whole web.

 And incidentally, the _ghc_docs_ themselves continue to use these stable
 links to library docs, most of which are currently broken.

 All of the following links from documentation for ghc-6.12.1 give a 404 Not
 Found.  (I do not claim the list is exhaustive.)

 from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/packages.html
 section 4.8 links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/Cabal/Distribution-Simple.html
 section 4.8.8 links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/Cabal/Distribution-InstalledPackageInfo.html#%tInstalledPackageInfo

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/Cabal/Distribution-License.html#t:License

 from
 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/using-concurrent.html
 section 4.12 links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Concurrent.html

 from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/primitives.html
 section 7.2 links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc-prim/GHC-Prim.html

 from
 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/syntax-extns.html
 section 7.3.10 links to
    http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/GHC-Exts.html

 from
 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/arrow-notation.html
 section 7.10 links twice to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Arrow.html

 from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/pragmas.html
 section 7.13.1 links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/Cabal/Language-Haskell-Extension.html

 from
 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/special-ids.html
 section 7.15 links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc-prim/GHC-Prim.html

 from
 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/lang-parallel.html
 section 7.18.1 links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Concurrent.html
 section 7.18.2 links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/stm/Control-Concurrent-STM.html
 section 7.18.4 links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/parallel/Control-Parallel.html

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/parallel/Control-Parallel-Strategies.html

 from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/ffi.html
 section 8 incorrectly links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Concurrent.html
 where the real link ought to be
    http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Foreign.html

 from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/ffi-ghc.html
 section 8.2.4.2 links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Concurrent.html

 from
 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/ghci-windows.html
 section 11.2 links to

  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/GHC-ConsoleHandler.html


 Regards,
    Malcolm

 ___
 Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
 Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-28 Thread Mitar
Hi!

On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Neil Mitchell ndmitch...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've now updated Hoogle to point at the new links. I still think the
 old link's should be restored (perhaps as a permanent redirect code?),
 but at least it doesn't break Hoogle now.

+1

I all the time get to 404 errors nowadays while trying to access documentation.


Mitar
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-27 Thread Neil Mitchell
Hi Ian,

 Yes, this is now

 http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base-4.2.0.0/Prelude.html#v:filter
                                                  

 I'd suggest that Hoogle shold probably use its own copy of the docs, so
 that it stays in sync with them. Also, you probably want to index the
 set of libraries that come with the Haskell Platform, rather than just
 those that come with GHC.

Too late. We had a stable link, I used it, Google used it, blog posts
were written that linked to it, I've emailed my wife links to it, I've
put them in Word documents, I've posted them on internal intranets.
You can't create a link, put content behind it, then move the content
- it just breaks the whole web.

I can fix Hoogle, but I can't fix the rest of the web... I recommend
putting in a permanent redirect from where the old docs used to be to
base 4.0, and then never moving it forward. Or perhaps symlinking
latest to always the latest version. Either way, I think breaking a
huge set of links is a really bad idea. I also think it's a bad idea
for Hoogle to link off to different documentation from the rest of
Haskell, it's just not a good idea to fragment the Hoogle universe
from the rest of the docs.

Thanks, Neil
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-24 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:38:08PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
 On 21/12/2009 00:18, Tom Tobin wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Tom Tobinkorp...@korpios.com  wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Jason Dusekjason.du...@gmail.com  wrote:
   Maybe I missed an email about this...

 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc/index.html

   The link is down.

 The link from the GHC Documentation page points here, which works for me:

 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/index.html

 Sorry, read that too quickly — you're asking about the API.  That is
 indeed a dead link for me.

 Ian, is this something to do with the recent redirects that were added?

It's fallout from #3532 (put library docs in versioned directories so
that we can have multiple versions installed).

I've fixed the online 6.12.1 docs, and filed #3785 to remind myself to
fix it properly for 6.12.2.


Thanks
Ian

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-24 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:34:58PM +, Neil Mitchell wrote:
 Note that other links have gone broken recently:
 
 http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Prelude.html#v:filter
 
 These links are relied upon by Hoogle and Google. I suspect they have
 the same cause.

Yes, this is now

http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base-4.2.0.0/Prelude.html#v:filter
  

I'd suggest that Hoogle shold probably use its own copy of the docs, so
that it stays in sync with them. Also, you probably want to index the
set of libraries that come with the Haskell Platform, rather than just
those that come with GHC.


Thanks
Ian

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-24 Thread Andrés Sicard-Ramírez
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote:


 I've fixed the online 6.12.1 docs,


The link is down for me:

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/libraries/ghc/index.html

-- 
Andrés
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-24 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 09:57:58AM -0500, Andrés Sicard-Ramírez wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote:
 
 
  I've fixed the online 6.12.1 docs,
 
 The link is down for me:
 
 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/libraries/ghc/index.html

Which page is linking to there?


Thanks
Ian

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-24 Thread Isaac Dupree

Ian Lynagh wrote:

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:34:58PM +, Neil Mitchell wrote:

Note that other links have gone broken recently:

http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Prelude.html#v:filter

These links are relied upon by Hoogle and Google. I suspect they have
the same cause.


Yes, this is now

http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base-4.2.0.0/Prelude.html#v:filter
  


I'm tempted to say: the older URL was better, because I could bookmark 
it once and go look anytime at a fairly up-to-date (latest a la the 
URL) version of base.


But GHC includes multiple versions of base currently, so this wish 
doesn't even make as much sense as it could...


-Isaac
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-24 Thread Andrés Sicard-Ramírez
2009/12/24 Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li

 On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 09:57:58AM -0500, Andrés Sicard-Ramírez wrote:
  On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote:
 
  
   I've fixed the online 6.12.1 docs,
 
  The link is down for me:
 
  http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/libraries/ghc/index.html

 Which page is linking to there?


http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/

-- 
Andrés
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-24 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:11:55AM -0500, Andrés Sicard-Ramírez wrote:
 2009/12/24 Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li
 
  On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 09:57:58AM -0500, Andrés Sicard-Ramírez wrote:
   On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote:
  
   
I've fixed the online 6.12.1 docs,
  
   The link is down for me:
  
   http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/libraries/ghc/index.html
 
  Which page is linking to there?
 
 
 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/

Thanks, fixed.


Thanks
Ian

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-23 Thread Neil Mitchell
Note that other links have gone broken recently:

http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Prelude.html#v:filter

These links are relied upon by Hoogle and Google. I suspect they have
the same cause.

Thanks, Neil

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 21/12/2009 00:18, Tom Tobin wrote:

 On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Tom Tobinkorp...@korpios.com  wrote:

 On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Jason Dusekjason.du...@gmail.com
  wrote:

  Maybe I missed an email about this...

    http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc/index.html

  The link is down.

 The link from the GHC Documentation page points here, which works for me:

 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/index.html

 Sorry, read that too quickly — you're asking about the API.  That is
 indeed a dead link for me.

 Ian, is this something to do with the recent redirects that were added?

 Cheers,
        Simon
 ___
 Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
 Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-21 Thread Simon Marlow

On 21/12/2009 00:18, Tom Tobin wrote:

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Tom Tobinkorp...@korpios.com  wrote:

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Jason Dusekjason.du...@gmail.com  wrote:

  Maybe I missed an email about this...

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc/index.html

  The link is down.


The link from the GHC Documentation page points here, which works for me:

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/index.html


Sorry, read that too quickly — you're asking about the API.  That is
indeed a dead link for me.


Ian, is this something to do with the recent redirects that were added?

Cheers,
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-20 Thread Jason Dusek
  Maybe I missed an email about this...

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc/index.html

  The link is down.

--
Jason Dusek
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-20 Thread Tom Tobin
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Jason Dusek jason.du...@gmail.com wrote:
  Maybe I missed an email about this...

    http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc/index.html

  The link is down.

The link from the GHC Documentation page points here, which works for me:

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/index.html
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: Where did the GHC API go?

2009-12-20 Thread Tom Tobin
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Tom Tobin korp...@korpios.com wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Jason Dusek jason.du...@gmail.com wrote:
  Maybe I missed an email about this...

    http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc/index.html

  The link is down.

 The link from the GHC Documentation page points here, which works for me:

 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/index.html

Sorry, read that too quickly — you're asking about the API.  That is
indeed a dead link for me.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users