Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > Will take a look. > Patch https://review.gluster.org/16419 indeed had a bug. It used to zero out stats just retaining ia_gfid and ia_type. However, fuse_readdirp_cbk would pass the attributes as valid to kernel causing the bug. I've fixed this issue in https://review.gluster.org/20639. > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Krutika Dhananjay > wrote: > >> Adding Raghavendra G who actually restored and reworked on this after it >> was abandoned. >> >> -Krutika >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Nithya Balachandran >> wrote: >> >>> Using git bisect, the patch that introduced this behaviour is : >>> >>> commit 7131de81f72dda0ef685ed60d0887c6e14289b8c >>> Author: Krutika Dhananjay >>> Date: Tue Jan 17 16:40:04 2017 +0530 >>> >>> performance/readdir-ahead: Invalidate cached dentries if they're >>> modified while in cache >>> >>> Krutika, can you take a look and fix this? >>> >>> To summarize, this is _not_ a spurious failure. >>> >>> >>> regards, >>> Nithya >>> >>> >>> On 3 August 2018 at 14:13, Nithya Balachandran >>> wrote: >>> This is a new issue - the test uses ls -l to get some information. With the latest master, ls -l returns strange results the first time it is called on the mount point causing the test to fail: With the latest master, I created a single brick volume and some files inside it. [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# umount -f /mnt/fuse1; mount -t glusterfs -s 192.168.122.6:/thunder /mnt/fuse1; ls -l /mnt/fuse1/; echo "Trying again"; ls -l /mnt/fuse1 umount: /mnt/fuse1: not mounted total 0 *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-1* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-2* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-3* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-4* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-5* *d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir* Trying again total 3 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-1 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-2 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-3 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-5 d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# This is consistently reproducible. I am still debugging this to see which patch caused this. regards, Nithya On 2 August 2018 at 07:13, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 07:05, Susant Palai wrote: > >> Will have a look at it and update. >> > > There’s already a patch from Mohit for this. > > >> Susant >> >> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 18:58 Krutika Dhananjay, >> wrote: >> >>> Same here - https://build.gluster.org/job/ >>> centos7-regression/2024/console >>> >>> -Krutika >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee >> > wrote: >>> tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 times) running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen this test failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One of such instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/ centos7-regression/1955/ . Request the component owners to take a look at it. ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>> ___ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > -- > --Atin > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > >>> >> > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > Why not revert, fix and resubmit (unless you can quickly fix it)? > Y. > https://review.gluster.org/20634 > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 5:04 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa > wrote: > >> Will take a look. >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Krutika Dhananjay >> wrote: >> >>> Adding Raghavendra G who actually restored and reworked on this after it >>> was abandoned. >>> >>> -Krutika >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Nithya Balachandran >> > wrote: >>> Using git bisect, the patch that introduced this behaviour is : commit 7131de81f72dda0ef685ed60d0887c6e14289b8c Author: Krutika Dhananjay Date: Tue Jan 17 16:40:04 2017 +0530 performance/readdir-ahead: Invalidate cached dentries if they're modified while in cache Krutika, can you take a look and fix this? To summarize, this is _not_ a spurious failure. regards, Nithya On 3 August 2018 at 14:13, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > This is a new issue - the test uses ls -l to get some information. > With the latest master, ls -l returns strange results the first time it is > called on the mount point causing the test to fail: > > > With the latest master, I created a single brick volume and some files > inside it. > > [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# umount -f /mnt/fuse1; mount -t glusterfs -s > 192.168.122.6:/thunder /mnt/fuse1; ls -l /mnt/fuse1/; echo "Trying > again"; ls -l /mnt/fuse1 > umount: /mnt/fuse1: not mounted > total 0 > *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-1* > *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-2* > *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-3* > *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-4* > *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-5* > *d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir* > Trying again > total 3 > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-1 > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-2 > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-3 > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-4 > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-5 > d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir > [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# > > > > This is consistently reproducible. I am still debugging this to see > which patch caused this. > > regards, > Nithya > > > On 2 August 2018 at 07:13, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 07:05, Susant Palai wrote: >> >>> Will have a look at it and update. >>> >> >> There’s already a patch from Mohit for this. >> >> >>> Susant >>> >>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 18:58 Krutika Dhananjay, >>> wrote: >>> Same here - https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/2024/ console -Krutika On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee < amukh...@redhat.com> wrote: > tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 > times) running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen > this > test failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. > One of > such instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/ > centos7-regression/1955/ . > > Request the component owners to take a look at it. > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>> ___ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> -- >> --Atin >> >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > > >>> >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure
Why not revert, fix and resubmit (unless you can quickly fix it)? Y. On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 5:04 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > Will take a look. > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Krutika Dhananjay > wrote: > >> Adding Raghavendra G who actually restored and reworked on this after it >> was abandoned. >> >> -Krutika >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Nithya Balachandran >> wrote: >> >>> Using git bisect, the patch that introduced this behaviour is : >>> >>> commit 7131de81f72dda0ef685ed60d0887c6e14289b8c >>> Author: Krutika Dhananjay >>> Date: Tue Jan 17 16:40:04 2017 +0530 >>> >>> performance/readdir-ahead: Invalidate cached dentries if they're >>> modified while in cache >>> >>> Krutika, can you take a look and fix this? >>> >>> To summarize, this is _not_ a spurious failure. >>> >>> >>> regards, >>> Nithya >>> >>> >>> On 3 August 2018 at 14:13, Nithya Balachandran >>> wrote: >>> This is a new issue - the test uses ls -l to get some information. With the latest master, ls -l returns strange results the first time it is called on the mount point causing the test to fail: With the latest master, I created a single brick volume and some files inside it. [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# umount -f /mnt/fuse1; mount -t glusterfs -s 192.168.122.6:/thunder /mnt/fuse1; ls -l /mnt/fuse1/; echo "Trying again"; ls -l /mnt/fuse1 umount: /mnt/fuse1: not mounted total 0 *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-1* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-2* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-3* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-4* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-5* *d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir* Trying again total 3 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-1 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-2 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-3 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-5 d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# This is consistently reproducible. I am still debugging this to see which patch caused this. regards, Nithya On 2 August 2018 at 07:13, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 07:05, Susant Palai wrote: > >> Will have a look at it and update. >> > > There’s already a patch from Mohit for this. > > >> Susant >> >> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 18:58 Krutika Dhananjay, >> wrote: >> >>> Same here - >>> https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/2024/console >>> >>> -Krutika >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee >> > wrote: >>> tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 times) running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen this test failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One of such instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/1955/ . Request the component owners to take a look at it. ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>> ___ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > -- > --Atin > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > >>> >> > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure
Will take a look. On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > Adding Raghavendra G who actually restored and reworked on this after it > was abandoned. > > -Krutika > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Nithya Balachandran > wrote: > >> Using git bisect, the patch that introduced this behaviour is : >> >> commit 7131de81f72dda0ef685ed60d0887c6e14289b8c >> Author: Krutika Dhananjay >> Date: Tue Jan 17 16:40:04 2017 +0530 >> >> performance/readdir-ahead: Invalidate cached dentries if they're >> modified while in cache >> >> Krutika, can you take a look and fix this? >> >> To summarize, this is _not_ a spurious failure. >> >> >> regards, >> Nithya >> >> >> On 3 August 2018 at 14:13, Nithya Balachandran >> wrote: >> >>> This is a new issue - the test uses ls -l to get some information. With >>> the latest master, ls -l returns strange results the first time it is >>> called on the mount point causing the test to fail: >>> >>> >>> With the latest master, I created a single brick volume and some files >>> inside it. >>> >>> [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# umount -f /mnt/fuse1; mount -t glusterfs -s >>> 192.168.122.6:/thunder /mnt/fuse1; ls -l /mnt/fuse1/; echo "Trying >>> again"; ls -l /mnt/fuse1 >>> umount: /mnt/fuse1: not mounted >>> total 0 >>> *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-1* >>> *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-2* >>> *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-3* >>> *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-4* >>> *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-5* >>> *d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir* >>> Trying again >>> total 3 >>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-1 >>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-2 >>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-3 >>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-4 >>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-5 >>> d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir >>> [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# >>> >>> >>> >>> This is consistently reproducible. I am still debugging this to see >>> which patch caused this. >>> >>> regards, >>> Nithya >>> >>> >>> On 2 August 2018 at 07:13, Atin Mukherjee >>> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 07:05, Susant Palai wrote: > Will have a look at it and update. > There’s already a patch from Mohit for this. > Susant > > On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 18:58 Krutika Dhananjay, > wrote: > >> Same here - https://build.gluster.org/job/ >> centos7-regression/2024/console >> >> -Krutika >> >> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee >> wrote: >> >>> tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 >>> times) running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen >>> this >>> test failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One >>> of >>> such instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/ >>> centos7-regression/1955/ . >>> >>> Request the component owners to take a look at it. >>> >>> ___ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >> >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel -- --Atin ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>> >> > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure
Adding Raghavendra G who actually restored and reworked on this after it was abandoned. -Krutika On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > Using git bisect, the patch that introduced this behaviour is : > > commit 7131de81f72dda0ef685ed60d0887c6e14289b8c > Author: Krutika Dhananjay > Date: Tue Jan 17 16:40:04 2017 +0530 > > performance/readdir-ahead: Invalidate cached dentries if they're > modified while in cache > > Krutika, can you take a look and fix this? > > To summarize, this is _not_ a spurious failure. > > > regards, > Nithya > > > On 3 August 2018 at 14:13, Nithya Balachandran > wrote: > >> This is a new issue - the test uses ls -l to get some information. With >> the latest master, ls -l returns strange results the first time it is >> called on the mount point causing the test to fail: >> >> >> With the latest master, I created a single brick volume and some files >> inside it. >> >> [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# umount -f /mnt/fuse1; mount -t glusterfs -s >> 192.168.122.6:/thunder /mnt/fuse1; ls -l /mnt/fuse1/; echo "Trying >> again"; ls -l /mnt/fuse1 >> umount: /mnt/fuse1: not mounted >> total 0 >> *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-1* >> *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-2* >> *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-3* >> *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-4* >> *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-5* >> *d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir* >> Trying again >> total 3 >> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-1 >> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-2 >> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-3 >> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-4 >> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-5 >> d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir >> [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# >> >> >> >> This is consistently reproducible. I am still debugging this to see which >> patch caused this. >> >> regards, >> Nithya >> >> >> On 2 August 2018 at 07:13, Atin Mukherjee >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 07:05, Susant Palai wrote: >>> Will have a look at it and update. >>> >>> There’s already a patch from Mohit for this. >>> >>> Susant On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 18:58 Krutika Dhananjay, wrote: > Same here - https://build.gluster.org/job/ > centos7-regression/2024/console > > -Krutika > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 >> times) running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen this >> test failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One >> of >> such instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/ >> centos7-regression/1955/ . >> >> Request the component owners to take a look at it. >> >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>> -- >>> --Atin >>> >>> ___ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >> >> > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure
Using git bisect, the patch that introduced this behaviour is : commit 7131de81f72dda0ef685ed60d0887c6e14289b8c Author: Krutika Dhananjay Date: Tue Jan 17 16:40:04 2017 +0530 performance/readdir-ahead: Invalidate cached dentries if they're modified while in cache Krutika, can you take a look and fix this? To summarize, this is _not_ a spurious failure. regards, Nithya On 3 August 2018 at 14:13, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > This is a new issue - the test uses ls -l to get some information. With > the latest master, ls -l returns strange results the first time it is > called on the mount point causing the test to fail: > > > With the latest master, I created a single brick volume and some files > inside it. > > [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# umount -f /mnt/fuse1; mount -t glusterfs -s > 192.168.122.6:/thunder /mnt/fuse1; ls -l /mnt/fuse1/; echo "Trying > again"; ls -l /mnt/fuse1 > umount: /mnt/fuse1: not mounted > total 0 > *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-1* > *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-2* > *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-3* > *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-4* > *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-5* > *d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir* > Trying again > total 3 > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-1 > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-2 > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-3 > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-4 > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-5 > d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir > [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# > > > > This is consistently reproducible. I am still debugging this to see which > patch caused this. > > regards, > Nithya > > > On 2 August 2018 at 07:13, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 07:05, Susant Palai wrote: >> >>> Will have a look at it and update. >>> >> >> There’s already a patch from Mohit for this. >> >> >>> Susant >>> >>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 18:58 Krutika Dhananjay, >>> wrote: >>> Same here - https://build.gluster.org/job/ centos7-regression/2024/console -Krutika On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 > times) running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen this > test failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One of > such instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/ > centos7-regression/1955/ . > > Request the component owners to take a look at it. > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>> ___ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> -- >> --Atin >> >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure
This is a new issue - the test uses ls -l to get some information. With the latest master, ls -l returns strange results the first time it is called on the mount point causing the test to fail: With the latest master, I created a single brick volume and some files inside it. [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# umount -f /mnt/fuse1; mount -t glusterfs -s 192.168.122.6:/thunder /mnt/fuse1; ls -l /mnt/fuse1/; echo "Trying again"; ls -l /mnt/fuse1 umount: /mnt/fuse1: not mounted total 0 *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-1* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-2* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-3* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-4* *--. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-5* *d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir* Trying again total 3 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-1 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-2 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-3 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-5 d-. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir [root@rhgs313-6 ~]# This is consistently reproducible. I am still debugging this to see which patch caused this. regards, Nithya On 2 August 2018 at 07:13, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 07:05, Susant Palai wrote: > >> Will have a look at it and update. >> > > There’s already a patch from Mohit for this. > > >> Susant >> >> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 18:58 Krutika Dhananjay, wrote: >> >>> Same here - https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/2024/ >>> console >>> >>> -Krutika >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee >>> wrote: >>> tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 times) running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen this test failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One of such instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/1955/ . Request the component owners to take a look at it. ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>> ___ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > -- > --Atin > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 07:05, Susant Palai wrote: > Will have a look at it and update. > There’s already a patch from Mohit for this. > Susant > > On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 18:58 Krutika Dhananjay, wrote: > >> Same here - https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/2024/console >> >> -Krutika >> >> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee >> wrote: >> >>> tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 times) >>> running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen this test >>> failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One of such >>> instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/1955/ . >>> >>> Request the component owners to take a look at it. >>> >>> ___ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >> >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel -- --Atin ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure
Will have a look at it and update. Susant On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 18:58 Krutika Dhananjay, wrote: > Same here - https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/2024/console > > -Krutika > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 times) >> running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen this test >> failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One of such >> instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/1955/ . >> >> Request the component owners to take a look at it. >> >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure
Same here - https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/2024/console -Krutika On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 times) > running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen this test > failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One of such > instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/1955/ . > > Request the component owners to take a look at it. > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
[Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure
tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 times) running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen this test failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One of such instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/1955/ . Request the component owners to take a look at it. ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
