Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On 2014-07-09 19:18, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On 07/09/2014 09:56 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote: > >> >> BTW: doc/hacker-guide/en-US/markdown/unittest.md seems to lack info on how >> to write tests/bugs/bug-*.t files. >> > > unittest.md is for writing code unit tests using cmockery. > > some details about writing tests/bugs/bug-*.t files is available at [1]. And some more info in tests/README.md > [1] > http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Using_the_Gluster_Test_Framework > /Anders -- Anders Blomdell Email: anders.blomd...@control.lth.se Department of Automatic Control Lund University Phone:+46 46 222 4625 P.O. Box 118 Fax: +46 46 138118 SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On 07/09/2014 09:56 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote: BTW: doc/hacker-guide/en-US/markdown/unittest.md seems to lack info on how to write tests/bugs/bug-*.t files. unittest.md is for writing code unit tests using cmockery. some details about writing tests/bugs/bug-*.t files is available at [1]. Cheers, Vijay [1] http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Using_the_Gluster_Test_Framework ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On 2014-07-09 15:02, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:40:35AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote: >> On 08/07/2014, at 9:53 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote: >> >>> 2. What are the rules for marking a bug as blocking the trackers (can't >>> find one for >>> 3.6.0 yet, so currently a moot point). >> >> We should probably create an alias thing for 3.6.0, like we >> have for 3.5.2: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.5.2 >> >> Not sure who does that, maybe Vijay (CC'd)? > > Anyone can do that, I've now created one for 3.6.0: > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.6.0 Thanks :-) > > When there are urgent bugs that need to get fixed in 3.6.0, open the bug > (not the tracker) and add 'glusterfs-3.6.0' (or 1117822) in the 'blocks' > field. If that is not working due to some permission issues, send an > email to this list or ask on Freenode/IRC in #gluster-dev if someone can > take care of adding it to the tracker. Have added my own favorite itches to it. I still don't feel confident enough with git to add my patches to gerrit and get jenkins to do the right thing is probably even worse, so where I have code that works for me™, bug reports contains patches, please bear with me. Removal of erroneous blockers should preferably be done without flame-throwers :-) BTW: doc/hacker-guide/en-US/markdown/unittest.md seems to lack info on how to write tests/bugs/bug-*.t files. /Anders -- Anders Blomdell Email: anders.blomd...@control.lth.se Department of Automatic Control Lund University Phone:+46 46 222 4625 P.O. Box 118 Fax: +46 46 138118 SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:40:35AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote: > On 08/07/2014, at 9:53 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote: > > > 2. What are the rules for marking a bug as blocking the trackers (can't > > find one for > > 3.6.0 yet, so currently a moot point). > > We should probably create an alias thing for 3.6.0, like we > have for 3.5.2: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.5.2 > > Not sure who does that, maybe Vijay (CC'd)? Anyone can do that, I've now created one for 3.6.0: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.6.0 When there are urgent bugs that need to get fixed in 3.6.0, open the bug (not the tracker) and add 'glusterfs-3.6.0' (or 1117822) in the 'blocks' field. If that is not working due to some permission issues, send an email to this list or ask on Freenode/IRC in #gluster-dev if someone can take care of adding it to the tracker. Niels > > + Justin > > -- > GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org > > An open source, distributed file system scaling to several > petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. > > My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On 08/07/2014, at 9:53 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote: > 2. What are the rules for marking a bug as blocking the trackers (can't find > one for > 3.6.0 yet, so currently a moot point). We should probably create an alias thing for 3.6.0, like we have for 3.5.2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.5.2 Not sure who does that, maybe Vijay (CC'd)? + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On 2014-07-07 21:13, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 07:29:15PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: >> On 2014-07-07 18:17, Niels de Vos wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: On 2014-07-07 15:08, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: >> # rpm -U ./glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm >> ./glusterfs-fuse-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm >> ./glusterfs-cli-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm >> ./glusterfs-libs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm >> ./glusterfs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm >> ./glusterfs-api-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm >> error: Failed dependencies: >> libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) >> qemu-common-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 >> libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) >> qemu-system-x86-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 >> libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) >> qemu-img-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 >> >> >> Feature or bug? >> >> /Anders >> > Hey Anders, > > You should not see this issue as glusterfs-api provides > "/usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0" . > > $rpm -ql glusterfs-api > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.py > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyc > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyo > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.py > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyc > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyo > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/glusterfs_api-3.5.0-py2.7.egg-info > /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.5.0/xlator/mount/api.so > /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0 > /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0.0.0 True for branch release-3.5 from git://git.gluster.org/glusterfs.git, but not for master. >>> >>> Indeed, the master branch uses SONAME-versioning. Any applications (like >>> qemu) using libgfapi.so need to get re-compiled to use the update. >> Can do without these for my current testing :-) > > Of course, removing packages you don't need is a nice workaround :) > >> >>> > > Is there any specific reason you want to use > "glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm"? because > 3.5.1 is available in fedora 20 in update repo . So if you do yum > update it i.e. "yum update glusterfs-server" you should get glusterfs > 3.5.1 GA version which like to be stable than > glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722. I would like to track progress of the fixing of my bugs and at the same time experiment with reverting 3dc56cbd16b1074d7ca1a4fe4c5bf44400eb63ff to re-add IPv6 support, and I figured that the master is what will eventually become 3.6.0 >>> >>> Yes, you are correct. The master branch will become glusterfs-3.6. You >>> should be able to recompile qemu (and other?) packages on a system that >>> has glusterfs-devel-3.6 installed. I can also recommend the use of >>> 'mockchain' (from the 'mock' package) for rebuilding glusterfs and other >>> dependent packages. >> I'll keep tracking master (exposing as many bugs as I can), I'll redirect >> followups to gluster-devel@gluster.org and drop gluster-us...@gluster.org >> after this message. > > Great, thanks for the testing! Will hopefully get me a better product in the end :-) A few questions: 1. Should bugs/patches be posted on the list or should I file a BugZilla for each? 2. What are the rules for marking a bug as blocking the trackers (can't find one for 3.6.0 yet, so currently a moot point). 3. Given that my understanding of gluster innards is very limited, my guess is that the 'GlusterFS Development Workflow' is a overkill, but please correct me if I'm wrong. /Anders -- Anders Blomdell Email: anders.blomd...@control.lth.se Department of Automatic Control Lund University Phone:+46 46 222 4625 P.O. Box 118 Fax: +46 46 138118 SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 07:29:15PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: > On 2014-07-07 18:17, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: > >> On 2014-07-07 15:08, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > # rpm -U ./glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm > ./glusterfs-fuse-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm > ./glusterfs-cli-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm > ./glusterfs-libs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm > ./glusterfs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm > ./glusterfs-api-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) > qemu-common-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 > libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) > qemu-system-x86-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 > libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) > qemu-img-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 > > > Feature or bug? > > /Anders > > >>> Hey Anders, > >>> > >>> You should not see this issue as glusterfs-api provides > >>> "/usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0" . > >>> > >>> $rpm -ql glusterfs-api > >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.py > >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyc > >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyo > >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.py > >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyc > >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyo > >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/glusterfs_api-3.5.0-py2.7.egg-info > >>> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.5.0/xlator/mount/api.so > >>> /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0 > >>> /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0.0.0 > >> True for branch release-3.5 from git://git.gluster.org/glusterfs.git, but > >> not for master. > > > > Indeed, the master branch uses SONAME-versioning. Any applications (like > > qemu) using libgfapi.so need to get re-compiled to use the update. > Can do without these for my current testing :-) Of course, removing packages you don't need is a nice workaround :) > > > > >>> > >>> Is there any specific reason you want to use > >>> "glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm"? because > >>> 3.5.1 is available in fedora 20 in update repo . So if you do yum > >>> update it i.e. "yum update glusterfs-server" you should get glusterfs > >>> 3.5.1 GA version which like to be stable than > >>> glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722. > >> I would like to track progress of the fixing of my bugs and at the same > >> time experiment > >> with reverting 3dc56cbd16b1074d7ca1a4fe4c5bf44400eb63ff to re-add IPv6 > >> support, and I figured that the master is what will eventually become > >> 3.6.0 > > > > Yes, you are correct. The master branch will become glusterfs-3.6. You > > should be able to recompile qemu (and other?) packages on a system that > > has glusterfs-devel-3.6 installed. I can also recommend the use of > > 'mockchain' (from the 'mock' package) for rebuilding glusterfs and other > > dependent packages. > I'll keep tracking master (exposing as many bugs as I can), I'll redirect > followups to gluster-devel@gluster.org and drop gluster-us...@gluster.org > after this message. Great, thanks for the testing! Niels ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] RPM's for latest glusterfs does not install on Fedora-20
On 2014-07-07 18:17, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: >> On 2014-07-07 15:08, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: # rpm -U ./glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-fuse-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-cli-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-libs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm ./glusterfs-api-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-common-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-system-x86-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) qemu-img-2:1.6.2-6.fc20.x86_64 Feature or bug? /Anders >>> Hey Anders, >>> >>> You should not see this issue as glusterfs-api provides >>> "/usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0" . >>> >>> $rpm -ql glusterfs-api >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.py >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyc >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/__init__.pyo >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.py >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyc >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster/gfapi.pyo >>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/glusterfs_api-3.5.0-py2.7.egg-info >>> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.5.0/xlator/mount/api.so >>> /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0 >>> /usr/lib64/libgfapi.so.0.0.0 >> True for branch release-3.5 from git://git.gluster.org/glusterfs.git, but >> not for master. > > Indeed, the master branch uses SONAME-versioning. Any applications (like > qemu) using libgfapi.so need to get re-compiled to use the update. Can do without these for my current testing :-) > >>> >>> Is there any specific reason you want to use >>> "glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722.git2c5eb5c.fc20.x86_64.rpm"? because >>> 3.5.1 is available in fedora 20 in update repo . So if you do yum >>> update it i.e. "yum update glusterfs-server" you should get glusterfs >>> 3.5.1 GA version which like to be stable than >>> glusterfs-server-3.5qa2-0.722. >> I would like to track progress of the fixing of my bugs and at the same time >> experiment >> with reverting 3dc56cbd16b1074d7ca1a4fe4c5bf44400eb63ff to re-add IPv6 >> support, and I figured that the master is what will eventually become >> 3.6.0 > > Yes, you are correct. The master branch will become glusterfs-3.6. You > should be able to recompile qemu (and other?) packages on a system that > has glusterfs-devel-3.6 installed. I can also recommend the use of > 'mockchain' (from the 'mock' package) for rebuilding glusterfs and other > dependent packages. I'll keep tracking master (exposing as many bugs as I can), I'll redirect followups to gluster-devel@gluster.org and drop gluster-us...@gluster.org after this message. Thanks! /Anders -- Anders Blomdell Email: anders.blomd...@control.lth.se Department of Automatic Control Lund University Phone:+46 46 222 4625 P.O. Box 118 Fax: +46 46 138118 SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
