Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing report: Gluster v3.6.1 on CentOS 6.6

[Atin Mukherjee]

On 11/12/2014 06:13 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> 
> On 11/11/2014 05:25 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:
>> I have installed gluster v3.6.1
>> from 
>> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/EPEL.repo/epel-6/
>>
>>
>> The /tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t testcase passed in all 3 runs and rest
>> of the two tests quota-anon-fd-nfs.t,
>> /tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t failed in all 3 runs.
> Thanks for this mail Kiran. http://review.gluster.org/8201 will fix
> /tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t
> 
> CCed vijaikumar to look into the quota-anon-fd-nfs.t
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9108/ should fix this spurious failure.

~Atin
> 
> Pranith
>>
>> Ondisk filesystem is ext4.
>>
>> Thanks for quick feedback.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
>> mailto:pkara...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/11/2014 03:13 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:
>>> Test Summary Report
>>> --
>>> ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t  (Wstat: 0
>>> Tests: 16 Failed: 1)
>>>   Failed test:  16
>> This is a spurious failure at least on master. Could you run it
>> 2-3 times to see if it is a consistent failure on cent-os.
>>> ./tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t   (Wstat: 0
>>> Tests: 30 Failed: 2)
>>>   Failed tests:  10, 24
>> What is the underlying backend filesystem?
>>> ./tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t (Wstat: 0
>>> Tests: 11 Failed: 2)
>>>   Failed tests:  9, 11
>> CC Joseph fernandez
>>> Files=277, Tests=7908, 8046 wallclock secs ( 4.54 usr  0.98 sys +
>>> 902.74 cusr 644.05 csys = 1552.31 CPU)
>>> Result: FAIL
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org 
>>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing report: Gluster v3.6.1 on CentOS 6.6

[Pranith Kumar Karampuri]

On 11/11/2014 05:25 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:
I have installed gluster v3.6.1 from 
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/EPEL.repo/epel-6/ 



The /tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t testcase passed in all 3 runs and rest 
of the two tests quota-anon-fd-nfs.t, 
/tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t failed in all 3 runs.
Thanks for this mail Kiran. http://review.gluster.org/8201 will fix 
/tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t


CCed vijaikumar to look into the quota-anon-fd-nfs.t

Pranith


Ondisk filesystem is ext4.

Thanks for quick feedback.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri 
mailto:pkara...@redhat.com>> wrote:



On 11/11/2014 03:13 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:

Test Summary Report
--
./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1)
  Failed test:  16

This is a spurious failure at least on master. Could you run it
2-3 times to see if it is a consistent failure on cent-os.

./tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30
Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  10, 24

What is the underlying backend filesystem?

./tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 11 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  9, 11

CC Joseph fernandez

Files=277, Tests=7908, 8046 wallclock secs ( 4.54 usr  0.98 sys +
902.74 cusr 644.05 csys = 1552.31 CPU)
Result: FAIL



___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org  
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel





___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing report: Gluster v3.6.1 on CentOS 6.6

[Kiran Patil]

I have installed gluster v3.6.1 from
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/EPEL.repo/epel-6/

The /tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t testcase passed in all 3 runs and rest of the
two tests quota-anon-fd-nfs.t, /tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t failed
in all 3 runs.

Ondisk filesystem is ext4.

Thanks for quick feedback.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On 11/11/2014 03:13 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:
>
>  Test Summary Report
> --
> ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t  (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16
> Failed: 1)
>   Failed test:  16
>
> This is a spurious failure at least on master. Could you run it 2-3 times
> to see if it is a consistent failure on cent-os.
>
>  ./tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t   (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30
> Failed: 2)
>   Failed tests:  10, 24
>
> What is the underlying backend filesystem?
>
>  ./tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 11
> Failed: 2)
>   Failed tests:  9, 11
>
> CC Joseph fernandez
>
>  Files=277, Tests=7908, 8046 wallclock secs ( 4.54 usr  0.98 sys + 902.74
> cusr 644.05 csys = 1552.31 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
>
>
>
> ___
> Gluster-devel mailing 
> listGluster-devel@gluster.orghttp://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
>
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing report: Gluster v3.6.1 on CentOS 6.6

[Pranith Kumar Karampuri]

On 11/11/2014 03:13 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:

Test Summary Report
--
./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t  (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 
Failed: 1)

  Failed test:  16
This is a spurious failure at least on master. Could you run it 2-3 
times to see if it is a consistent failure on cent-os.
./tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t   (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30 
Failed: 2)

  Failed tests:  10, 24

What is the underlying backend filesystem?
./tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 11 
Failed: 2)

  Failed tests:  9, 11

CC Joseph fernandez
Files=277, Tests=7908, 8046 wallclock secs ( 4.54 usr  0.98 sys + 
902.74 cusr 644.05 csys = 1552.31 CPU)

Result: FAIL



___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel


___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel