Re: [Gluster-devel] New regression failure with EC
Thanks Kaushal, I think I've identified the cause. I filed a bug for it [1] and I'm working on the patch. I'll try to upload it as soon as possible. Xavi On 05/28/2015 07:33 AM, Kaushal M wrote: Got a EC test failure ( ./tests/bugs/disperse/bug-1161621.t) on http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9628/consoleFull The change being tested was a pure GlusterD change, so this is most likely a (new?) spurious failure. ~kaushal ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] New regression failure with EC
Oops, I missed the link :P [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225793 On 05/28/2015 11:21 AM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: Thanks Kaushal, I think I've identified the cause. I filed a bug for it [1] and I'm working on the patch. I'll try to upload it as soon as possible. Xavi On 05/28/2015 07:33 AM, Kaushal M wrote: Got a EC test failure ( ./tests/bugs/disperse/bug-1161621.t) on http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9628/consoleFull The change being tested was a pure GlusterD change, so this is most likely a (new?) spurious failure. ~kaushal ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] New regression failure with EC
I am looking into it. Pranith On 05/28/2015 11:03 AM, Kaushal M wrote: Got a EC test failure ( ./tests/bugs/disperse/bug-1161621.t) on http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9628/consoleFull The change being tested was a pure GlusterD change, so this is most likely a (new?) spurious failure. ~kaushal ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
[Gluster-devel] New regression failure with EC
Got a EC test failure ( ./tests/bugs/disperse/bug-1161621.t) on http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9628/consoleFull The change being tested was a pure GlusterD change, so this is most likely a (new?) spurious failure. ~kaushal ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
