Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch

2014-05-22 Thread Justin Clift
/glusterd-backend%N.log maybe?

On 22/05/2014, at 8:03 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
> The glusterds spawned using cluster.rc store their logs at 
> /d/backends//glusterd.log . But the cleanup() function cleans 
> /d/backends/, so those logs are lost before we can archive.
> 
> cluster.rc should be fixed to use a better location for the logs.
> 
> ~kaushal

--
Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat

twitter.com/realjustinclift

___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel


Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch

2014-05-22 Thread Kaushal M
The glusterds spawned using cluster.rc store their logs at
/d/backends//glusterd.log . But the cleanup() function cleans
/d/backends/, so those logs are lost before we can archive.

cluster.rc should be fixed to use a better location for the logs.

~kaushal


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Kaushal M  wrote:

> It should be possible. I'll check and do the change.
>
> ~kaushal
>
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
> pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" 
>> > To: "Justin Clift" 
>> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" 
>> > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 6:23:16 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master
>> branch
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > - Original Message -
>> > > From: "Justin Clift" 
>> > > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" 
>> > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" 
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:01:36 PM
>> > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master
>> branch
>> > >
>> > > On 21/05/2014, at 6:17 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > >
>> > > > Kicked off 21 VM's in Rackspace earlier today, running the
>> regression
>> > > > tests
>> > > > against master branch.
>> > > >
>> > > > Only 3 VM's failed out of the 21 (86% PASS, 14% FAIL), with all
>> three
>> > > > being
>> > > > for the same test:
>> > > >
>> > > > Test Summary Report
>> > > > ---
>> > > > ./tests/bugs/bug-948686.t   (Wstat: 0 Tests: 20
>> > > > Failed:
>> > > > 2)
>> > > >  Failed tests:  13-14
>> > > > Files=230, Tests=4373, 5601 wallclock secs ( 2.09 usr  1.58 sys +
>> 1012.66
>> > > > cusr 688.80 csys = 1705.13 CPU)
>> > > > Result: FAIL
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Interestingly, this one looks like a simple time based thing
>> > > too.  The failed tests are the ones after the sleep:
>> > >
>> > >   ...
>> > >   #modify volume config to see change in volume-sync
>> > >   TEST $CLI_1 volume set $V0 write-behind off
>> > >   #add some files to the volume to see effect of volume-heal cmd
>> > >   TEST touch $M0/{1..100};
>> > >   TEST $CLI_1 volume stop $V0;
>> > >   TEST $glusterd_3;
>> > >   sleep 3;
>> > >   TEST $CLI_3 volume start $V0;
>> > >   TEST $CLI_2 volume stop $V0;
>> > >   TEST $CLI_2 volume delete $V0;
>> > >
>> > > Do you already have this one on your radar?
>> >
>> > It wasn't, thanks for bringing it on my radar :-). Sent
>> > http://review.gluster.org/7837 to address this.
>>
>> Kaushal,
>> I made this fix based on the assumption that the script seems to be
>> waiting for all glusterds to be online. I could not check the logs because
>> glusterds spawned by cluster.rc seem to be storing the logs not in the
>> default location. Do you think we can make changes to the script so that we
>> can get logs from glusterds spawned by cluster.rc as well?
>>
>> Pranith
>>
>> >
>> > Pranith
>> >
>> > >
>> > > + Justin
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
>> > >
>> > > twitter.com/realjustinclift
>> > >
>> > >
>> > ___
>> > Gluster-devel mailing list
>> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
>> > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>> >
>> ___
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org
>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
>
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel


Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch

2014-05-21 Thread Kaushal M
It should be possible. I'll check and do the change.

~kaushal


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" 
> > To: "Justin Clift" 
> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" 
> > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 6:23:16 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Justin Clift" 
> > > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" 
> > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" 
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:01:36 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master
> branch
> > >
> > > On 21/05/2014, at 6:17 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Kicked off 21 VM's in Rackspace earlier today, running the regression
> > > > tests
> > > > against master branch.
> > > >
> > > > Only 3 VM's failed out of the 21 (86% PASS, 14% FAIL), with all three
> > > > being
> > > > for the same test:
> > > >
> > > > Test Summary Report
> > > > ---
> > > > ./tests/bugs/bug-948686.t   (Wstat: 0 Tests: 20
> > > > Failed:
> > > > 2)
> > > >  Failed tests:  13-14
> > > > Files=230, Tests=4373, 5601 wallclock secs ( 2.09 usr  1.58 sys +
> 1012.66
> > > > cusr 688.80 csys = 1705.13 CPU)
> > > > Result: FAIL
> > >
> > >
> > > Interestingly, this one looks like a simple time based thing
> > > too.  The failed tests are the ones after the sleep:
> > >
> > >   ...
> > >   #modify volume config to see change in volume-sync
> > >   TEST $CLI_1 volume set $V0 write-behind off
> > >   #add some files to the volume to see effect of volume-heal cmd
> > >   TEST touch $M0/{1..100};
> > >   TEST $CLI_1 volume stop $V0;
> > >   TEST $glusterd_3;
> > >   sleep 3;
> > >   TEST $CLI_3 volume start $V0;
> > >   TEST $CLI_2 volume stop $V0;
> > >   TEST $CLI_2 volume delete $V0;
> > >
> > > Do you already have this one on your radar?
> >
> > It wasn't, thanks for bringing it on my radar :-). Sent
> > http://review.gluster.org/7837 to address this.
>
> Kaushal,
> I made this fix based on the assumption that the script seems to be
> waiting for all glusterds to be online. I could not check the logs because
> glusterds spawned by cluster.rc seem to be storing the logs not in the
> default location. Do you think we can make changes to the script so that we
> can get logs from glusterds spawned by cluster.rc as well?
>
> Pranith
>
> >
> > Pranith
> >
> > >
> > > + Justin
> > >
> > > --
> > > Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
> > >
> > > twitter.com/realjustinclift
> > >
> > >
> > ___
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> ___
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel


Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch

2014-05-21 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri


- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" 
> To: "Justin Clift" 
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" 
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 6:23:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Justin Clift" 
> > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" 
> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" 
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:01:36 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch
> > 
> > On 21/05/2014, at 6:17 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Kicked off 21 VM's in Rackspace earlier today, running the regression
> > > tests
> > > against master branch.
> > > 
> > > Only 3 VM's failed out of the 21 (86% PASS, 14% FAIL), with all three
> > > being
> > > for the same test:
> > > 
> > > Test Summary Report
> > > ---
> > > ./tests/bugs/bug-948686.t   (Wstat: 0 Tests: 20
> > > Failed:
> > > 2)
> > >  Failed tests:  13-14
> > > Files=230, Tests=4373, 5601 wallclock secs ( 2.09 usr  1.58 sys + 1012.66
> > > cusr 688.80 csys = 1705.13 CPU)
> > > Result: FAIL
> > 
> > 
> > Interestingly, this one looks like a simple time based thing
> > too.  The failed tests are the ones after the sleep:
> > 
> >   ...
> >   #modify volume config to see change in volume-sync
> >   TEST $CLI_1 volume set $V0 write-behind off
> >   #add some files to the volume to see effect of volume-heal cmd
> >   TEST touch $M0/{1..100};
> >   TEST $CLI_1 volume stop $V0;
> >   TEST $glusterd_3;
> >   sleep 3;
> >   TEST $CLI_3 volume start $V0;
> >   TEST $CLI_2 volume stop $V0;
> >   TEST $CLI_2 volume delete $V0;
> > 
> > Do you already have this one on your radar?
> 
> It wasn't, thanks for bringing it on my radar :-). Sent
> http://review.gluster.org/7837 to address this.

Kaushal,
I made this fix based on the assumption that the script seems to be waiting 
for all glusterds to be online. I could not check the logs because glusterds 
spawned by cluster.rc seem to be storing the logs not in the default location. 
Do you think we can make changes to the script so that we can get logs from 
glusterds spawned by cluster.rc as well?

Pranith

> 
> Pranith
> 
> > 
> > + Justin
> > 
> > --
> > Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
> > 
> > twitter.com/realjustinclift
> > 
> > 
> ___
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel


Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch

2014-05-21 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri


- Original Message -
> From: "Justin Clift" 
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" 
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:01:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch
> 
> On 21/05/2014, at 6:17 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Kicked off 21 VM's in Rackspace earlier today, running the regression tests
> > against master branch.
> > 
> > Only 3 VM's failed out of the 21 (86% PASS, 14% FAIL), with all three being
> > for the same test:
> > 
> > Test Summary Report
> > ---
> > ./tests/bugs/bug-948686.t   (Wstat: 0 Tests: 20 Failed:
> > 2)
> >  Failed tests:  13-14
> > Files=230, Tests=4373, 5601 wallclock secs ( 2.09 usr  1.58 sys + 1012.66
> > cusr 688.80 csys = 1705.13 CPU)
> > Result: FAIL
> 
> 
> Interestingly, this one looks like a simple time based thing
> too.  The failed tests are the ones after the sleep:
> 
>   ...
>   #modify volume config to see change in volume-sync
>   TEST $CLI_1 volume set $V0 write-behind off
>   #add some files to the volume to see effect of volume-heal cmd
>   TEST touch $M0/{1..100};
>   TEST $CLI_1 volume stop $V0;
>   TEST $glusterd_3;
>   sleep 3;
>   TEST $CLI_3 volume start $V0;
>   TEST $CLI_2 volume stop $V0;
>   TEST $CLI_2 volume delete $V0;
> 
> Do you already have this one on your radar?

It wasn't, thanks for bringing it on my radar :-). Sent 
http://review.gluster.org/7837 to address this.

Pranith

> 
> + Justin
> 
> --
> Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
> 
> twitter.com/realjustinclift
> 
> 
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel


Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch

2014-05-21 Thread Justin Clift
On 21/05/2014, at 6:17 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Kicked off 21 VM's in Rackspace earlier today, running the regression tests
> against master branch.
> 
> Only 3 VM's failed out of the 21 (86% PASS, 14% FAIL), with all three being
> for the same test:
> 
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> ./tests/bugs/bug-948686.t   (Wstat: 0 Tests: 20 Failed: 2)
>  Failed tests:  13-14
> Files=230, Tests=4373, 5601 wallclock secs ( 2.09 usr  1.58 sys + 1012.66 
> cusr 688.80 csys = 1705.13 CPU)
> Result: FAIL


Interestingly, this one looks like a simple time based thing
too.  The failed tests are the ones after the sleep:

  ...
  #modify volume config to see change in volume-sync
  TEST $CLI_1 volume set $V0 write-behind off
  #add some files to the volume to see effect of volume-heal cmd
  TEST touch $M0/{1..100};
  TEST $CLI_1 volume stop $V0;
  TEST $glusterd_3;
  sleep 3;
  TEST $CLI_3 volume start $V0;
  TEST $CLI_2 volume stop $V0;
  TEST $CLI_2 volume delete $V0;

Do you already have this one on your radar?

+ Justin

--
Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat

twitter.com/realjustinclift

___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel